#BLM

  • Started 5 years ago
  • Last post 3 months ago
  • 605 Responses
  • whatthefunk3

  • Nairn3

    I'm a bit weirded out about Keith Lemon's (whatever his real name is) crying with regret for playing black people, and apparently iPlayer and Netflix removing Little Britain from their services for the same. Frankly, I'm in agreement with the latter, but purely because I always hated Little Britain.

    What I don't get is - what's wrong with a white person playing a black person, especially in comedy? I mean - having a white person what should be a black (or any other ethnicity) role in a film or theatre production or whatever's a bit.. well, daft, but if someone wants to make up a character - why not?

    If they're joking about the person and not the race, as Keith Lemon (whatever) seems to have done - then so what? I was never a great fan, but I don't recall it ever being about racist stereotypes, but his targets' general -ness.

    I've mentioned on here before that - whilst I've not seen the movie it's from (I need to) - one of my favourite memes is the gif of Key & Peele's White Chicks hyper-duck facing. Clearly they're mocking a certain character-type (spoilt valley/daddy's girl), one that is predominantly white - but so what? Fucking cracks me up.

    Honestly, I think it's ultimately more divisive to create these barriers (as I see them). I want to see more non-polarised appreciation of personas from comedians, from all sides, not less of it.

    • This is low on the pile of shit happening right now, I understand, haha.
      Just the reflexive direction things have taken seems.. worrying.
      Nairn
    • When it’s done like Jimmy Fallon did Chris Fock and your lampooning a specific person it might be ok, but it’s when it’s an over the top stereotype_niko
    • erm, keith lemon isn't on little britain is he?hans_glib
    • Of a race like al Holden or when done because you don’t want to use an actual actor from that race like all the yellow face that was done that’s a problem_niko
    • *jolson not Holden_niko
    • Although even Jolson has a complicated legacy, he’s vilified now but at the time he was celebrated in black circles, with him being Jewish and bringing the suff_niko
    • Suffering of the two peoples together and opening the doors for actual black entertainers, many of whom were his close friends._niko
    • No, hans - 'Leigh Francis' had some histrionic breakdown last week and today Little Britain was removed from those services.Nairn
  • Nairn-2

    #whitePeople

    • (leaders of our opposition here in Blighty, for those wot don't know)Nairn
  • grafician2

  • PhanLo0

    King Leopold II of Belgium held the Congo Free State (today the Democratic Republic of the Congo) under personal rule from 1885 to 1908. The colonial nations of Europe allowed his claim to the country by his promise to improve the lives of the native inhabitants. He did not make good on this promise. An estimated 10 million Congolese are believed to have perished during his terroristic rule—a huge decline in the population. Many deaths were carried out in the name of labor laws over natural rubber, a main export. Failing to meet quotas could be punished by mutilation (severed hands were all too common) or even death. Disease and famine claimed the lives of many more, and the birth rate suffered immensely.
    ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
    Leopold was Belgian’s longest serving ruler and as a result, there are still of statuary tributes to him throughout the country. Many have already been defaced.
    -




    • https://www.instagra…PhanLo
    • Columbus did the same thing with the severed handsyuekit
    • That second picture tears me up every fucking time I see it. It's one of the grimmest things I've ever seen - and I've seen a shitload. Thanks, internet.Nairn
    • The Congo was leopold’s own personal estate. Kinda crazy when you think about it. It did not belong to BelgiumGnash
    • insane that a man could wield so much power in a non-government capacity._niko
  • Krassy4
  • nudes4

    don't get played #BLM

  • sarahfailin3

  • SteveJobs0

    I'm going to state what could likely be a very unpopular opinion here, but I think the title of the campaign 'black lives matter' itself is the source of it's own controversy - and needlessly so. It's too succinct for its own good amid a crisis that could use some exhaustive and well-articulated communication.

    If the issues surrounding the title didn't exist, this would be an understandably confusing statement. One might think the intent IS, in fact, to imply one race is more important or deserving than another. If #BLM didn't yet exist and someone came up with 'white lives matter', no matter the context, this would without a doubt require some serious explanation and finessing.

    So what I'm observing is those who don't face the same oppression and lack the context this title serves to remind us of, are left questioning its intent, ultimately causing severe backlash among those who do 'get it', and further clouding a situation that's already not clear enough to those it's so succinctly trying to spread the message to in the first place.

    The ones who respond with 'all lives matter' aren't wrong, but they are missing the point. So the question is, was the point made clearly enough? I'm a big proponent of good communication. It's so very lacking in society at so many levels that I'm rarely surprised how many controversies arise as a result of poor, reckless, or lazy communication. And I have to wonder, is this a prime example of that. Should a campaign slogan need an explanation? Should it not clearly and effectively communicate its message to the audience it's trying to reach? I for one think so.. <emoji shrug for days>

    Aaand in case it needs to be explicitly stated, I can both hold an opinion that questions the execution of a cause and support that cause itself - at the exact same time. :)

    • The key to this is resolution. On the face of it BLM as a movement name doesn't reflect the resolution necessary to understand the issues. At the moment BLM...Morning_star
    • ...as a movement isn't cohesive, maybe it will never be. It could do with a manifesto and some identifiable spokespeople. The link needs to be made between...Morning_star
    • ...BLM as a rallying cry and the complex issues it believes in.Morning_star
    • White privilege much?utopian
    • utopian, state that without the sarcasm? The heckler thing isn't conducive to constructive communication and serves no purpose other than self indulgence.SteveJobs
    • I'm genuinely puzzled that anyone would have a problem with the name. The context is people getting shot, the original post was "Our lives matter. Black livesyuekit
    • matter." In other words, stop shooting us, not we are superior to you. Seems pretty clear to me.yuekit
    • But I guess the inability to understand is representative of the total divide in American society.yuekit
  • Raybandana-3

    Is the goal to stop racism? Or just stop it in America and a couple other countries? You guys been to mainland China or Saudi?

    • India is the biggest racist country it seems.grafician
    • but yes, if it stops in the US, it can follow after that worldwide, as many countries still look up to America as an example of "great" country.grafician
    • You think china will follow and india? HaHAHAHAHHAAHAHAHAHA...Raybandana
    • ACTUALLY, the goal of BLM is to stop the police killing of black men, women and children. And if we can't, to at least hold those cops accountable.
      ********
    • What part of the phrase "black lives matter" is confusing to you? What part of that phrase makes you think of China or Saudi?
      ********
    • Start here, rural america
      https://i.imgur.com/…
      drgs
    • arent their black people in china and saudi? dont they matter?Raybandana
    • I mean can you at least please take two seconds on Wikipedia before you swoop in with your condescending snarky bullshit?
      ********
  • ********
    -4

    Is anyone talking about defunding the CIA or FBI?

    They're racist too?

    • You idiots just don't stop do you
      ********
    • I mean for real people have been advocating for defunding the CIA, FBI and NSA for many many years.
      ********
    • Just don't defund QBNdbloc
    • ^+189grafician
  • ********
    0

    The goal of BLM is that Black Lives Matter and they are disproportionately subjected to police brutality and tougher sentences and there is systemic racism that affects people getting loans, buying homes, getting jobs, etc.

    White people have enjoyed greater economic success as a result of this policing and various policies and slavery.

    The goal is to level the playing field and give black people the same opportunities white people have enjoyed since this country was founded.

    That's why people say "silence = violence" because if black people are not included or organizations are primarily white, people of color's voices are not heard and implicit biases and systemic problems continue, whether people mean for them to or not.

    • Yes.monospaced
    • ugh but that's not true. its a over broad generalization. ie white people have enjoyed greater economic success as a result of policing
      ********
    • only in as much as police helped protect property. police didnt stop black hedgefund mergers or corporate takeovers.
      ********
    • slavery for sure. free labor wasn't free with food and housing. but helped wealth. without a doubt treating black people as property was
      ********
    • wrong. it as those times, not now. if you think china factories that provide room and board to work 60+ a week minimal wages. Willingly. Its not very different
      ********
    • opportunities are all equal. if you deny why? i think jsut looking for "special" opportunities or rights.
      ********
    • people are stupid creatures. even to today its popularly held minimum wage laws are a good thing, although it hurts blacks far more and keeps them out of
      ********
    • labor. It is in my opinion a shit ton of nonsense being peddled by youre masters. Flaming you for their own political aims and gains.
      ********
  • grafician0

  • ********
    -1

    • Gave me chills watching this at the end of John Oliver's last episode.Akagiyama
  • Akagiyama1

    Get rid of the confederate flag.

    NASCAR says "GIT ER DONE!"

    https://apnews.com/9c334b98452b2…

    • why? To get rid of a piece of history now associated with south pride, is like getting rid of gay flags or nor cal stickers
      ********
    • u think because its offensive to you that people flying gay pride flags but religion tells them you shouldnt feel that way are any different than you?
      ********
    • the idiots who chase emotionally chase symbols they have issue than try to ban them from others as an idea of equality infuriate me
      ********
    • pot calling the kettle black. its so selfish with no acknowledgment of it. like a petulant child.
      ********
    • pride is a sin is what the bible says. every other pride accept accepted. as soon as religion doctrine starts to decline it rises again in new forms
      ********
    • Preach!deadsperm
    • thought you be happy this privately owned business is trying to reach a bigger fan base? maybe cuz the racist fan base was stopping them from growth?pango
    • racists are bad for business.pango
  • drgs0
    • I'm sorry but we have to destroy them, aliens were racistyuekit
  • drgs1

    #BLM is a message where the sending side is white, the receiving side is white, the offended side is also white, and the outcome will be more hate for black people

    Discuss

    • got anything to back it up or is that what you feel?pango
    • lol @ pango
      ********
    • Where’d you pull that pearler from? Jesus wept...BusterBoy
    • Vast majority of racists are latent, people who express racism in a non-verbose way, they are watching on the periphery right nowdrgs
    • The bloodiest war in the history of America was the civil war, and we all know what it was aboutdrgs
    • Been reading The Guardian, drgs?Nairn
    • The narrative is becoming white racism is bad, but black racism is good. Although many claim there is no such thing as black racism, doesn't exist.
      ********
    • whats white racism, white racism?pango
  • drgs1

    Gordon Klein, lecturer in accounting, was asked (by his white students) to "give black students special treatment, given the tragedy in Minnesota", ie. to let them pass without taking the exam. He said no --> death threats and a petition to fire him

    https://www.change.org/p/ucla-fi…

    • you such a pathetic loser man.tank02
    • Doesn't it feel good to have someone to hate? Just follow the pointing finger. BLM in a nutshelldrgs
    • it's worth reading the counter petition
      https://www.change.o…
      Bluejam
    • ... just to get BOTH sides of the story although the important missing piece is the initial email asking for 'the special treatment'Bluejam
    • ... without it, it's difficult to judge whether his response correct. Also worth noting that the counter petition has more signaturesBluejam
    • lolpango
    • (((Gordon Klein))) should play his holocaust card.Doris_McSquirter
    • That trumps the BLM card in the hierarchy of oppression surely?Doris_McSquirter
  • Bluejam7

    • @3:45 "That's a lack of growth"Bluejam
    • Cool perspective
      ********
  • pango12

    Village People Kick Out Police Officer

    • lolpango
    • hahahayuekit
    • loluan
    • Lol. PerfectGnash
    • So gay.NBQ00
    • How is the Injun not 'problematic'? Red Lives Matter.Doris_McSquirter
    • ^ @Moderator can we ban this racist for choosing this kind of language?
      ********
    • Easily googled: the guy who played that role for almost the entire history of the band is native. So fuck off Doris, you ignorant fuck.
      ********