Sexual Harassment of the DAY

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 526 Responses
  • colin_s4

    bummer

    • ?chukkaphob
    • this dude is an insufferable cunt.bulletfactory
    • that sucks. i know him -___-shellie
    • https://www.thedaily… the woman's story here.shellie
    • not surprised by this..futurefood
    • yeah I'm definitely not surprisedsarahfailin
    • Carrot top?notype
    • what a cock!utopian
    • That story is horrific.cannonball1978
    • I'm so dissappointed I cried a teeny bit. I genuinely like him as a person. Spent time with him. Worked with him. He's helped me and my bf out. What the hell?shellie
    • With the internet and the way fame works these days, you can't outrun your past. The only way to keep your secrets secret is to live on a lower profile.shellie
    • Just read that article. What a c*nt.microkorg
    • from what I've heard, Shellie, is that the allegations are from someone from his past..that's been trying to fuck him over for years...in this instance, I thinkexador1
    • it might be more than possible he's completely innocent... https://pbs.twimg.co…exador1
    • Shellie, if you know him and he helped you, you should reach out to him. At least to ask if its true. Its only currently an accusation and might be false.mugwart
    • I'm going to see how it all shakes out. I haven't spoken to him since before he was in transformers. my bf reached out unrelated months ago. I'm sure he's beingshellie
    • bombarded rn.but if given the chance, i. open you speaking to him for sure. probably when we cross paths ill.shellie
    • *IRLshellie
    • it can b complicated talking to ppl once they teach a certain level of fame. pretty sure I can't reach out about this. but i will see him at some point for sureshellie
    • and i. down to great his side from the source. these situations its hard. I will probably believe him. I also want to believe bc history. It's complicated.shellie
    • *fuck idk how to reprogram my spellcheck its fucking up all my commentsshellie
    • I get this. I'm no way supportive of these crimes. Its just hard to work out, for example my ex wife would get drunk and crazy. In the morning it was always memugwart
    • that did the crimes. As a society she is believed over myself and she uses this against me every fight. Its hell. Not saying these guys are all innocent.mugwart
    • Im definitely not saying some stories arent sus. The true test us how many others come out. Usually these guys leave a trail. They never get caught the 1st X.shellie
  • Gnash8

    • this is great but the problem is that the majority of women didn't feel empowered and needed something like this to feel as strong as she does.shellie
    • she didn't mention this, but perhaps if she had been raped or seriously assulted, she would realize the shut down that occurs which can paralyse someone intoshellie
    • inaction. something i have personally experienced. In my mind i would be a tough bitch. in practice it doesnt aways happen. its uncontrollable.shellie
    • ^ You make an assumption about her to discredit the argument. You're also missing that she's arguing the solution, not the problem.cannonball1978
    • "What women want: fun freedom and an end to feminism"sarahfailin
    • what exactly his her solution? Im not seeing it, but im not wearing my glasses. what i got from her is she wishes women felt empowered without #metooshellie
    • (@sarah, her position is that the current feminist paradigm infantilizes women)Gnash
    • @shellie Its not just #metoo, she has issues with contempo feminism being tone-deaf to class. I suppose if you crack her book you’ll get her take.cannonball1978
    • i have to read her whole book? im talking about what she's saying I this screenshot. if she can't communicate the answer there, her statement is not a solutionshellie
    • her opinion is different than yours shellie. not wrong and certainly not deserving of attack by your admittedly narrow point of viewimbecile
    • When she talks about victim culture, is that what the whole #metoo campaign encourages? It's not an overall solution. Is that what you mean Shellie?Ianbolton
    • Shellie, shes talking about contempofeminism having the wrong one, not her having the right one btw. You can necessarily discuss one and not touch on the other.cannonball1978
    • But imaging it wouldnt take much internet sleuthing to uncover her positive assertionscannonball1978
    • Assertions as solutions, i meancannonball1978
    • cannon said "You're also missing that she's arguing the solution, not the problem." im just asking what the solution is then?shellie
    • Ill try to be more clear: her issue is with the solutions that feminism takes. This blurb doesn’t have a solution. The solution I mean is feminism’s (#metoo etccannonball1978
    • Ill also add that I dont agree with everything she is for BUT I agree that the ideologies of modern feminism is just one path... and a path that seemscannonball1978
    • ... to not welcome skepticism or criticism. Even though people like Ella are on the same page more or less when it comes to societys ills.cannonball1978
    • Even simpler: Feminism: “I have a way to deal with these problems.” Her: “Yes these are problems but thats the wrong solution.”cannonball1978
    • Shellie: “Whats your solution, then, huh?! Huh!?” Her: “Not this stupid stuff, which is prolly making stuff worse.”cannonball1978
    • that doesn't seen contructive at all. it just sounds like bitchy backseat driver with no driving tips or directions.shellie
    • Remove and replace > build on faulty premisecannonball1978
    • I don't see why she calls it a phantom epidemic when in reality you have new stories about this on an almost daily basis.yuekit
    • Which of the allegations is she saying aren't serious? Or she just doesn't like the storyline because it doesn't go with her anti-feminist worldview?yuekit
    • ^ perhaps, reread it.Gnash
    • She tries to inject class into it to somehow invalidate the storyline but...where is she getting this from? I'm pretty sure working class women don't want to beyuekit
    • sexually harassed either.yuekit
    • "Normal, working-class women don't get a look-in. We're the wrong kind of women"yuekit
    • Seems like a strange complaint. Was she expecting the evening news to report on some waitress at a local diner getting her ass grabbed?yuekit
    • She says "we" but she's the editor of a magazine and a published author. Pretty sure she's not working class herself.yuekit
    • I guess we're not reading the same thingGnash
    • I mean it's only four paragraphs. And I even quoted her directly a couple times.yuekit
    • you use some of her words, but not the meaning or intent.Gnash
    • who are you to say she's not working class? Perhaps she worked her way through school. or perhaps she just identifies that way.Gnash
    • She never suggested WC women want to be assaulted.Gnash
    • When she says "phantom epidemic" she's not suggesting sexual assault isn't happening, only that it's not this brand, new trend nobody has noticed until now.Gnash
    • she's suggesting that feminist movement is exclusive of WC women and is "spurred on by...[list]" which is a reasonable statementGnash
    • She seems to be saying there's something frivolous or misguided about people coming forward with sexual assault stories.yuekit
    • It just seems disconnected from the seriousness of many of the actual stories. Of course if they all involved touching someone's knee I could see her point.yuekit
    • ^ this. and honestly safety in numbers is a huge reason ppl are coming forward. i posted a story here in March and it took over a decade for me to say anythingshellie
    • yet still, for now, im protecting his idenity because it. is. hard! i know if i drop his name, his wife abd fam will suffer. if i don't, others may suffer.shellie
    • that's one bc way people are silenced. Also a fear if being blackballed. that is very real. i dont see how ending that sick cycle is a bad idea.shellie
    • "Neither do you need a social media movement to have the guts to stand up to any guy who crosses the line."cannonball1978
    • To my mind, when you take it to social media, you aren't confronting your abuser, You are saying some things and then letting the public confront them.cannonball1978
    • And the fucked up thing is that I can't rationalize like that without someone incapable of critical thought assume I'm "on the wrong team".cannonball1978
    • Set things right, yes. But social media is too distorted and fucked up for any proportional justice or perspective.cannonball1978
    • People are unable to establish or distinguish between what exactly the different levels of inappropriate behavior are. Long hug = rape. Etc.cannonball1978
    • So that spools up hysteria, erodes how we talk and think about things. Victims have their solidarity and pseudo-safety. The trade off is we can't think straightcannonball1978
    • about the actual issues that made them victims to begin with , because the issues themselves are uses for political power.cannonball1978
    • *end rant*cannonball1978
  • utopian11

    When Has Trump Been Accused of Rape or Attempted Rape? Allegations Include a Child, His Wife and a Business Associate

    https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump…

    • "In 1994, Trump took a 13-year-old girl to a party with Jeffrey Epstein, a billionaire who was a notorious registered sex offender....moldero
    • and raped her that night in what was a "savage sexual attack," according to a lawsuit filed in June 2016moldero
    • The account was corroborated by a witness in the suit, who claimed to have watched as the child performed various sexual acts on Trump and Epstein....moldero
    • Anyone that hung about with Epstein is a beast.PhanLo
    • But Hillary's radioactive pizza stained emails.fadein11
    • He's probably the greatest sexual predator. The best. There's been no-one more predatory than him.face_melter
    • lol facefadein11
  • Krassy3

    Seven More Derrick May Accusers Come Forward

    https://ra.co/features/3828

    • "Seven More Derrick" is my new band namesarahfailin
    • I've heard stories for years from friends who have booked him... this has been a long time coming and unfortunately most likely wholly accurate.fadein11
    • Derrick May (try to have sex with you).ideaist
    • The Jimmy Savile of Detroit Techno. (my new band name)mort_
    • "Derrick May (or May Not, But Probably May) Sexually Harass You" is my new band nameKrassy
    • Let's do a festival. Derrick can warm up. Sorry, _may_ warm up.mort_
    • May Accusers Come Forward
      (my New band name)
      utopian
    • He's fucking overrated x1000 anyways. Mediocre at best DJ, and hasn't made any music for 30+ years (probably because he sucks at that too).section_014
    • Jimmy Saville is a bit inaccurate .. they are all over age. dude is a douche for sure, but no one is suggesting a pedoautoflavour
    • Beat me to the 'derrick may...' jokes.StoicLevels
    • If he's charged it would be wise not to set bail, as Derrick May fly.Fax_Benson
    • So apparently all of this happened because the guy who wrote the song "Strings of Life" was based on... who felt Derrick May never credited himyuekit
    • and didn't share royalties... posted the allegations.
      https://www.youtube.…
      yuekit
    • Talk about karma coming back to bite you!yuekit
  • pango7

    • FA/FO award of the day threadKrassy
    • He MAY be able to start in "That (2)'70s Show" once free.ideaist
    • start = star; damn it!ideaist
    • "That (2)'70s Show" = "That (20)'70s Show"ideaist
    • ^we get it lollllfuturefood
    • 2070s lol fuuck imaginefuturefood
    • https://www.youtube.…utopian
    • Thanks for your note-based pity @futurefood.ideaist
    • i guess scientology couldnt get him out of this one.pango
    • He’ll be 70s when he gets outnb
    • Wild shit... the Scientologists are poisoning and/or beating to death dogs of anyone speaking out against them in the pressnb
  • pango11

  • sarahfailin11



  • Ramanisky24

    the fucktard in the middle

  • jagara14

    I firmly agree with this smug bastard

  • _niko2

    so a girl goes into her bosses office, short skirt, high heels, starts chatting and flirting, after a while says it's hot in there and unbuttons her blouse a bit, revealing cleavage and some of her bra, the boss is a little put off but continues the conversation, then she proceeds to cross and uncross her legs 'accidentally" giving him a glimpse of her freshly shaved pussy (she also accidentally forgot to wear panties today) now he's stumbling on his words and clearly thrown off, she then start licking her pen slowly taking it in and out of her mouth in a provocative manner, all the while locking eyes with him.

    The Boss can't control himself at this point and proceeds to have passionate sex with her.

    The next day he's arrested for rape.
    She never verbally consented.
    She was powerless to say NO because of the power dynamics.
    Dressing a certain way isn't an invitation to sex.
    Being in a hot office and loosening clothing isn't an invitation to sex.
    Crossing and uncrossing legs is in an uncomfortable chair isn't an invite.
    neither is personal grooming habits or choice of undergarments.
    and having a nervous habit of sucking on pen's is also not an invite.

    So who's right in this situation?

    • one isn't forced to have sex with all who may show interest. boss should have passed. he should be fired for doing so.Gnash
    • considering this situation would never happen, I'd say she's right to press charges if he raped hermonospaced
    • "and proceeds to have passionate sex with her" There's a lot of missing story here. Cannot answer.SteveJobs
    • he should go self rape himself in the bathroom insteadGuyFawkes
    • was her intention to get him fired? if so morally she is wrong for deception BUT he should not have gone through with thatmugwart
    • He should have fired her for exposing herselfcannonball1978
    • it's rape...

      ... btw... thanks for the boner
      PonyBoy
    • lol boss right :) this isn't so complicated, just be a fucking man and recognize the situation. this way you're just a piece of shit who fucks everything.sted
    • and you deserve to lose.sted
    • Ok, now let’s take the exact first part of the situation but let’s change the ending. The girl doesn’t go to the police but instead writes a blog titled hottest_niko
    • Sex of my life and recounts the encounter with her boss. Anonymously.
      They never have a repeat encounter but she will always cherish this memory.
      _niko
    • Now, given that the situation and the act haven’t changed, only the girl’s perception or reaction to it after the fact, does it change anything?_niko
    • Is it both rape and not rape until the girl decides what it is?_niko
    • And I hope that I’m not coming across like I’m insinuating anything lol, it’s just a thought exercise_niko
    • Sex in the office is always wrong. Fucking your employees is always a bad idea. And inter office relationships are dangerous -- just in case you were confused.shellie
    • That's an easy lawsuit to avoid. Even in this fictional situation where she was egging him on, he should know better. He's her boss. This only happens in porn.shellie
    • Are you really this dumb? This is a man's mythology of what actually happens.monkeyshine
    • Interesting. So if the power dynamics were different, say they were neighbors, then this is ok? Is that what it hinges on?_niko
    • Monkey shine, just a thought exercise, reverse genders if you like. Happens plenty of times the other way around too._niko
    • Or these are both females or both males. Same situation no boss so remove power dynamic. Act happens as before. Scenario 1 rape is claimed, scenario 2 it is not_niko
    • Does one person’s perception of the act change the act itself? Is egging someone on a green light for rape?_niko
    • Scenario 1 boss is morally and legally guilty.
      Scenario 2 the boss is morally but not legally guilty
      _niko
    • With no boss dynamic
      Scenario1 morally and legally guilty?
      Scenario2 morally and legally innocent?
      Only determining factor being how one party acted afterwar
      _niko
    • With the boss dynamic, both are wrong morally and legally per American HR laws. Without the boss dynamic, he should definately get a clear go ahead, becauseshellie
    • Non verbal concent is not sideways consent. It might not be concent at all. And if he's married or she's married, that's adultery, such can make you civillyshellie
    • liable in some states. It's not that hard to cover your ass.shellie
    • Typos. Sorry guys.*Non verbal concent is not always consent *if he's married or she's married, that's adultery, which can make you civilly liable in some statesshellie
    • By changing the "ending" of your story, you are in fact changing the whole story. 1 she consented, 2 she didn't.dyspl
    • You assume her decision afterward change the outcome, whereas the difference was really during the act itself.dyspl
    • You simply outlined pure fiction, where a woman is raped, and still insist on asking who’s “right” here. She was raped.monospaced
  • Gnash6

    Ex-worker is third to sue over gorilla / Woman says she had to show her breasts to Koko

    as well as 'show me your nipples,' Koko signed, 'Let down your hair. Lie down on the floor. Show your breasts again. Close your eyes.'

  • pango2

    • who are these guys?and why was scientology stalking them?capn_ron
    • Creators of SouthPark.dopepope
    • Who are these two no names? Why was a meme created for this? Seems suspicious/cmanipula...reanimate
    • i heard they smoke WEED O.Osarahfailin
    • lol @ no names ... you aren't serious are you?monospaced
    • still, but went to the oscars in drag on acid :)renderedred
    • they have eachotherdrgs
    • https://www.youtube.…drgs
    • No names lol. Only the biggest names in exposing other people's shitteryset
    • In a hilarious way..set
    • were they scientologist at one point? is that why they are being staked?capn_ron
    • Isaac Hayes, who was Chef on SOUTH PARK! was a Scientologist and they did a few episodes absolutely shitting on the whole thing if I recall.face_melter
    • 'C'mon Tom, come out of the closet'.PhanLo
    • They made fun of Scientology in varies episodes.pango
    • no names?
      their show is translated and broadcaster in every single language known to man...
      Miguex
  • mort_8

    • Meme typography is so shit!mort_
    • I agree with the typography, but the Meme message is spot on.utopian
    • Meme typography is meant to be so shit!jagara
    • Memes are shit.CyBrainX
    • Good point jagara. Decent type would actually be a bit weird.mort_
  • _niko5

    • Terminally on reddittank02
    • very fine people on both sidesutopian
    • lol damnYakuZoku
    • Prompt?futurefood
    • It's all alleged but still disgusting and it's.. McMahon. He never has had "above reproach" vibes.garbage
    • Ur?sab
    • Let This Sink In...

      This No Good, Inbred, White Privileged, MAGAtard, Christian, Piece Of Shit is 78 Years Old.
      utopian
    • ^ Second Childhood.garbage
    • "alleged" yikes, just... yikes.imbecile
  • _niko5

    noooooo not this goofy motherfucker

    the accuser was demanding $15 mill for her silence lol

    http://www.mercurynews.com/2017/…

  • utopian13

  • PhanLo-2

    • YEEEEEEE-HAAAAAAW

      *spits
      moldero
    • not Sexual Harassment thopango
    • I'd feel harassed if my cousins were having sex at my grandma's funeral.PhanLo
    • We are being sexually harassed by know this happenedGnash
    • Kinky bastardsi_was
    • #WLMi_was
    • Bury them too!OBBTKN
    • Doris and Deathboy: FOUNDben_
    • Grandmother / sisterChimp
    • Are they the same gender?drgs
    • /\ Gender is a myth.ben_
    • HahaAQUTE
    • Dis or dat.calculator
    • Both ends of the neck spectrumfadein11
    • The look of the guys defiance, he looks angry like he wants to get back to it right away. Arrest was an inconvenience.PhanLo
    • Googles is your friendautoflavour
    • Trump voters.babydick
  • PonyBoy-1

    dude released this on his youtube channel today...

    • I've always been a massive fan of HOC, so this intrigues me. I didn't follow the news story but were the allegations true? I'm unable to follow the subtext..SteveJobs
    • There are witnesses that told the kid to run. So yeah. None of this stuff surprise me anymore. The righteous liberal Hollywood is ripe with pedophiles, rapistsBoz
    • and demented people. God knows I was in that industry for a decade so every time I hear them "fighting" for morals and justice I find it hilarious.Boz
    • and he released this video right after he was criminally indicted. I think he is actually talking to the kid in this video. Sick fuck.Boz
    • and you can bet your ass that half the Hollywood knew he was like this all along. Just nobody really talked.Boz
    • Poor Kevinutopian
    • I don't get you utopian.
      Neil Degrasse goes and touches a woman on a shoulder with some weird pick up lines and you wanna hang the guy but Kevin Spacey is
      Boz
    • rapist fuck who made the 18 year old kid drunk and who knows how many kids he actually did the same thing to and he's poor Kevin. Mind blown.Boz
    • srcsmpango
    • Can't disagree with Boz.Hayoth
    • +1 utopian, hahaNairn
    • weeiiirrrrdshapesalad
    • Boz have you contracted Hayothism? You clearly been hit over the head with a few dumbbells lately. https://i.imgur.com/…utopian
    • https://twitter.com/…Milan
    • i did not read that with sarcasm just saw previous post and reacted my badBoz
    • is this a promo for a cooking show?neverscared
    • he desperately wants a come back.pango
    • He hung about with Jeffrey Epstein, fuck him into space.PhanLo
    • this video is bizarre as hellKrassy
    • not sure its a good moveBennn
    • https://www.youtube.…mugwart
    • @mugwart touché.Krassy
  • NBQ005

    Cristiano Ronaldo said 'I'm usually a gentleman' after 'rape', according to court papers.

    https://edition.cnn.com/2018/09/…

    • https://i.imgur.com/…soundofreason
    • It says he paid the bitch $375,000 in a nondisclosure agreement. It's no longer rape, just prostitution.soundofreason
    • Just like Weinstein getting an actress a role in a movie after fucking them. To paraphrase Rick & Morty: It's prostitution with extra steps.soundofreason
    • If that would have been me I would have signed for half the price somewhere between the jacuzzi and the bedroom.soundofreason
    • Just seeing those 6 figures would have made my sphincter looser than docpoz's mom.soundofreason
    • ^ she was in the jacuzzi as well ;-)mugwart
    • So in your sound and reasonable logic, if a convicted rapist was ordered by the court to pay the victim. The victim is no longer a victim but a prostitute...pango
    • Sanctioned by the justic system...
      -____-
      pango
    • And the rapist is no longer a rapist but a disgruntled sex patron the court thinks who under pay the prostitute...pango
    • -_________-pango
    • Also when you broke into someone's house and took their money then only to pay them back after the police are involved are you still a robber?pango
    • Does it sound reasonable to you? o_O?pango
    • My boy pango! Hear me out:
      The whole idea of an NDA is to avoid a process; therefore, there's no conviction.
      Legally, we don't know if the accused is innocent.
      soundofreason
    • The police are not involved in a NDA, it's a deal between 2 individuals. It's up to the person that receives the money to show how much their silence is worth.soundofreason
    • I am not against somebody receiving monetary retribution if it's accompanied by a legal process where the accused is found guilty.soundofreason
    • So, " if a convicted rapist was ordered by the court to pay the victim. The victim is... a prostitute.". No, that is not what I'm saying. See above.soundofreason
    • "Also when you break into someone's house... are you still a robber?". I am robber as soon as I break into someone's house.soundofreason
    • If I pay the person who I stole from back so I won't be convicted as a robber, it's no longer theft (I'm still a robber). It's borrowing money with extra steps.soundofreason
    • When you rob somebody I hope that it's more than the money they care about, it's also about somebody violating their private space.soundofreason
    • And if they care about their neighbors I would hope they would report it to the police and press charges.soundofreason
    • I hope my logic was sound enough.soundofreason
    • chillmaquito
    • He’s a self obsessed man child who still cries during games, what do you expect?_niko
    • We are chill though. I didn't get any feeling of animosity from pango and there was none from me either. We're just explaining our p.o.v.s.soundofreason
    • haha ...that bustdocpoz
    • fuck...the comments...sad...oey
  • utopian10

    Steve Wynn Resigns As Head Of Wynn Resorts
    Amid Sexual Misconduct Allegations

    https://www.npr.org/sections/the…

    • He looks like a ventriloquist dummy.Frosty_spl
    • It's incredible we've gotten so good at dental preservation but how skin and muscle just don't a fuck about science.noRGB