Apple
- Started
- Last post
- 3,612 Responses
- youngdesigner-6
This is the most valuable company in the world and all they can do in a year is give you a slightly bigger screen?
Its almost 2020, I expected holograms, I expected hoverboards, I expected...something more than a cell phone made with cheap Chinese parts.
Steve would not be happy.
- The health portion was a big deal in terms of tech, and the AR stuff is chugging along nicely. At some point we have to acknowledge the low hanging fruits havezarkonite
- all been picked and it's going to take more than a year to come up with new tech and implement it.zarkonite
- I don't know, the features were pretty consumer-oriented with the huge health updates and the camera image processing tech was pretty impressive.SteveJobs
- people want new phones from Applemonospaced
- utopian-3
- utopian-6
- which is grater?sarahfailin
- innovative joke right hereinteliboy
- Cheesy jokes.CyBrainX
- utopian-3
- NBQ00-3
- drgs-3
- NBQ00-3
- NBQ00-3
- monospaced-6
Mac mini Pro now. Put all that power in the little box, please. Thank you.
- Didn’t they announce the Mac mini pro? Or was that fake?_niko
- No, the mini is the one from 2020 with the original M1 chip in it. It could easily house the same guts as the MBPs announced yesterday.monospaced
- Not sure why anyone would downvote this. It's quite possibly the ideal machine for most of us who don't need a laptop.monospaced
- No.
Even if the price is good, you still need a fucking display for it so better get iMac or MB Pro duhgrafician - Huh?monospaced
- No. If you have a display already it’s not better. The whole point is that it isn’t connected permanently to a display. That’s a good thing.monospaced
- No, why would you need one when both an iMac and a MBP have better specs and monitors included!grafician
- Weird questions. It would have the same specs as the MBPs, and it's not an all-in-one. This is ideal for many creatives. That was already explained and obvious.monospaced
- Not everyone wants or needs an all-in-one, and there are countless reasons why an all-in-one is not always the best solution.monospaced
- It's why the Mac Pro has never had a built in screen. Surely that makes sense to you. You do run agencies, no?monospaced
- The best reason is that if even a part of your MBP or iMac breaks, you have to replace major parts, or the whole thing, and/or risk losing data.monospaced
- uhm a Mini is just a glorified media box
if you want options get a Mac Pro
also the new versions you can't replace anything lolgrafician - mono you again talk about things you have no clue about just to be in the conversation by all means lolgrafician
- nobody uses a Mini as a creative, in over a decade in the creative business Idk anybody using a mini for work
so you're the weird one with your fetishgrafician - You totally missed the point. I’m talking about a small unit like a mini with all the power of the MacBook pros.monospaced
- I’m talking about it with more knowledge and experience than you. Don’t even imply I don’t know. You’re such a condescending prick.monospaced
- The new MBP silicon is better than the old Pros. So just transfer that to a small desktop. If you can’t figure out how that works then you don’t know shit.monospaced
- It would be the ideal machine for most pro users.monospaced
- You have seriously fucked reading comprehension issue. Here you are rambling about how creatives don’t use minis like a moron off topic.monospaced
- you posted again a rant and didn't actually said anything useful - just stop assuming everybody else is like you
Told you nobody uses a Mini for workgrafician - based on me knowing hundreds if not thousands of creatives - most of them personally! All Mac users, most use MBPs
+ extra display, some use iMacsgrafician - And learn to make an argument based on facts not wishful thinking and imagining thingsgrafician
- I'm NOT suggesting people use a mini for work. I know Minis aren't used by pros. NEVER said they were.monospaced
- I'm suggesting, like they did with the M1, that they put the newest high performance M chips in a similarly sized package like the Mini. It would be awesome.monospaced
- That kind of thing would be well received. It's not a rant. You are the one ranting nonsense about something I never said. Dude, grow up.monospaced
- I never assumed anyone was like me. I'm talking about teh creative teams that upgrade Pro machines and KEEP their displays.monospaced
- Ah okay, but still, I don't see a market for Minis even with latest chips inside
pretty sure the Mini M1 was just an experimentgrafician - Also keep in mind these new chips are laptop chips, for the desktops they will have another version M2 I think they called it with more cores/memory on SoCgrafician
- grafician-5
"New 16-Inch MacBook Pro With M1 Max to Feature High Power Mode for Intensive Workloads"
"The new 16-inch MacBook Pro with the M1 Max Apple Silicon chip will feature a new High Power Mode for intensive, sustained workloads, according to Apple."
- just ordered, M1 Max, 64GB 2TB... far more than i'll need for editing but got 4k from my equipment budget authorised for a new laptop earlier this yearkingsteven
- According to Apple rumors.i_was
- grafician-6
- What are you trying to tell me herecannonball1978
- ah simply exploring how a non-skeumorphic version would look likegrafician
- Still missing obvious interaction on the buttons.i_monk
- grafician-3
$3T
"Apple has reached yet another major milestone. The iPhone maker topped a market value of $3 trillion Monday — the first publicly traded company ever to be worth that much.
Shares of Apple (AAPL) were briefly up about 3% to a new all-time high of $182.88, surpassing the $182.85 per share it needed to be worth $3 trillion. The stock later pulled back from that level.
Apple's market value first crossed the $1 trillion threshold in August 2018 and passed $2 trillion in August 2020."
- NBQ00-4
Too bad the bezels on the screen aren't a bit smaller and a 32'' inch would've been nice too.
Also disappointed no Space Grey version of the MacStudio.
- grafician-4
*Apple Is Working On A Hardware Subscription Service For Iphones
*Apple Hardware Subscriptions Expected By End Of 2022 Or In 2023
- Would subscribe to pro mac equipment. £2 a day to have access to latest top spec equipment.shapesalad
- grafician-7
"Right. A pc with a 3090 will kill this and still be cheaper. Meh
monospaced"
•͡˘㇁•͡˘
Cost of just ONE nVidia 3090 card (if you find it): 2800 - 4500 euros
Cost of high spec 64GB/1TB Mac Studio with M1 Ultra: 3620 euros (3999 usd)
- 1900-ish in the US. You can get a complete computer for less than $3k.formed
- ~£1600 in the UKkingsteven
- can't believe i'm witnessing someone arguing for apple with monospacedkingsteven
- not arguing, just curios how those rategrafician
- and I remember doing this with Mac Pros and Dell workstations for same specs and Dell cost even 20-30% highergrafician
- @kingsteven do you have some links? I see prices £2400 - £4400 on Amazon.co.uk
https://imgur.com/a/…grafician - ^so that's over 5000 euros
Where exactly have you found 3090s for "~£1600 in the UK"grafician - pretty sure both formed and kingsteven you're talking about the 3080 version of nvidia cards, which indeed go for under 2K euros/pounds/dollarsgrafician
- I can pick up a 3090 at the store for $2k anytime. Sorry, troll.monospaced
- you're looking at scalpers on amazon. they're hard to find because of the chip shortages but when stock drops at stores they start around 1.6kkingsteven
- NO, the 3090! It's all over Google Shopping, not hard to find.formed
- Still reasonably hard to find the good brand cheaper models actually in stock in the UK + EU but they drop regularlykingsteven
- Again, have no clue where you guys are looking, but again, all the prices I've posted are real current prices. That card really cost that much if you find it...grafician
- Yep, checked on Google shopping just now, yep same prices, 2500-4000 euros.grafician
- Cheapest I could find was around 2200 euros but it was refurbished.grafician
- @monospaced a PC with the same specs and an nVidia 3090 is at least 3500-4500 euros, so you're either dumb or ignorant, pick yourselfgrafician
- So yes, it COULD be faster depending on the specs, but won't be cheaper not to mention power consumption and noise cuz you don't want a plane on your deskgrafician
- that's not true heremonospaced
- Literally proved you were wrong on the "cheaper" perspective
Specs for specs, PCs are not cheaper!grafician - Even more, for a PC to be on par, would cost 1.5-2x more!
32GB Dell workstations are $4-5K ffsake!grafician - not really, thoughmonospaced