Ban the Burqa?

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 143 Responses
  • ********
    0

    " trying to control the way another person presents themselves is moral dubious behaviour and is ultimately non-constructive."

    isn't that what forcing someone to wear a burqa is doing? controlling the way they present themselves?

    this issue is just one giant catch 22

    • Gov legistaltion is not the same as cultural norms that create a predisposition to wear a Burqa.
      ********
    • the women don't want to wear that crap. they only say they do, because if they didn't, they'd pay for it.
      ********
    • and i grew up around muslim women. most of my family is muslim.
      ********
    • But it IS the law in many parts of the world, isn't it?ukit
    • exactly. illegal NOT to wear it. i can't believe you're actually supporting this, lukus.
      ********
    • i know it may seem as though freedoms are being taken away, but really they are GIVING freedom, in the long run.
      ********
    • ..run.
      ********
    • an anology, it's like you're supporting man's "freedom" to cage his dog for life.
      ********
    • just because you're free to do something, doesn't mean it's harmless.
      ********
    • Provide legislature to allow women the opportunity to not wear a Burqa .. don't make it illegal to wear one.
      ********
    • 'banning' this kind of dress is a swing too far in the opposite direction, imo.
      ********
    • that would never work. the woman would take her burqa off and her husband would beat her to death.
      ********
    • You can't say that for sure. On a couple of levels, what you're proposing is similar to the concepts that led to the 'liberation' of Iraq.
      ********
    • .. 'liberation' of Iraq. It's a slippery slope.
      ********
    • We're really talking about stereotypes here - all a government can do is act dispassionately, and impartially. Anything else is wrong, imo.
      ********
    • Anything else is wrong, imo.
      ********
    • yeah, but the french aren't invading a muslim country and trying to 'liberate' them. they're protecting themselves
      ********
    • from the ills of religion
      ********
    • i understand protecting freedoms is important, but not when those freedoms are oppressive.
      ********
    • And as far as the husband beating his wife for taking off her burqa, yes i CAN say this for sure. times a million.
      ********
    • The decision by the French is either political or practical. If it's the former, it's a divisive move and possibly xenophobic imo.
      ********
    • No good will come from it -> it will create more (strongly felt) divides throughout French society.
      ********
    • just as religion has done for hundreds of years. yay for superstition.
      ********
    • I think I know what you mean and I think yr motivation is good .. but people can't be forced to do the wrong or right thing. Choice is key.
      ********
    • Choice is key.
      ********
    • not if it's harmful. i have the Choice to murder someone today. But society has deemed this choice harmful
      ********
    • ..and illegal.
      ********
    • That comparison is completely illogical. No one dies if a woman chooses to wear a Burqa.
      ********
    • You need to accept that some women will freely choose to dress in this way.
      ********
    • The oppression of women is harmful. this is not their choice anyway, they're being forced.
      ********
    • Re: 'forced to do the wrong or right thing', I was referring to imposing a world-view on a person via legislation.
      ********
    • as said, it's a catch 22. islam imposes their views on persons person via legislation. need to leave the office, bye.
      ********
    • You can't assume it's 'not their choice' -> some women (perhaps even the majority) will choose to dress in this way.
      ********
    • Okay, bye -> but Islam is no worse than Christianity imo.
      ********
    • the vast majority do not want to. i come from arabic culture, i know how those men control every move and action of their wives.
      ********
    • wives. and i'm not here to defend christianity. i'm against all forms of archaic practices and ways of thinking.
      ********
    • ok... bye
      ********
  • ********
    0

    Banning Muslim religious dress in particular is singling out particular members of society.

    If the route issue is identification - that issue needs to be addressed. If a law was to be introduced, the law would logically (and fairly) need to provide legislature that addresses that route issue.

  • ukit0

    Religion is an embarrassing relic of the past anyway. All comedians know this


    • comedians are some of the most observant people in the world.
      ********