Politics
Politics
- Started
- Last post
- 33,467 Responses
- BonSeff17
- Gardener14
- kona16
omg.
I don't know how to explain to you that you should care about other people.
Our disagreement is not merely political, but a fundamental divide on what it means to live in a society.
Sincerely,
Fuck off- the kona signals are flaring high today. there should be some cream for that. creating a false narrative that i don't care about other people is sad.omg
- omg, i love you comedic style. so fresh and on point. keep it up man. you are one of the greatest.capn_ron
- He's almost like the new Mitch Hedgeberg, almost.Ramanisky2
- not hedberg, but our generation's joey mccobb.dorf
- more like this > http://www.youtube.c…Ramanisky2
- kona10
So if I'm to understand omg's 'logic' correctly (and I use the term logic loosely)...
If the apartment fire is the fault of the Mayor (who omg will always be quick to point out is a Muslim)
Then the shooting attack must be the fault of Trump? Right?
Well, GOP Rep. Sanford on Va. shooting seems to think so: Trump partially responsible ‘for the demons that have been unleashed’
“The president is at least partially — again, not any way totally, but partially — to blame for demons that have been unleashed,”
“If you let these forces play out, I think we end up at a very, very bad spot,” Sanford said. “What happened yesterday was symptomatic of it.”
Thoughts omg? Willing to apply your logic here?
Nah I'm just kidding omg. I could care less what you think. Go fuck yourself.
- lolRamanisky2
- he is troll bot anyways. he has no feelingstank02
- +1fadein11
- He'll be on the
clock at 4:00 to commentRamanisky2 - Oh, is he still on the clock with his robo profile? :)kona
- Should give him plenty of time to scour the internet for a right-wing canned response he can copy and paste as his own.kona
- < lol. nice.sofakingback
- Only two possible responses, "but Obama" (alternate version "but Clinton") or "fake news."yuekit
- Canned response nuthin'. He'll have a political cartoon.allthethings
- Notice he also referred to the butt-hurt never-Trumpers as demons instead of terrorists.omg
- never-Trumpers? Careful there, wouldn't want to get too hypocritical with the Trumper who shot up a Pizza joint to break up a sex ring in the basementkona
- of a pizza joint that didn't even have a basement. Tell me, was that guy a demon or a terrorist? I'll be looking forward to laughing at your response.kona
- So you think a anyone trying to rescue kids imprisoned for sex is demonic or an act of terrorism.omg
- But shooting up a field of guys playing baseball for their beliefs is somehow more comparable or justified.omg
- Neither is condoned. ps You are laying it on a bit thick with "playing baseball for their beliefs". Lost a bit of your believable dunce cred.garbage
- @omg, there was no sex or demonic act ... that was based on fake newsmonospaced
- well omg, considering the long list of R sex offenders maybe he WAS trying to break up a Repub sex ring...kona
- https://www.democrat…kona
- *drops mickona
- ^ AcesRamanisky2
- If that's the republican list, you know the democratic list is 5 times larger based on prison cell statistics.omg
- Ramanisky215
what a speech
- mg3313
Here's the funny thing about Meryl Streep's speech, even if she was alluding to Trump: It wasn't really a political speech. It was more about common decency, respect for one another, and values we should all strive to in our lives, and that we should expect in others.
The more I keep reading all this stuff, all this vitriol, all this inability of some to see the danger in a person like Trump, I realize we're failing as Americans when people accept the things Streep was speaking about in others, regardless of whether they're in politics or not. These things are like, bare minimum traits we should expect in others.
So, I find it amazing how something so simple gets so politicized, that people draw a line between such basic standards we should hold others to, and ourselves.
It just so happens that she was referring to the person who is going to be president, and the same applies, plus some: the person who holds that position should be held to an even higher standard than we hold ourselves. Every single one of us regardless of political persuasion should demand that of a leader. Their political affiliation is irrelevant.
So here go... four years of arguments and battles over what constitutes decent behavior that has NOTHING to do with politics.
- it was 100% political. if Streep actually cared about bullying disabled people, she would have mentioned those kids who kidnapped and tortured that disabled...omg
- .. Trump supporter.omg
- so omg what you're saying is that you accept this behavior in Trump and don't believe he should be held to the same standards as anyone over the age of 3?monospaced
- Politics aside you can't really argue that mocking a disabled person is an acceptable act by anyone commanding respect.monospaced
- Those gestures were typical of Trump's quirkiness at the time. It just happened that one reporter he was making fun was disabled with similar characteristics.omg
- You can watch him using the same gestures when he talked about Ted Cruz.omg
- https://www.youtube.…omg
- It's okay guise, he acts like an 8 year old bully all the time!inteliboy
- +1fadein11
- Well known fact that Donald suffers from involuntary spaz-hands syndrome. Just terrible luck that he had a particularly bad episode while talking about someoneFax_Benson
- with a disability. Trump's the real victim when you think about it.Fax_Benson
- There you go - being a massive, massive, cunt is 'quirky'.face_melter
- Psychological projection, victim blaming, bullying, obfuscation. omg does it all.monoboy
- Be careful of MSM lies and false flags.omg
- yeah, beware of those, but don't question the bullshit spewing from completely delusional, bible thumping, mouth frothing hate mongrels and liars like Alex Jonemonospaced
- Ramanisky210
Oh man ... lol
- It is like one long, bad skit.utopian
- Ha! To be fair, it appears that he simply didn't hear her say "polls" the first time. They both spoke at once.nb
- Dear God. Delusion 101.
Don't bother me with pesky "facts" as you like to call them.BusterBoy - lol, nice.sofakingback
- says who?Krassy
- aahah goldsted
- He was so ready to fight.monospaced
- wut a dumbassmoldero
- says who?chukkaphob
- I love this ladyhotroddy
- whatthefunk9
- That Aunt Lydia joke on Sarah Fuckabee ... lolRamanisky2
- "Congratulations guys, it's like when a #metoo works out." HAHAHAHAHAnb
- "Trump is the one pussy you're not allowed to grab..."nbq
- “I don’t know what to call Sarah Huckabee Sanders, what’s Uncle Tom for white women who disappoint other white women?” lolwhatthefunk
- Oh the outrage! Suck it up Republitards.BusterBoy
- They panned her but she was "Rosanne style" funny...robotron3k
- Anything that makes Huckabee Sanders and Conway squirm is OK in my books.BusterBoy
- Burn.sofakingback
- why didn't trump attend? weak.inteliboy
- her delivery was shaky at times but overall not bad at all.renderedred
- Trump won’t attend another dinner where anyone can make fun of him to his face, like Obamacare did years ago. Hes still burr hurt about that.monospaced
- Everything Michelle said not only true, but also hilarious, proving this administration of hypocrites also has no sense of humor.monospaced
- nb11
Republicans:
"You must not confirm a Supreme Court Justice during an election year! We refuse to even listen to arguments!"Also Republicans:
"Today we're proud to confirm a Supreme Court Justice, just eight days before an election."EIGHT. DAYS.
Shame on all Republicans. Shame on all the right-wing cowards in the media and at home for not voicing any objection to this epic hypocrisy.
- GOP deserves to lose the presidency, the house and the senate over this. Let's see next Tuesday.nb
- i watched her testimony. all her answers were flawlessGnash
- Absolute power corrupts absolutely.ideaist
- My mum is a practicing catholic even she thinks what Barrett is into is nuts. But her view of American politics/religion is pretty low anyway.PhanLo
- Heyooooo it's not really about Barrett or any particular judge. It's about an entire political party made up of snakes.nb
- And the people who vote for Republicans after this kind of bullshit deserve no respect. Have you no principles at all?!nb
- Like you say nb it's not so much about her bizarre religious beliefs, more about who paid to get her in the position. She voted 75% in favour of corporate...PhanLo
- ...interests in cases in the past, so even they must laugh about her speaking in tongues, but as long as she keeps the lawsuits away, it's all good.PhanLo
- If the dem had the house, they would have done the exact same thing. No question at all.Gnash
- It sucks, but it’s trueGnash
- Oh pls. They would not. This is unconscionable.nb
- The dems did try to do this w/Obama's last year but they didn't control the Senate... what Gnash stated is not only plausible but actually occurred.PonyBoy
- In regards to picking Garland to replace Scolia... Ruth Bader Ginsburg even went so far as to say the following: "“Nothing in the Constitution prevents a...PonyBoy
- ...president from nominating to fill a court seat. That’s their job. There’s nothing in the Constitution that says the president stops being president...PonyBoy
- ...in his last year."
https://www.snopes.c…PonyBoy - PonyBoy you are stretching the truth big timenb
- What the dems did is in NO WAY the same as thisnb
- That happened during Obama's last year of presidency... RBG had his back (of all people).PonyBoy
- And before you compare 9 months to 1 month keep in mind the Presidential campaigns are in full swing w/9 months left. There is no diff between 1 and 9 months.PonyBoy
- I didn't remotely stretch the truth, nb... I understand you're emotional over this and find it outrageous (I agree it's pretty lame)... but facts are facts. :/PonyBoy
- Ya, pony, that’s exactly what I meant. If the dems had the house, 100% they would have pushed through their pick. No questionGnash
- Yes if they had the house they would have pushed their pick. THATS NOT THE ISSUEnb
- The issue is the gop refusing to even hear, 9 months out. Also I’d like to just point out that you said there’s no difference between 1 and 9nb
- I’m not emotional over it. The dems didn’t block a judge under the made up guise of “shouldn’t in an election year”. Election season doesn’t end.nb
- I thought your issue was one of process? The dems ‘process’ would have been identical had they the same opportunity.Gnash
- Zero chance that the dems would not have filled that same seat, the same wayGnash
- Are you saying that if the Dems controlled the Senate that they'd just let hearings occur for Barrett, nb? I'll even spot you 9 months w/that question. :)PonyBoy
- At this point I agree Dems would do the same but this is after the GOP has steadily tossed out all of the standards that existed for confirming justices.yuekit
- For instance there was a very basic expectation that when a vacancy comes up while a president is in office, they get to appoint the replacement.yuekit
- But GOP threw out this rule for Obama. They also blocked all kinds of judicial appointments he tried to do at lower levels and were just assholes generally :)yuekit
- There was also a rule that said if a Supreme Court nominee was too extreme or unacceptable they could be filibustered by the other side. GOP also scrapped thisyuekit
- when they confirmed Neil Gorsuch. So there's been a race to the bottom, none of it illegal but definitely a departure from how things were done before inyuekit
- order to get this right-wing supermajority.yuekit
- The way you guys are framing as if each side is just going to ruthlessly pursue whatever options they have, maybe that's the case now. And maybe when Demsyuekit
- win control of the entire government they will add justices to the SC, which is also totally legal BTW. But this is a new thing, it's not how it was done in theyuekit
- past. There was far more balance and respect for agreed rules and practices back then and it's gone completely off the rails now.yuekit
- yes, as shamefull as it gets...neverscared
- I KNOW they would have filled the seat. That's their job! That's fine! THE PROBLEM is that the Republicans refused to even entertain the notion of a candidate.nb
- A good example of how different things used to be...when George Bush nominated Clarence Thomas for Supreme Court, it was an election year and Dems controlledyuekit
- the Senate. He was a controversial nominee with pretty extreme views. But nonetheless Dems didn't shut it down, they held hearings because they thought they hadyuekit
- an obligation to, and he was confirmed. About 10 Dems even voted for him.yuekit
- tweak the story all you want, but they are both the sameGnash
- I mean they're obviously not if Dems allowed Clarence Thomas, the most conservative justice, to be confirmed.yuekit
- Ya, it’s not like the dems ever borked a potential judge. Oh wait...Gnash
- Are you saying you think that guy should have been appointed to the Supreme Court?yuekit
- He was a terrible choice, helped Nixon cover up Watergate. Democrats opposed him, but so did some Republicans.yuekit
- And after his nomination was withdrawn, Dems voted for Reagan's second choice Anthony Kennedy. So this actually proves the opposite of what you guys wereyuekit
- trying to claim above. In this case they voted based on peoples' qualifications rather than just automatically blocking everything the other party did.yuekit
- Gop voted for dem judges too. They are no differentGnash
- That's what I was trying to explain above, it used to be a much more bipartisan process until the GOP decided to blow things up and start rewriting the rulesyuekit
- during Obama's presidency. This line they are pushing now that this is how it has always worked is not accurate.yuekit
- There was no ‘rewriting’ of any rules. The GOP just did exactly what the Dems would have done. Good try, thoughGnash
- Then why did Dems hold a vote on Kennedy and Thomas when they controlled the Senate?yuekit
- That's two seats on the Supreme Court they could have blocked but didn't. There's no example you can point to of Democrats doing same thing as GOP.yuekit
- No rules were rewritten or broken. Gop voted for dems when they could have blocked too.Gnash
- Because you think the dems dance with the angels doesn’t make it soGnash
- I didn't say Dems are perfect, but this is just the reality of what happened. For the past century...I think it may even go back to Abraham Lincoln...yuekit
- presidents were always given a vote on their nominee by the opposing party, and nearly all of the time the person was approved.yuekit
- Then suddenly under Obama the GOP decided they didn't want to do this anymore. And the reason they gave was that you can't hold the vote too closeyuekit
- to an election, which a rule they pretty much made up out of thin air. Everyone at the time recognized it was unprecedented.yuekit
- Then under Trump of course they approved his nominee literally two weeks before the election. And on top of that they changed the rules so that Supreme Courtyuekit
- appointments required 50 votes rather than 60.yuekit
- Check what party changed the rules about number of votes... Hint, it wasn’t the GOP. In fact, the GOP argued against lowering the required votesGnash
- The dems, in a swirl of hubris, thought they’re win more seats In the future. Oops!Gnash
- So, again, you’re wrong. The Dems are just devious. They just lost the last few rounds of chicken they played with the gop.Gnash
- Keep trying, thoughGnash
- *just as deviousGnash
- Haha no they didn'tyuekit
- https://www.usatoday…yuekit
- Wait aren't you in Canada anyway? Why you care so much about our judicial nomination process? :)yuekit
- Trying to imagine myself sitting through a Canadian judicial hearing or having any kind of opinion about it at all...yuekit
- Don’t think you’d have the attention span, But I’m sure you can imagine something with that big American brain.Gnash
- Um, you read that article? LolGnash
- “ The Democrat-controlled Senate voted 52-48 in favor of the change, which was dubbed the "nuclear option."Gnash
- This is a getting a little silly. I think we can both see that was a different vote than the one I was talking about above.yuekit
- You kept saying there was no rules change, when in reality GOP did change the rules on Supreme Court in 2017.yuekit
- https://www.politico…yuekit
- That's not my main complaint against them BTW, I think what was worse was obstructing everything Obama tried to do in a way that wasn't done to other presidentsyuekit
- whatthefunk11
- or fearGnash
- by definition this is false because Jewish Nazis did exist. The correct term for Germans who joined the Nazi Party would be Volksdeutsche.omg
- I believe Germany was in the shitter after WW1 they we're looking for any strong leader, even Hitler astonished critics at the turnaround at first...robotron3k
- There were Jewish nazis?monospaced
- lolGuyFawkes
- omg is wrong: volksdeutsche is the term for ppl the nazis considered german, but lived in other regions of europe other than naziland.uan
- I wouldn’t be wrong because location is not the issue, since you’re referring to fictitious places called nazi land.omg
- I just didn't want to write germany to differentiate to the modern country called like that.uan
- First, uan's explanation of the definition of Volksdeutsche is 100% correct, and omg is 100% wrong. Volksdeutsch is not about being a NSDAP membership at all.d_gitale
- second, the only 'jewish nazis' in the 3rd Reich would have been Jews who were trying to hide their religious belief in order to save their life you morond_gitale
- get you facts right before commenting, you muppet. Or do you think you can create alternative facts like your leader, you little cuntd_gitale
- Based on omg's posts, its pretty obvious he didn't graduate high school. He's the most uneducated person on this forum. I wouldn't take his comments seriously.sofakingback
- yes ... I normally do not respond to trolls or idiotic comments. I don't know what got me on this one.d_gitale
- Hitler was a Jew. So were many others. They weren't cowering in the corners as you suggest. The Jews occupied Germany for many centuries as their 1%.omg
- You asshole. Hitler was NOT Jewish and the Jews did not “occupy” Germany. You really are one stupid fuck.monospaced
- The definition evolved in time, but through the POV of a Nazi, if you were Volksdeutsch "a German in terms of people or race", you were one of them.omg
- Hitler wasn’t considered “one of them.” You’re trying really hard to be wrong and be an asshole. You’re succeeding.monospaced
- mono, yer an expert on evolution. how does a German Aryan person of blonde hair get jet black hair like Hitler wore on his head?omg
- Sorry, but Hilter's grandfather being Jewish doesn't make me an asshole.omg
- not all nazis had a choice
https://i.redd.it/we…Gnash - It doesn’t make him Jewish either you dumb, racist, confused little alt right shit.monospaced
- What makes him an asshole is that he hated Jews and made it his mission to recruit a nation and embark on mass genocide. You’re also an asshole.monospaced
- lol. so you believe we came from monkeys, but you won't believe Hitler's Jewish grandfather makes him Jewish. Do you know anything about sexual reproduction?omg
- Do you know anything about Judaism? Clearly not, not surprising because you also don’t comprehend evolution. Also, you ARE a great ape species. Asshole.monospaced
- Do you think, even for a second, that believing in evolution is something to be ashamed of? If so, you’re not just an asshole, you’re a dumb fuck too.monospaced
- Lol... wow, are you a creationist or a caveman scientist who thinks that beastiality is how humans evolve?omg
- NEWSFLASH, no matter how much you pound your monkey at home, no human will ever come out of it.omg
- You are on confused, dumb as fuck, bigoted, asshole of a troll aren’t you?monospaced
- haha, that's some funny shit right there.omg
- the only thing funny here is that you are arguing in favor of creationism while exposing your absolute ignorance of evolution, through pure stupiditymonospaced
- BusterBoy10
I don’t know – it’s hard for me to see any U.S. ties to Russia...except for the Flynn thing and the Manafort thing
and the Tillerson thing
and the Sessions thing
and the Kushner thing
and the Carter Page thing
and the Roger Stone thing
and the Felix Sater thing
and the Rosneft thing
and the Gazprom thing
and the Sergey Gorkov banker thing
and the Azerbajain thing
and the “I love Putin” thing
and the Donald Trump, Jr. thing
and the Sergey Kislyak thing
and the Russian Affiliated Interests thing
and the Russian Business Interests thing
and the Emoluments Clause thing
and the hack of the DNC thing
and the Mike Pence “I don’t know anything” thing
and Trump’s public request to Russia to hack Hillary’s email thing
and the Trump house sale for $100 million at the bottom of the housing bust to the Russian fertilizer king thing
and the Russian fertilizer king’s plane showing up in Concord, NC during Trump rally campaign thing
and the Nunes sudden flight to the White House in the night thing
and the Nunes personal investments in the Russian winery thing
and Trump not releasing his tax returns thing
and the GOP platform change to the Ukraine thing
and the Trump reassurance that the Russian connection is all “fake news” thing
and the The White House going into full-on cover-up mode, refusing to turn over the documents related to the hiring and subsequent firing of Flynn thing
And now the trump team KNEW about Flynn's involvement but hired him anyway thing
and The Corey Lewendowski thing
And the Betsy Devos' Brother thing
And the Sebastian Gorka thing
And the pence actually was warned about Flynn before he was hired thing
and the Pence and Manafort connection thing
And the 7 Allies coming forward with audio where trump was picked up in incidental wire tapping thing
and the carter Page defying the Senate's order to hand over his Russian contact list
and the trump wants to VETO Sally Yates' testimony thing
and the trump trying to discredit Yates thingSO yeah there’s probably nothing there!
- Don't normally cut and paste...but thought this was pretty funny.BusterBoy
- lol .. That was beautiful Buster
*wipes tearRamanisky2 - I don't thing that you missed to many Russian/Trump connections here...but Hillary emails!utopian
- Strange not one murder or death. Those seem to only happen when there's a "thing" against Hillary. Not one.... Unbelievable!omg
- omg, you’re looking for death? How about the dramatic increase of dead Iraqi and Syrian civilians under Trump?bulletfactory
- dude. People die everyday! Can't blame that on any one person. The odds that it happens to all the folks who have goods on Hillary and is about to testify....omg
- ... is pretty dang mind blowing! It's not just a "thing", you've got a serial killer on your hands running around doing God knows what.omg
- Who has a huge fuckin' business that employs 2000 people, and their only product is selling speeches. From an impeached president....omg
- ... and a First Lady who no one wants to hear from. But somehow manages to find people who'll pay millions to.omg
- If these $million speeches were so great, why isn't there a DVD compilation of "The Best Speeches from Hillary and Bill Clinton" It's cause its all bullshit.omg
- omgbotrontard2000BusterBoy
- lol omg, did you pre-order the DVD compilation of Trump's Best Speeches? I know you already have the Hitler box set, right next to the Alex Jones tapes.monospaced
- lol. I would pre-order Hillary's missing 33,000 emails on DVD send you the bonus section on high paid speeches since you seemed to have missed that point.omg
- lol monofadein11
- take note: omg's response here, is literary "but emails".inteliboy
- really omg, you have a problem with how Hillary makes money speaking legit, but you want to ignore the paper trail surrounding trump's corrupt businesses?monospaced
- Right mono? omg has gotten pretty low-energy these past few months.garbage
- @omg We're not mad, just disappointed.garbage
- chukkaphob11
- LOLomg
- ^why are you laughing? This is a pretty clear representation of Trumps tax plan you fucking fool.kona
- kona. it's more a representation that your delusional wine glass will magically enlarge itself. "*whispers* you lil bitch."omg
- Thanks for confirming you fail to comprehend this basic infographic, just like you fail to understand the implications of the tax plan.monospaced
- lol at an infographic. The core being reality, you're the farthest from it.omg
- enlighten us and tell us how it works. also, please explain why the "tricke down" policies in Kansas did not result in an economic boom but budget deficits.dorf
- omg, are you really trying to say trickle down economics works? please, cite a source that shows thismonospaced
- because your interpretation that kona is the 1% billionaire that gets the tax break is not only inaccurate, it's full retardmonospaced
- putting money at the bottom never helped create jobs, improve business, economy, or enrich products with innovation. the poor just stayed poor.omg
- Eventually business dies, layoffs and the growing poverty rate would just grow till the entire economy collapses.omg
- not true ... letting people keep their earnings helps boost the economy and overall spending, and helps people save and improve their lives and futuresmonospaced
- seeing your rich boss get richer while your paycheck decreases and your benefits dwindle is what it doesmonospaced
- its sad watching someone try so hard to support and rationalize something that will hurt him so much. omg, you truly are our village idiot.kona
- Master level trollRamanisky2
- mono, you're arguing why we all need a fair tax system where the top and bottom pay their fair equal share.omg
- you're also being just butt hurt jealous in your explanation that someone has more money than you.omg
- If the top of these billion or million dollar companies pays the same equal tax rate as you (ie: 15%), they'll still be paying more taxes than you.omg
- Giving someone food stamps may buy him a bologna sandwich, but it'd be far more better to give him a job instead.omg
- there are some coal jobs are coming back. You should wait for thatzaq
- omg - they are not working for you, they are working for themselves, the fact you don't realise this is both amusing and worrying.fadein11
- regardless its morally unethical to suggest that your money is not your money. that you are obligated to give it to someone else.omg
- to say that any company, product or service does not work for the benefit of its user would mean it would fail and no one would buy it.omg
- lol omg, my tax rate is 40%monospaced
- and if you think regular people only pay 15%, then you truly are one retarded, ignorant asshole, and it explains why you don't understand thismonospaced
- It's a sad, pathetic excuse with "they will pay more taxes", uh, fucking capt obvious. The percentage of their living necessities is the relevant comparison.formed
- and you're a fucking idiot if you think those corporations NEED a tax break. If they're doing so great under trump, then they certainly can pay a fair sharemonospaced
- So maybe that should explain the reason Kansas failed.omg
- Jobs are ONLY made when there is demand. Business owners don't create jobs because they are "nice". No money at middle class = no jobs, everyone loses.formed
- mono, 15% was just an example.omg
- the reason it failed in Kansas is that the rich assholes didn't trickle the wealth down, and that's well documentedmonospaced
- Butr that's logical economics, something the GOP has deliberately discredited to give handouts to the ultra wealthy.formed
- what are you going to be paying after the tax reform?omg
- The fools that regurgitate the nonsense are too dense to realize the charade.formed
- They probably needed a tax break from Obama. What they probably need is a fair tax plan from Trump. Where both you and corporations pay equal percentage in tax.omg
- Where you pay ie: 15% and they also pay 15%. That's fair and equal.omg
- formed. Jobs are not ONLY made when there is a demand. A consumer cannot demand something that he/she doesn't know they need.omg
- if you think it's only about tax rates, then you truly are one ignorant, naive, stupid motherfucking troll ... fuck off alreadymonospaced
- the tax plan is about all the changes that are happening, and all the deductions they're removing that affect non billionairesmonospaced
- most often new ideas are not generated on the idea of being nice, but rather on accomplishing an ideaomg
- @omg, if you think the tax plan trump puts out is more fair, then you really are an idiot, or else just brainwashed to spew the diarrhea you've been drinkingmonospaced
- last I checked many were getting $1100 back in our pockets. equivalent to free service for our iPhones.omg
- correction: $1,182 not $1100omg
- $1000 back in 'your' pockets! Wow, what are you going to do with a whole $36 or so per paycheck? Why, you could almost buy yourself an education omg!kona
- correction: $45 per paycheck! Holy shit you're almost a billionaire!kona
- Yes. You can buy yourself a new laptop to last 4-6 years to give yourself a proper education.omg
- good one omg!
https://imgur.com/ZX…kona
- since197914
lol
- hahahah, so simple but had me laughing.sofakingback
- i too have laughedsince1979
- lmaoCygnusZero4
- love it!formed
- funny because he's a great president.omg
- If you had lived in the 1940's you would have swore Hitler was a good leader. You are that guy.sofakingback
- Salarrue13
- haKrassy
- thiscolin_s
- Bahahaharobotron3k
- LOLmoldero
- reversed.neverscared
- ^ works both ways cause one and the sameKrassy
- allthethings10
- brilliantzaq
- Except for the fact that the white house isn't occupied by Democrats anymore.omg
- omg, you really have tunnel vision right up trumps ass.capn_ron
- HAHAHA
Good one omg .. gooooooood oneRamanisky2 - omg doesn't realize that the racists shifted from D to R starting with Brown v Board of Ed in 1954, Goldwater in 1964 and Nixon's 'Southern Strategy' of '68allthethings
- omg forgets his rootskona
- omg never in his life had so much attention.zaq
- hey omg, ALL LIVING WHITE SUPEEMACISTS AND NEO NAZIS voted for republican for trumpmonospaced
- ^ 100,000% ALLRamanisky2
- You get the point. Omg is in major denial.monospaced
- White House is occupied by conservative assholes. And conservative assholes have always been behind the KkK and racism.monospaced
- "But Hillary's ema... er freedom of speech... er anything to stop me looking like a total prick on a public design forum"fadein11
- Dems denounced this crap decades ago. Republitards embrace it like it was yesterday.BusterBoy
- Decades ago was white pointed caps, today they're wearing masks in all black.omg
- no omg, those are different groups completelymonospaced
- whatthefunk11
- it's like a checklistFax_Benson
- Another tweet that didn't age well.
Trump and his supporters are fucking idiots.kona - well, well, well.....ApeRobot
- You could make a book of theseyuekit
- what kona said ... if, at this point, you still take this man seriously, you've got problemsmonospaced
- lol, I remember this one. these are hilarious.Gnash
- I am sure there will be a book..or books, there seem to be no shortage and we are only months informed
- #MakeSaudiArabiaGrea...utopian
- BusterBoy5
- https://c.sceneclip.…Ramanisky2
- I want to believewhatthefunk
- finally!! there's gotta be something 'bad' if she's tweeting to get the word out.. yes? either way she's about to have her highest rating yet (if this isn't BS)PonyBoy
- "What we've got is from 2005... the President's 1040 form... details to come tonight 9PM ET, MSNBC."Krassy
- she doesn't have a fucking thing!!! are you kidding? give me back my time...pure fucking speculation / conjecture...just question after question after questionPonyBoy
- well she has something :)sted
- got through david k johnston, an American investigative journalist and author, a specialist in economics and tax issues, and winner of the 2001 Pulitzer Prizewhatthefunk
- oh wait... she's about to go through the 2005 return—something that she said is already public? seriously, she better have something other than her stupid Q'sPonyBoy
- she's pretty much a carbon copy of sean hannity... just on the other political spectrum... annoying, full of conjecture and never answers her own fucking Q'sPonyBoy
- 2 pages ahahahsted
- just like when geraldo opened capon's vault
http://www.avclub.co…Gnash - hehe, gnash :)PonyBoy
- :Dsted
- This is just great... Reduce the argument from critics to that of just conspiracy theorists.dorkKn1ght
- So Trump paid $38,000,000 taxes in 2005. #MAGA
https://pbs.twimg.co…omg - he said he pays hundreds of millions each yearmoldero
- lol Maddcow!robotron3k
- Trump paid $38 million in federal income taxes on reported income of $150 million, an effective tax rate of 25 percentmoldero
- So nice of Trump to leak one year of his own Returns.BusterBoy
- Trump would have paid 3.5% tax rate if not for the Alternative Minimum Tax. Because of the AMT he paid ~24% in taxes. Guess what he wants to eliminate???mg33
- ... the AMT. Elimination of it was written into the tax proposal the White House submitted to Congress.mg33
- ^ That's what the 2005 return shows. A little reading between the lines never hurt anyone.mg33
- LuLzDillinger
- only stupid motherfuckers would think a 2005 tax return like this is somehow relevant to his taxes in 2017monospaced
- and I bet there are some stupid motherfucking idiots here who think this somehow vindicates the stupid motherfucking presidentmonospaced
- The average american pays what 39%? I can't find a site that isn't named AOL or fool.com to find legit stats.dorkKn1ght
- Yes, about right. Most people are 33-45%monospaced
- dorfsman12
Jared Kushner and Ivanka Trump Use Private Accounts for Official Business, Their Lawyer Says
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/…
BUT, EMAILS
LOL
- #lockemupnbq
- butter emailscapn_ron
- The hypocrisy will not end, yet the response is....formed
- Snapchat is ok though?PhanLo
- he uses WhatsApp to chat with the Saudi royal asshat who oversaw that reporter getting murdered and chopped into pieces ffsmonospaced
- @mono, imagine the targeted ads he gets now :)fadein11
- whatthefunk16
- maths and reason wont workjaylarson
- 2 be fair confederates fought not for racism but for private property. it just so happened slaves were considered property. so annexation of property made themdeathboy
- fight. would u not be pissed if government seized your property? The problem was the popular cultural idea of property.deathboy
- as far as nazi's its funny they are fundamentally different than confederates. Well socialists to be exact in grinding for equalities that the union probablydeathboy
- would support. being part of the greater good and central system of progress.deathboy
- if you ask me he seems like almost an unemployable hamburger salesmandeathboy
