UFO of the day

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 1,032 Responses
  • Bindegal12

    :)

  • PhanLo3






  • set0

    It's fairly clear that official disclosure is on it's way... within the next few years at a guess. I wonder if the die hard sceptics here are going to openly eat their words?

    What will be even worse for these people is the broadcasting of their lack of ability to research for themselves and apply critical thinking. The kind of person that will only believe something if it's fed to them by the mainstream media.

    Ouchies.

    • +1
      looking forward to the next releases which sound even more interesting.
      fadein11
    • https://i.imgur.com/…uan
    • Presumably your 'die hard sceptics' might then have some tangibly useful evidence worthy of critical analysis?detritus
    • Or do your 'none die hard sceptics' retreat to their apparent default belief of anything coming out of the establishment?detritus
    • Damned if you do, damned if you diddle.detritus
    • Official disclosure of true nature of UFOs, or alien contact, or government experiments? I’m fascinated. How is it fairly clear? Not confrontational here btw.monospaced
    • Aargh, I meant 'apparent DISbelief of anything coming out of the establishment 'detritus
    • Skeptics aren’t pro establishment, theyre anti tin foil hat_niko
    • Skeptics should be pro-truth. It shouldn't matter if it's the establishment or the tinfoil hat brigade.Morning_star
    • ^detritus
    • oh what a surprise, set being arrogant as fuck.inteliboy
    • =]
      The truth will come out eventually
      set
    • ^ if there is truth and if there is disclosure on the way I can only imagine it being polluted.
      Cant fucking wait, for one day I might not be the crazy one ;-)
      mugwart
    • @mug, nothing crazy about knowing the UAP phenomenon is real. It only takes a couple of hours of research to know we are not being told the wholefadein11
    • story (whatever that may be)...fadein11
    • ^ I agree but when/if the story gets to the people it will be distorted I feel. So its not the strange ones like us its the masses that will buy into itmugwart
    • you make it sound like our "normal" reality isn't being distorted alreadyMaaku
    • I defiantly think our "normal" reality is trust me distorted heavily!mugwart
    • So which pill, blue, red or 2cb ?Maaku
    • soon.gifutopian
    • Check out "Unacknowledged" on Netflix if you haven't already.sea_sea
  • Gnash3

    Bummer

    http://www.sgvtribune.com/odditi…

    "One person took a telephoto shot of it. It appeared to be an advertisement balloon for a THC (E-cigarette) that got away.” he said. “I followed it across the foothills from above Sierra Madre towards Monrovia canyon around 11:30 a.m.”

    Several witnesses reported seeing a large, white advertising balloon emblazoned with a corporate logo in the same time and vicinity of the object.

    • hahahahahahahadetritus
    • ^ @set, mostly.detritus
    • lolmonospaced
    • balloons don't stay in the exact same spot for 10 minutesmonospaced
    • :Duan
    • go easy mono, we don't want another episode :)fadein11
    • No reason to laugh at me. You assume I'm somehow invested in it. I simply said it obviously wasn't a balloonset
    • A free floating balloon that is :)set
    • I play believer here and sceptic on the forum I found it on. You assume I'm invested in it.set
    • take it easy, just playin'monospaced
    • the fact that it was a balloon this time isn't a victory, fellow earthlings. keep an open mindGnash
    • It's a victory to those who wish to maintain the belief that they know everything. Isn't that hilariousset
    • You are all focussing on the balloon,and not asking yourselves what's INSIDE the balloon... Aliens, in a UFO. Disguised as a balloon.Muncher
    • Chill out. Just far better vids out therefadein11
    • proof aliens do drugs.uan
    • It's a balloondasohr
    • At least it wasn't cg!!mugwart
  • uan7


  • YakuZoku7

    • omfg is this really the kind of shit people are referencing for believing in alien ufo coverups?monospaced
    • oh mono lolYakuZoku
    • I guess that's a young yesmonospaced
    • oh mono lolYakuZoku
    • He talked to the “highest of the high people”. IM CONVINCEDnb
  • Gardener6

  • detritus4

    • oh dear... lolfadein11
    • I think everyone should a respond to this revelation in the sympathetic and gracious manner that set would.Fax_Benson
    • or just savour the moment :)fadein11
    • haha fax - i was half thinking about not just rehashing and amending text to "I'm not saying it's aliens, but you're an idiot anyway" :)detritus
    • I really do enjoy the fact that I butt hurt people so badly they desperately feel the need to attack me to make themselves feel better. Petty individuals.blessset
    • someone bookmark that for next time, will they?detritus
    • You only confirm your own soreness. It amuses me greatlyset
    • I'm not sure how I could at all be 'butthurt' by what you've written on this page, but interpret a joke at your expense however you so wish, set. kisses.detritus
    • Just, y'know, for the record:
      http://www.qbn.com/r…
      Continuity
    • Look at the filename, continuity ;)detritus
    • Oh. Well played, sir. :DContinuity
    • Because you desperately try to make a joke at my expense and or disagree with everything I say. Every time you possibly canset
    • It simply broadcasts how sore you are

      :)
      set
    • And for that I am eternally proudset
    • c'mon set. People are just taking the opportunity to poke a little fun at the slightly pompous comment you made about balloons. No malice or butthurtedness.Fax_Benson
    • People, fine. I get it. But Detritus shallowly takes every single opportunity he can, and it's rather funny, is all.set
    • Quite, indeed i went for what I perceived as the less-personal attacky option, because shits'n'giggles, yo.detritus
    • You realise there's a whole 12 page thread of taking the piss out of me and I joined it and enjoyed it. I just like to point out how transparent Detritus's..set
    • ... desperate and continuous attempt to try and insult or upset me at every single opportunity he gets. It's funny, and says a lot about him. Bless his cottonsset
    • Well, you're often a bit of a pillock, so you're kind of like a lighthouse of twattery to my ship of infinite virtue and brilliantly witty observation.detritus
    • Yes so I'm sure you tell yourself dailyset
    • hold on, ships avoid lighthouses. that doesn't work.detritus
    • "A MOTH of infinite virtue, stunning hair and gait, brillilantly-witty observation". that's better. Also, I spend all summer chewing set's sweaters, bc butthurtdetritus
    • It's the UK bunch that gets upset at me, funnily. Most others just see it for the light hearted, slightly trolly, fun that it is..set
    • Ships don't necessarily avoid lighthouses all the time, they are also steered by lighthouses. They get their bearings from lighthouses. So you were okay.Muncher
    • lol... no apology needed, det :DPonyBoy
    • I think this is one of my favourite-ever note threads.detritus
    • Good work tintin!set
  • set-2

    • that couldn't possibly be a tiny dust mote, not at all.detritus
    • Yea, but an UNIDENTIFIED FLYING DUST MOTE!dopepope
    • swamp gasutopian
    • interesting footage I suppose. shame all these videos come with the annoying narratives and sub-x-files branding etcFax_Benson
    • I take it you didn't watch the whole video Detritus...set
    • Are they all dust? lolset
    • hehe... fax touched on something that drives me nuts. YT channels w/their stupid DYI branding... kills my desire to give this any credence... but I shall watch!PonyBoy
    • I'm going with dust... even w/the one that angles hard and changes direction... especially that one. Why u-turn like that? Alien forget to close the garage?PonyBoy
    • i want to believested
    • that boomerang towards the end was obviously a pigeon.Gnash
    • Why would you have the camera on at all then? This is stupid.cannonball1978
    • Aye, dust. Particles that small in that sort of ionized environment are going to move, esp. with respect to macro-scale objects.detritus
    • The ISS is travelling through a cloud of particles and generating static build up - it's really not surprising that dust motes exhibit seemingly odd behaviour.detritus
    • Sadly, it's less surprising that people would rather jump at the extraordinary than consider things a little more. Any real aliens around are smirking at us.detritus
    • when I saw the first mote move I actually [mutedly-] joyously exclaimed my surprise, wonder and enjoyment of it. It's beautiful, amazing, awe-inspiring! ...detritus
    • ... it's just not some fucking alien and his moving his glove around isn't evidence of some conspiracy. sorry. i kind of wish it were too, but this here is not.detritus
    • imho, obv. what the fuck do i know?detritus
    • Fuck all apparently. Some might be dust sure... but all? lol to that.set
    • You really don't do yourself any favours 'loling' at stuff as you do, it comes across as hollow condescension and, ultimately, a little bit stupid.detritus
    • Sorry old chap, I just can't help but lol at the assertion that every single one is dust. That's what's ultimately a bit stupid.set
    • Are these dust as well?

      https://www.youtube.…
      set
    • I just think the whole 'it's all dust (swamp gas, ball lightening, whatever) is just as stupid as 'it's all aliens'.set
    • I thought we were discussing < this video? in this video, Yes, it's pretty evident to me that ALL the moving specks there are simply motes of dust.detritus
    • You always maintain the same assertion, set, but here's the thing — so do I. I consider each example on a case by case basis.detritus
    • eg—I've still no good explanation about that Chilean thing, despite reading a few 'FLIR Experts' right off anything other than mundane solutions like planes, &cdetritus
    • 'LOLing' at someone about something that you can't possibly know or confirm yourself in any absolute sense is, intellectually and pragmatically, foolish.detritus
    • and as much as I completely think < these are just dust.. I still couch my absolutism and admit that perhaps I can't know.
      Do you do the same? No. Odd.
      detritus
    • Of course I do. I've always said it's just as bad to outright say aliens 100% don't exist as it is to say they 100% do.set
    • To say it's all dust is far more absolute and pragmatically foolish than me saying I don't know what they are...set
    • ?set
    • Do you really think the one at 8:00 is dust?set
    • I'm really not watching it again—I already gave the cunt two views yesterday— but there were no entities in that video that I didn't think simply dust motes.detritus
    • And it's not foolish to see dust and proclaim it as such — unfortunately here, Occam's razor asks that you rationalise your position, as it is the unlikelier.detritus
    • IT'S JUST FUCKING DUST, WHAT'S WRONG WITH YOU PEOPLE? FUCKING HELL! *breathes* There, better now.detritus
    • Click on 8:00 and tell me that's dust you raging shit

      x
      set
    • k I win then. They're all aliens. Told you.set
    • http://i.imgur.com/P…Gnash
    • I'm sorry, i still see dust. beautiful motes of electrically and — perhaps! — gravitationally looping dust. Not sure if ISS is massy enough to sway specks?detritus
    • @set - I'd love to believe, I really would.
      @detritus - solid line of argument - respect.
      Q: Why would an astronaut conceal alien life? What's the end game?
      BuddhaHat
    • And if he's out there performing an installation or maintenance or something, why would he be focusing on anything other than his work?BuddhaHat
    • Live feed gets cuts, camera moves out of the way, hands in front of camera, etc... NASAutopian
    • I'm with Set on this one. No way is all that dust. I am not saying it is aliens though. But you only have to spend half an hour researching this stuff to knowfadein11
    • NASA has a long history of this kind of thing - particularly stopping live feeds when shit appears they cannot explain. Too many reliable witnesses and mindfadein11
    • blowing cases (mass sightings, airline pilot sightings, military sightings etc.) to say there is not something v.strange going on. Not to mention numerous coverfadein11
    • ups, lifelong death threats, deathbed confessions from people who nothing to gain but ridicule. Yep - it's an interesting subject for sure.fadein11
    • who have*fadein11
    • For sureset
    • Just because you don't understand why NASA would hide alien life, doesn't mean it must not be true. Odd argument, really.
      @Buddha
      set
    • Not that odd @set, it goes back to Occam's razor (courtesy of @detritus), there's no current alternative explanation based on evidence. All that's on camera..BuddhaHat
    • are moving objects; to draw any further conclusions, especially without a keen understanding of the contents space that aren't based on speculation...BuddhaHat
    • could be seen as drawing a fairly long bow, no? OR.... Aliens.BuddhaHat
    • I never said it was aliens, apart from when being sarcastic. I said they're not all dust.set
    • You're assuming based on what... Me suggesting we don't know what some of it is?set
    • Respectfully I'd say those of us without advanced degrees in aerospace engineering or experience in outer space can't intelligently speculate on the objects.BuddhaHat
    • And until such time those objects are definitively identified with evidence, yes, we don't know what a LOT of it is. It's a big place out there.BuddhaHat
    • Addition: unless someone wants to post a pdf of their thesis on the behaviour of objects in space relative to the gravity of a space station, & how this affectsBuddhaHat
    • visual perception on NASA's camera feeds, lenses and signal transmissions. That's what I'm getting at. Without being a cunt, of course.BuddhaHat
    • Right after you post a thesis explaining how relativistic-busting FTL travel could possibly work ;)detritus
    • Human-created dust in low orbit is a knowm problem, as is static build up in low orbit, as is gravity, perhaps making paint flecks and dust motes small moons..detritus
    • CCDs on the ISS are set to pick out hard to discern light, which makes close objects look bright and weird. The footage in <that video isn't IR, it's just lightdetritus
    • but, more bluntly - we see what we want to see, and when it's placed in a OMG UFO context, our interpretation comes prepped.detritus
    • lol detritus, I have written no such thesis sorry old chum, not exactly in my wheelhouse... hence my repeated uncertainty :)BuddhaHat
    • I'm not much of a viewer of these kind of videos, I was really surprised at the conclusions drawn from glove & camera movements on the feed. Seems strange to meBuddhaHat
    • I respect the intelligent input, and agree that some of it can certainly be explained away by dust etc. I'm just saying that to pass it all off...set
    • ... as space dust as if you know it to be true is just as bonkers, or at least almost as bonkers, as saying it's all aliens.set
    • lolmonospaced
    • Mono is part of the small brain crew that can't debate but instead ridicule.... Embarrassingset
    • that is simply not true ... do you like being wrong SO much that you have to make up shit about someone you don't know?monospaced
    • I make one "lol" at your 70-comment discussion with Buddha, and you insult me? Get a grip.monospaced
    • "the small brain crew that can't debate but instead ridicule" set, this is the first thing you do when someone doesn't join you in upvoting your posts.scarabin
    • +1 despite all your unnecessary personal attacksscarabin
    • Again you confuse insulting someone with ridiculing an idea worth discussing...set
    • and again you confuse not discussing with not sharing your viewpoint.scarabin
    • Eh?set
    • if he is in fact attempting to cover it up i'm guessing it may be some secret military thing. dunno why they'd be filming knowing that shit is around thoughscarabin
  • set2

    • always at night time, always shitty footage's...ApeRobot
    • Well lights are more visible in the dark and it's rather far away... most people don't carry hi-tech cameras and tripods.
      Einstein in the room.
      set
    • Easier to spot flickering lights and or movement in the sky at night...and not even the "Innovative iPhone 6 or 7" takes good videos or pics at night.utopian
    • if it's crystal clear footage, they scream 'fake'. if it's hard to see, they scream 'crap'. If it's a little of both, they scream 'fake crap'.dopepope
    • Clearly a dildo dronekona
    • crappy footage makes it easier to spot if ifs vfx or not. how good the camera tracking is and how good the ufo blends in with the real world etcmugwart
    • @ape - try filming anything on your phone or camcorder in the sky (even in daylight) - it won't be good. Post a vid of an airliner - go on. This is good footagefadein11
    • "..carry hi-tech cameras and tripods."
      LOL,...WHAT YEAR IS THIS!!
      ApeRobot
    • I guess you have no concept of filmingset
    • there will never be 'definitive' footage, just as with bigfoot. you need a specimenGnash
    • lol @ dopepope ... if it's crystal clear, they scream 'aliens,' if it's hard to see, they scream 'aliens,' if it's a little of both, they scream 'aliens' ;)monospaced
    • Yep. Both those who scream aliens every time among those who scream not aliens every time are cunts in equal measureset
  • _niko5

    before we see aliens we would see their drones, and before that we would see their version of 1950's sitcoms that they broadcast out to space thousands of years ago.

    I'm hoping that's what the big announcement is, reruns of Leave it to Xztkrlyg

    • Expanding our ideas upon them is stupid. They are nothing alike us, that's the point, that's what "alien" means.grafician
    • We wouldn't necessarily see their sitcoms broadcast from thousands of years ago for many potential reasons, including but not exclusively potential FTL travel.kalkal
    • Say they're 100,000 ly away, that gives them that long between developing radio communication and now for them to advancekalkal
    • Say they survive and flourish for that long, and FTL is possible, it's plenty of time for them to develop that technology. FTL is arguably a requirement forkalkal
    • them to get here if it were to ever happen.

      Twitter hates me.
      kalkal
    • @kalkal our entire galaxy spans 150k light years...grafician
    • So?kalkal
    • I will be very disappointed if the first alien civilisation we make contact with are using radio waves to communicate. Unless some 10G 4 dose vax shit.fadein11
    • They flat out said there is no announcement, but only a report that does not confirm aliens. Basically they promise a lot of nothing I fear.monospaced
    • the idea of that report is they officially acknowledged the issue, anything they can reveal extra is cool too (recovered materials, etc.)grafician
    • does not confirm or keyword 'deny' aliens, fact is no one knows what this shit is.GuyFawkes
    • @mono, don't know about others but I wasn't talking about the report and have never suggested it's aliens.fadein11
    • I wasn’t talking to you so relax.monospaced
    • niko mentioned “ the big announcement”monospaced
    • yeah no worries, thought you were responding to comments, didn't read niko's last sentencefadein11
    • I wasn't even suggesting the report had aliens, just replying to the idea that if it was, that we wouldn't necessarily detect their broadcast before them arrivikalkal
    • ngkalkal
    • if it's not aliens, then it has to be another military secret, or it's ours and the pentagon won't admit itmonospaced
    • or it's just something else benignmonospaced
    • "sir, the results are in and it was a bug on the camera." - "DENY EVERYTHHING"kalkal
  • Danish3

    • needs more Element 115GuyFawkes
    • They're here.dbloc
    • he needs to go on a diet, that fucking ufo can't take off.NBQ00
    • Problem is not the shape, the problem is the speed.grafician
    • Need to get on that gravity train.Wordsworth
    • Needs 91 octanedavey_g
    • these notes LOLsea_sea
  • utopian9

    UFO intelligence report due next month after military sightings, including off Virginia coast

    https://www.wric.com/news/milita…

    • Watch it will be the sequel to alien autopsy, all of this was a clever marketing campaign for alien autopsy 2GuyFawkes
  • GuyFawkes7

    • Don't they have better thermal camera nowadays?ApeRobot
    • The imagery and videos that have been declassified, is of low res quality.utopian
    • a childs skull on his desk wtf?Gardener
  • Ramanisky29

  • yuekit3

    • #truthdbloc
    • Well, if we are alone and this is supposed to be some type of oasis....what a joke.Maaku
    • Joke? It's home to countless varieties of life and the process of evolution spanning billions and billions of years. Oasis is MORE than fitting.monospaced
    • The joke is just the current state of politics to a single species who are a mere blip on the radar in the scheme of things. Totally unrelated :)monospaced
    • yupmoldero
    • The Great Filter is real.garbage
    • Clarke was one of the most brilliant people whoever lived.CyBrainX
    • @Maaku The earth is magnificent. Humanity... not so much.jagara
  • utopian7

    The conversation gets really interesting at 25:30


    • lolmonospaced
    • Always a "lol" from you. Just like our tremendously great president you are a genius and all knowing. Are you two related?utopian
    • ice crystals :)uan
    • it’s funnymonospaced
    • I like the fact he is in line with Greer about they don't pose a threat. And that chilean air force has procedures in place to avoid dangerous human reactions.uan
  • georgesIII1

    Daylight,
    HD quality,
    Nice clear footage,
    Unidentified Flying Object

    the response I'm expecting,

    "OMG, WITH ALL THE SMARTPHONES OUT THERE, HOW COME WE NEVER HAVE ANY CLEAR FOOTAGE, LOL LOLLOL AMYRITE!!"

    • black sausage in the sky,.. sureshot threat.ApeRobot
    • 3/19/15 lol more like 3/13/15utopian
    • Wow, you even have trouble counting to potato.ORAZAL
    • http://en.wikipedia.…
      probably a solar ballon. sorry G.
      uan
    • here a sausage one:
      http://blog.elanco.o…
      uan
    • Paging sureshot...
      Paging sureshot...
      Paging sureshot...
      Paging sureshot...
      utopian
    • I know it's a solar ballon uan, but just to show that even if it was the real thing, they'll still complain, just like the 4k vid I posted sometimes agogeorgesIII
    • Are they sure it wasn't a delicious flying sausage?kona
    • It's the vertical video that I'll complain about.wagshaft
    • From OP:inteliboy
    • "Yeah i found out what it was guys. A primary school about a mile away from me released a solar balloon into the sky. Sorry to burst your bubble guys :)"inteliboy
    • Lol @ "yea I know it's a solar balloon"set
    • why isnt this front pageyurimon
  • fadein114

    For those wondering why the Navy confirmation of the videos being real was a big thing, Dolan summarises it all clearly in this video.

    If anyone has an interest in the subject I highly recommend his books and youtube channel. He always tackles things from an evidence based angle. He's from an academic background and treats this subject as such.

    • Plot twist: they come from inner earth. That's why they are sightings of these crafts coming in and out of water. Makes more sense than visitors from space.Maaku
    • there are*Maaku
    • What? When were they viewed coming out of water?Beeswax
    • @beeswax, it is quite common, and part of these sightings were radar operators tracking them going from 50,000 feet to sea level in under 1 second. And thenfadein11
    • travelling underwater at 400 mph. All tracked on radar.fadein11
    • it's a lot easier to tackle this subject removing the E.T. element Maaku. The phenomenon is real, presuming it is alien visitation is what stops it being takenfadein11
    • seriously.fadein11
    • Look at it from strictly a technology standpoint, what is being witnessed, documented across decades is not within our scientific reach or basic understandingprophetone
    • So what is it, if not something far more advanced from another place or time. It's beyond our scope of understanding, at the highest level.prophetone
    • Is it that inconceivable that another civilization dispatched (drones) to check things out in far off places? Would we not do the same?prophetone
    • We are jussst starting to develop tech decent enough to point out earth-like worlds out of our reach, like in the last 10 yearsprophetone
    • Not a long-shot to believe that another planet is out there maybe e a few hundred years ahead of us and can fire the slingshot a bit furtherprophetone
    • I don’t believe they’re tracking anything that defies our technology. It’s likely just unexplainable glitches. Nothing I’ve seen seems that convincing.monospaced
    • of course mono.utopian
    • @mono - the Navy said exactly the opposite. And all those pilots saw it with their own eyes, not just those cameras. So we have radar tracking, eye witnessfadein11
    • accounts and the camera footage.fadein11
    • @prophetone, yep I agree.fadein11
    • What did the navy say?monospaced
    • Which pilots exactly? Links?monospaced
    • https://www.netflix.…prophetone
    • @mono - the first source that came up amongst many (the original story was NYT, WP and Politico)fadein11
    • https://eu.usatoday.…fadein11
    • I get bored of arguing this stuff esp. as I don't necessarily believe the phenomenon is E.T. related, it's always best to keep an open mind. But after decadesfadein11
    • of secret programs and denials it is hugely refreshing that the US is finally admitting that the phenonmenon is 1. real and 2. they have no idea what it is.fadein11
    • Many other countries have already admitted it but obviously the US is the benchmark as so much of it all is centred around the region.fadein11
    • Blaming it on glitches in radar tech is absurd and surprisingly naive mono. All radar operators are trained to identify glitches in the tech.fadein11
    • I have no answers either though, but if you have any interest in the subject I suggest digging a little deeper. Avoid the little green men and tinfoil hatfadein11
    • nutjobs and focus on the incidents reported by trained observers. I.E. police, military, pilots, govt. All of these witnesses have risked all to speak out withfadein11
    • no personal gain whatsoever.fadein11
    • got I went Deathboy on those notes lolfadein11
    • God*fadein11
    • @fadein correction, some of the US military is finally admitting they have no idea what it is.Maaku
    • true yep, US Navy.fadein11
  • Gnash3

    • https://www.bbc.com/…inteliboy
    • sounds like a meteor when listen to the audio... until he says they "climb away".. scaryinteliboy
    • hmm could be some secret military techdocpoz
    • The Russians are coming!!OBBTKN
    • https://www.theguard…Fax_Benson
    • ...wait wait wait.

      FEMALE PILOT?!
      Nairn
    • The thing about "secret" military tech is that you never see them used it in actual wars. Wasting money on research? I say aliens...Maaku
    • That would kind of be the point, wouldn't it?

      Also, some off the books tech was used in the Bin Laden op a few years back.
      Nairn
    • I can't wait to hear more about this new tech that people have no experience with, but read about on the internet...see_thru
    • You mean the heavily-modified Blackhawk helicopter, or are you snarkily having a go at all input beyond your own immediate senses?Nairn
    • lolsee_thru