UFO of the day

Out of context: Reply #534

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 1,030 Responses
  • fadein114

    For those wondering why the Navy confirmation of the videos being real was a big thing, Dolan summarises it all clearly in this video.

    If anyone has an interest in the subject I highly recommend his books and youtube channel. He always tackles things from an evidence based angle. He's from an academic background and treats this subject as such.

    • Plot twist: they come from inner earth. That's why they are sightings of these crafts coming in and out of water. Makes more sense than visitors from space.Maaku
    • there are*Maaku
    • What? When were they viewed coming out of water?Beeswax
    • @beeswax, it is quite common, and part of these sightings were radar operators tracking them going from 50,000 feet to sea level in under 1 second. And thenfadein11
    • travelling underwater at 400 mph. All tracked on radar.fadein11
    • it's a lot easier to tackle this subject removing the E.T. element Maaku. The phenomenon is real, presuming it is alien visitation is what stops it being takenfadein11
    • seriously.fadein11
    • Look at it from strictly a technology standpoint, what is being witnessed, documented across decades is not within our scientific reach or basic understandingprophetone
    • So what is it, if not something far more advanced from another place or time. It's beyond our scope of understanding, at the highest level.prophetone
    • Is it that inconceivable that another civilization dispatched (drones) to check things out in far off places? Would we not do the same?prophetone
    • We are jussst starting to develop tech decent enough to point out earth-like worlds out of our reach, like in the last 10 yearsprophetone
    • Not a long-shot to believe that another planet is out there maybe e a few hundred years ahead of us and can fire the slingshot a bit furtherprophetone
    • I don’t believe they’re tracking anything that defies our technology. It’s likely just unexplainable glitches. Nothing I’ve seen seems that convincing.monospaced
    • of course mono.utopian
    • @mono - the Navy said exactly the opposite. And all those pilots saw it with their own eyes, not just those cameras. So we have radar tracking, eye witnessfadein11
    • accounts and the camera footage.fadein11
    • @prophetone, yep I agree.fadein11
    • What did the navy say?monospaced
    • Which pilots exactly? Links?monospaced
    • https://www.netflix.…prophetone
    • @mono - the first source that came up amongst many (the original story was NYT, WP and Politico)fadein11
    • https://eu.usatoday.…fadein11
    • I get bored of arguing this stuff esp. as I don't necessarily believe the phenomenon is E.T. related, it's always best to keep an open mind. But after decadesfadein11
    • of secret programs and denials it is hugely refreshing that the US is finally admitting that the phenonmenon is 1. real and 2. they have no idea what it is.fadein11
    • Many other countries have already admitted it but obviously the US is the benchmark as so much of it all is centred around the region.fadein11
    • Blaming it on glitches in radar tech is absurd and surprisingly naive mono. All radar operators are trained to identify glitches in the tech.fadein11
    • I have no answers either though, but if you have any interest in the subject I suggest digging a little deeper. Avoid the little green men and tinfoil hatfadein11
    • nutjobs and focus on the incidents reported by trained observers. I.E. police, military, pilots, govt. All of these witnesses have risked all to speak out withfadein11
    • no personal gain whatsoever.fadein11
    • got I went Deathboy on those notes lolfadein11
    • God*fadein11
    • @fadein correction, some of the US military is finally admitting they have no idea what it is.Maaku
    • true yep, US Navy.fadein11

View thread