Politics
Politics
- Started
- Last post
- 33,755 Responses
- ********0
- Ramanisky20
Anthony Scaramucci ... enjoy
- That was a waste of time.err
- "My instincts tell me I was wiretapped. I have great instincts. The best instincts. Good genes. Believe me!"********
- what a cocksucker. Such a great way of immediately diminishing and framing every question negatively.kona
- "It's interesting the way you framed that the sky is blue today" literally undermines everything the host says if it's negative towards trump.kona
- instincts. hahahainteliboy
- "it is your show" ....
condescending prickRamanisky2
- BusterBoy4
Trump has excellent instincts...like Obama being born in Kenya. Trump Casinos. Trump University.Trump Airlines. Trump Vodka. Trump Mortgages. Trump.........
- Woman (3rd one now?)kona
- Trump Steakskona
- He's an embarrassment to all real business men.monospaced
- Trump WIneRamanisky2
- He seems to have a strong persuasive skill https://youtu.be/9yC…robotron3k
- Irrelevant.monospaced
- Persuasive skill...so you're proud of the fact that he's a con man? What does that say about his supporters?yuekit
- His supporters are so stupid, they think bad news is good. That it's some kind of popularity contest.monospaced
- GeorgesII-5
- i hate finnish naziskona
- to be fair you really can't have that moustache - if michael jordan can't pull it off no one candigitdaily
- IRNlun6-5
What if Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton Had Swapped Genders?
A restaging of the presidential debates with an actress playing Trump and an actor playing Clinton yielded surprising results.
- monoboy3
To fund border wall, Trump administration weighs cuts to Coast Guard, airport security...
https://www.washingtonpost.com/w…
Given that 40% of undocumented immigrants fly into the US, this makes a lot of sense.
Does somebody have to dress this guy in the morning?
- ********2
During the preparation for Friday’s transfer-of-power, a member of Trump’s transition team floated the idea of including tanks and missile launchers in the inaugural parade, a source involved in inaugural planning told The Huffington Post. “They were legit thinking Red Square/North Korea-style parade,” the source said, referring to massive military parades in Moscow and Pyongyang, typically seen as an aggressive display of muscle-flexing.
- yuekit1
Trump's healthcare replacement seems to be a shittier, more expensive version of Obamacare.
Actually calling it Trump's is generous since it seems he just went along with whatever Paul Ryan and the Republicans came up with, in spite of claiming he had a plan all year.
- Bill is DOA, GOP are a bunch of fucking assholes. they never had an alternative option. despite the last 6yrs of fake repeal attemptsBonSeff
- yuekit1
10 million may lose health insurance coverage under GOP's Obamacare replacement plan, S&P says
http://www.cnbc.com/2017/03/07/1…
Between 6 million and 10 million people would lose health insurance coverage if a Republican proposal to replace the Affordable Care Act becomes law, a new report estimates.
The top end of those losses, or 10 million people, is equal to half of the 20 million or so people who have gained coverage in the past seven years under Obamacare.
- BonSeff6
not a huge fan of this guy but he called it...
- yuekit1
Uh oh...looks like even Britebart is turning on Trump over the health care bill
- You mean the failing Breitbart news?monospaced
- Fake News...Do you really think that Britebart is going to step in Trump's way or hurt him in anyway...unless it is a ruse of some sort.utopian
- Shitebart obviously didn't get the memoyuekit
- I like how they throw a little bit of illegal immigrant fear mongering into the mix for good measure.yuekit
- Breitbart. The Mecca for shitheads.face_melter
- overrated. sad!CygnusZero4
- BusterBoy4
Republicans have had what 6, 7 years to come up with an Obamacare replacement...and they release this hashed pile of horse shit? What a fucken joke they are.
If it wasn't so serious, Obama would be laughing hysterically...but the fact it's probably going to adversely impact so many no doubt mortifies him.
- the hard part was making it look like 'healthcare' without it being that at all.Gnash
- Because Obama cares so deeply about the people, right?********
- Think of his poor feels********
- nice one Set! spot on, buddy. so true. here, have a sticker.scruffics
- Of course Obama cared. He worked hard to create and implement a plan that was working.monospaced
- The claim by Republicans that the ACA was surely going to collapse and ruin lives is not based in reality.monospaced
- Hopefully the plan to increase competition and force big pharma to drop costs works. That is a huge plus for trumps plan. See? I'm not a blanket hater.monospaced
- Keeping the individual mandate is going to upset a lot of people though. That was what the republicans hated so much about the ACA in the first place.monospaced
- Competition doesn't always lead to lower costs, especially with huge companies. Leads to collusion.BusterBoy
- "Hopefully"monospaced
- Spot the blanket hater, haha.********
- ********-5
- youre just mad bc he is a bulldog and taking down your corrupt russian administration!CygnusZero4
- ^ yep. franken would walk circles around any of the idiots that omg reads, this pic just reeks of desperation.BuddhaHat
- I see you guys have no standards except for the support for Franken's double standards.********
- lol, only a home-schooled- by-inbred-crackheads dumb fuck would think this is true, let alone share itmonospaced
- omg, you're really showing your blatant ignorance of reality when you post this nonsensemonospaced
- Just like Trump can't provide evidence of wire-tapping, you'll never be able to provide evidence that Franken opposes school choice.monospaced
- Also, sending children to private school isn't contrary to wanting public schools to be better. It's actually in-line with it.monospaced
- This is just facts as Frankenstein's kids attend Dalton School in New York City where tuition is $44,640 per year.********
- His name isn't Frankenstein, and that fact is irrelevant to his political stand on public education.monospaced
- Frankenstein enjoyed attending a private school, even though you think your kids should be sent to a dumpster.********
- Once again, you're only showing you're idiotic ignorance of a real situation, adding irrelevant facts that reveal how much you do not understand the basics.monospaced
- Franken isn't opposed to choice. He's opposed to private charter schools receiving government funding on top of tuitions, without government oversight!monospaced
- Hypocrite in headline says it all.********
- If you can't grasp that, you're either being dense on purpose, or you're just too stupid to get past your alt-right brainwashing that leads you to misinterpretmonospaced
- Nobody, NOBODY, is against private schools in general. How do you not understand this?monospaced
- “And it’s how you go from a closed system to an open system that encourages innovation,” DeVos said. “People deserve choices and options.”********
- DeVos is saying that charter schools should have government funding and should not adhere to government standards.monospaced
- If people want to send their kids to private charter schools, they should do so without having tuition covered by taxpayer dollars!monospaced
- There's NOTHING hypocritical of sending a child to a private school and paying the full tuition. Once again, you're either a fucking moron, or a mindless troll.monospaced
- IF Franken was advocating that his private school costs should be subsidized by the government, then he'd be a hypocrite. He's not. Fact.monospaced
- That's what DeVos is proposing, which would give taxpayer dollars to religious schools, and what Franken is opposing. How do you not know this?monospaced
- Mono wins here by technical knockout.fadein11
- Franken's kids can go to private school and says your kids cannot have that same privilege, hypocrite.********
- We'll just send your kids to the district they belong in. No choice. No options.********
- Hunger games much?********
- @omg, he didn't say that though, and I don't appreciate you making an argument with a flat out liemonospaced
- but if people want to send their kids to a different school, a private one, they are free to pay for it, and Franken is OBVIOUSLY okay with that, you dumb fuckmonospaced
- Once again, you'll never be able to provide a citation of Franken making that claim, because it doesn't exist except in your pitifully confused alt-right brain.monospaced
- jesus christ, he really isn't picking up on any of these facts at all, mono... you're flogging the proverbial horse talking with bozomg the clownBuddhaHat
- were it not for a mountain of prior evidence, it would be hard to believe he could be this stupid. Kudos to you for trying, tho'.BuddhaHat
- It's quite sad when you think kids shouldn't have a choice in how tax dollars are spent on their education. What benefits are served in preventing opportunity?********
- omg, I DO think kids should have choice! THEY HAVE A CHOICE! If they want to go to a private school, they can pay for it!monospaced
- The only thing that Franken is opposing is that tax dollars don't go toward funding private school educations.monospaced
- The "choice" you're referring to, by the way, is the one where private schools will be funded by government, allowing religious schools to operate as publicmonospaced
- ... without any oversight for standards. How do you not comprehend the very situation you're referring to?monospaced
- DeVos is talking about diverting money to private schools and leaving public schools with even less than before, which is awful. She calls it choice ...monospaced
- ... but what it means is she wants to fund christian schools with tax dollars and deny science in the classroom. That does not benefit anyone except the church.monospaced
- Funding sustainability improves growth and brings in more tax dollars. Regardless of hypocritical religious views, private schools can focus on science too.********
- It is quite sad when you're advocating for a sub-par education at the expense of the already dismal public education system. That's mine and Franken's stance.monospaced
- Look closely. THere's nothing that DeVos has proposed that talks about improving the curriculum, raising standards. She has no experience and it shows.monospaced
- She's been elected by bible-thumping, science-denying, rich white assholes who send their kids to Catholic schools and who want more tax breaks. Wake up!monospaced
- THAT is what is so wrong. THAT is what Franken is so vocal about. THAT is why this is even a meme in the first place. Understand?monospaced
- Perhaps a Muslim school with commercial branding better suits you.********
- A private educational platform gives rise to opportunity to people with ideas in improving education.********
- It also empowers parents to guide their kids in the right direction, allow them to put their money where their mouth is.********
- Parents and businesses can create better environments. Publics schools are not only leeches, but are limited and only teaches folks to stand in line.********
- You must be joking.garbage
- you're such a fucking tool, omg ... THERE ARE muslim schools, and they're private, and that's their fucking RIGHT as Americans.monospaced
- The only assholes who would have a problem with a muslim school existing are the same fucks who want private schools getting government funding.monospaced
- Once again, NOBODY is saying there's a problem with private schools. Just with them receiving funds from taxes and operating without standards!monospaced
- This brings us back to the meme, which shows the power of choice in action. He's PAYING for private school out of his own pocket. Are you that fucking stupid???monospaced
- You're LITERALLY arguing for a system where YOU pay for his kid's private education. How do you not realize that? tax dollars SHOULD improve public system only!monospaced
- You're LITERALLY arguing that the public school system should be gutted in favor of a private system where standards are thrown out the window. How stupid!monospaced
- There's no denying of existence, but your attack and disrespect for private religious school as a problem to deny private schools as a whole.********
- ... will prevent innovation in education. Gutting a system that has proven itself as a leeching failure makes me question what standards you're looking to save.********
- ONCE AGAIN, nobody, NOBODY, is talking about denying private schools existing. They can "innovate" all they want and not act as part of the public system.monospaced
- You're talking about gutting a system and only allowing an unregulated private one to exist, with no standards. Clearly the system failed you miserably.monospaced
- Putting more kids in private schools will benefit all parents to put their hard earned tax dollars towards affording that option is their right.********
- If anyone here disrespected religious schools, it was you when you brought up the muslim school scenario, as if that were any different from catholic.monospaced
- The system you're advocating could result in a city with only private charter schools available, teaching a faith (even muslim) you don't adhere to. That's bad.monospaced
- There are entire counties that are ready to switch to a Creationism curriculum, with government funds, because of this, backed by Trump's entire party. Insane.monospaced
- Franken is saying that if they want to teach that, then keep it private and away from the "public" funding. You would say the same for an all Muslim school.monospaced
- In the DeVos system, a school teaching Islam as curriculum could exist, as a publicly funded (gov.) charter school, legally. What do you think of that, omg?monospaced
- So I'll reiterate ... the private system isn't under attack. It has existed since day one and will exist forever, as a private system, separate from public fundmonospaced
- Tax dollars in education, should go towards improving better education, and welcome freedom of choice.********
- Your notion that it is under attack makes your entire argument, every single one of your comments and accusations, completely baseless. You're flat out wrong.monospaced
- Your standards in public schools who are not able to sustain themselves proves they are public failures.********
- Meanwhile how much of food stamp money go towards funding commercial businesses like sodas. People have rights to choose where they spend their tax money...********
- ... and how exactly does that affect you?********
- You think parents should only be able to spend their educational vouchers on that one available school in their district?********
- lol, you must be one stupid piece of shit if you think the new system will allow a parent to choose which school gets their money ...monospaced
- holy fuck you are so fucking brainwashed, you're making arguments based on such incredibly false, bullshit information, and you're arguing for worse education!monospaced
- Go ahead and name some public services that have been winning profitable success stories. As both PBS and public bathrooms are ironically holes for waste.********
- Got it. So you're not only about gutting schools, but also any public program that doesn't generate profit. You know, you're one despicable piece of shit.monospaced
- Go fuck yourself knowing that you not only lost this argument out of sheer ignorance, naivety and stupidity, but also that you are a pure asshole as well.monospaced
- Troll hard motherfucker, troll hard. Absolutely nothing you can say here will change the fact that I'm right, and you're entire stance is based on fiction.monospaced
- I cannot believe people like you exist.monospaced
- People who seek in better education? Far better than your public sewer you also call a mouth.********
- You're delusional and your attempt at taking some moral high ground regarding my language here is ridiculous considering the damage this is doing.monospaced
- I hope you never procreate, because the idea that the next generation might inherit the stupid that makes up your entire being makes me sick. Fuck yrself to dthmonospaced
- Oh, and for the record, everything you said here only makes my case stronger and makes you look like an asshole. You lost this one and came out wrecked, bitch.monospaced
- allthethings1
https://apnews.com/8f54b14808a24…
AP Top News
China grants preliminary approval to 38 new Trump trademarksThe trademarks cover businesses including branded spas, massage parlors, golf clubs, hotels, insurance, finance and real estate companies, restaurants, bars, and bodyguard and a class of trademarks called "social escort and concierge services" — though it's unclear whether any such businesses will actually materialize in China.
- ********-10
- every time this guy draws Trump he gets skinnier. can't you accept your hero is a 70 year old fatass, omg?BuddhaHat
- The fat, stupid fuck actually looks like this omg, but i'm sure your teeny mind can't even handle a reality check like that
http://i.imgur.com/B…BuddhaHat - love this one - its really subtle - is the vault like a kind of prison? Is Obama supposed to be a crook? Can't be sure - is that what its saying? Who's the guyfadein11
- from Abba on the left? What does he have to do with anything?fadein11
- That's the host of Wheel of Fortune, spinning the wheel.monospaced
- Who's the guy being locked in a bank vault? And why the bars if you have a big door? How did he even get in there? Did they make him crawl in?kona
- No wait. That's a banker locking up a terrorist in his private for-profit prison, located in the vault of his bank. Nailed it!monospaced
- The bars are obvi cemented into the bank vault. Did they put him in there and force him to wait a few weeks while they built the bank vault around him?kona
- perhaps they put in him as a baby and the squeezed in him through the bars then he grew up in the bank/vault/prison... it's really subtle and hard to decipher.fadein11
- we're all clear that that's a somali terrorist caught at the border during the 90-day temporary muslim ban, right?monospaced
- ah I see... get it now. So is this Guantanamo? :)fadein11
- BuddhaHat0
So many winning kaomoji in the CIA documents:
∩( ・ω・)∩ ― happy dog
ᶘ ᵒᴥᵒᶅ ― baby seal
╯‵Д′)╯彡┻━┻ ― angry guy flipping a table
¯\_(⊙︿⊙)_/¯
ó‿ó
Ծ_Ծ
щ（ﾟДﾟщ） < “Dear god why‽ )
٩(●̮̮̃●̃)۶
۞_۟۞
ಠ╭╮ಠ
ಥ_ಥ <So... Beautiful!
ლ(ಠ益ಠლ) y u no guy
∩(︶▽︶)∩
⊙﹏⊙
┌∩┐(◕_◕)┌∩┐
◔ ⌣ ◔
☜(⌒▽⌒)☞
☹_☹
☻_☻
☼.☼
☾˙❀‿❀˙☽
♀ح♀ヾ
♥‿♥
♥╣[-_-]╠♥
♥╭╮♥
♥◡♥
- Ramanisky21
the replies to this tweet ..
- He's getting lit. Shoulda coasted on the low today. What a tool.sofakingback
- too bad twitter roasts are useless against this bossmonospaced
- repeal & replaceRamanisky2
- grab em by the vital parts.fadein11
- What the absolute fuckkona
- ... as long as they are subservient and do not make more money than me.mg33
- "trump honoring women is like michael vick honoring dogs"CygnusZero4
- on the bright side - this tweet came from an iphone, meaning he didn't tweet this, his staff did. He's still the misogynist we all know and love.bulletfactory
- ^ and they threw in 'tremendous' to make it more believableGnash
- How do you see what device it came from?mg33
- Do you all base your 'Trump is a sexist' on the grab them by the pussy comment? Genuinely curious.********
- Because if so, that's retarded, and if not... Enlighten me********
- @set, no, it's based on about his 50 year track record, for better or worsemonospaced
- @mg33 - https://www.dailydot…BuddhaHat
- I also don't believe he's sexist. I think he's just being honest, and I also think a lot of that locker room talk should and could be ignored.monospaced
- also, a variety of twitter apps will tell you, too... http://www.sixtwodig…BuddhaHat
- He's been known to overtly objectify women, not unlike most men. Unfortunately, he didn't curb that language as a grown adult.monospaced
- It's not a mystery this track record of his. Just look it up.monospaced
- There's a huge difference between making a few boyish jokes (in private) or the occasional derogatory remark towards women and...********
- ...genuinely considering them less important or significant as people.********
- I had a friend's girlfriend say to me 'He hates women' which is an utterly ridiculous statement to make********
- @set, maybe not hate, perhaps 'has a very low opinion of...'?BuddhaHat
- http://www.telegraph…BuddhaHat
- his 'greatest (s)hits' go back to the 80s in that article...BuddhaHat
- check out his behaviour towards Selina Scott.Fax_Benson
- boasting about sexual groping - and getting away with it because you're famous - is pretty fucked up, however you look at it.Fax_Benson
- @set — yawn. The facts are there for all to see, over the space of 30 years, trump's attitude towards women.TOMMYxGUNN
- Someone says something about Trump, in comes set to call them ignorant and brainwashed. Set knows best.TOMMYxGUNN
- Seems like you think you do too. Haha.********
- I'm just asking for the fuel that has so many people so sure that he's oh so sexist and anti-woman. I've just seen a few flippant, very typical remarks********
- He's quite clearly a knob head but the shouting of sexism, racism, hatred... The comparison to Hitler etc is ridiculous and unfounded group mentality bullshit********
- As far as I can see.********
- You're welcome to prove me wrong********
- I'm not emotionally attached to an opinion on either side, unlike most people seem to be.********
- Hollywood Access is not reality, unlike Trump's commitment to women's economic empowerment and promotion of women entrepreneurs as key drivers to the economy.********
- Opinion aside, your overall tone is condescending. That's my gripe. Check out the link Buddah posted. Evidence enough?TOMMYxGUNN
- Wow as if media wasn't the main driver of how women are perceived these days. Leave it to BuddahHat to link you towards thinking it was Trump's doing.********
- So saying a derogatory thing to a woman makes you a sexist now? lol to that. He sounds like an idiot sure but nothing in that link is really sexism now, is it..********
- "I moved in on her like bitch" ... while I was married .. to my 3rd wife ... with another child on the way.Ramanisky2
- One of the items is literally "When he told a woman she’d ‘make a great wife". No more detail than that. Hahahaha********
- That is only ever possibly offensive if you're looking at it with super liberal mega feminist shit tainted glasses. Everybody relax.********
- Really set? Define sexism.
https://www.merriam-…TOMMYxGUNN - I guess you're someone who thinks little girls shouldn't be allowed to play with dolls, aren't you?********
- He's an idiot, clearly.... But he hates women? Come on...********
- I agree with set. It's as ridiculous to say Trump hates women as it is to say Hillary is pro-rape. It's not even important.monospaced
- White Georges trolling hard.BonSeff
- These are slightly unimportant side issues granted and let's hope as the leader of the free world he starts to realise the importance he now holds as a rolefadein11
- I didn't say he hates women. But his comments are sexist. That's undeniable.TOMMYxGUNN
- model for millions if not billions of people. The flippant comments need to stop now surely or he will continue to make himself look even more stupid in public.fadein11
- bragging about sexual groping and being able to get away with it because you're famous. He either sexually assaulted somebody, or he's lying becauseFax_Benson
- “I think that putting a wife to work is a very dangerous thing,” said TrumpTOMMYxGUNN
- "when I come home and dinner's not ready, I go through the roof.”TOMMYxGUNN
- he thinks it's cool. Not sure how that's not sexist.Fax_Benson
- But I do have to say Trump does strike me as someone who is likely on the extreme end of the sexist spectrum. But who knows - he may like women even when theyfadein11
- are not pissing all over him ha.fadein11
- Anyone who thinks Trump is a swell guy can fuck right off.
He's a misogynistic pig. Period.kona - I don't think anyone is saying he's a 'swell guy'...********
- people who call him a mega-racist or the new Hitler are idiots. People who point out that he's a sexually aggressive misogynist have it spot-on.Fax_Benson
- Anyone defending and making excuses for his behavior puts them in Trump’s moral boat – a boat rocking wildly side-to-side, taking on water fast.kona
- Because I've been here a while and have seen the rant thread entries, I would gather not a single one of us would ever work for a boss who's characteristics,kona
- morals, or behaviors were similar to Trumps. Maybe some of us would work for a paycheck but we'd fucking hate every second of it.kona
- But, because Trump isn't our boss and none of what he does affects you personally, fuck it right. Forget all the shit he's said and done, hekona
- respects women and minorities. Because when he says "No one respects woman more than I do. Believe me." We have to believe him. Fuck that.kona
- It seems that a lot of you think that if someone doesn't utterly hate Trump in every way, like you, then they must totally love and support him********
- It's weird.********
- agree, but this is the one subject that's beyond doubt.Fax_Benson
- simple minds, i guess. it's either on or off.Gnash
- Or, it could be that he's incredibly polarizing and in the highest position of power in the United States.kona
- Tell me set because I'm rather curious, what metrics do you use when deciding if you like or dislike someone.kona
- My metrics;
honest
reliable
competent
kind and compassionate
capable of taking the blame
able to persevere
modest and humble
pacific and can control angerkona - Totally agree. The world is viewing things more regularly as black and white issues, when they rarely are.TOMMYxGUNN
- But Trump isn't my friend so even though he doesn't pass any of those, maybe lets look to some metrics of a strong president.kona
- honest
focus
respect
clarity
care
integrity
compassion
humility
leadership
supportive
communicativekona - To me, Trump again fails in ever one of those metrics. So tell me, what in him do you see that's good?kona
- But the facts add up with trump and women. Does it make him the new Hitler? No. Does it make him a deeply unpleasant character? Yes.TOMMYxGUNN
- Agree kona but expect some "but Obama" comments coming your way.
It seems an intense dislike for Obama often leads to excuses being made for this utter tool.fadein11 - @set - I get you think the hatred for him has been dripped down from MSM but sometimes things are what they are - a real dipshit has the biggest job on Earth.fadein11
- That's not the Obama point at all. The point is most people love Obama, despite the atrocities that he's committed...********
- Yet utterly despise Trump. I'm sure his time will come, but until then being vaguely sexist and appearing ineloquent...********
- is no comparison to the mass murder and civil unrest that Obama is responsible for. Yet the hatred for Trump is immense********
- is no comparison to the mass murder and civil unrest that Obama is responsible for. Yet the hatred for Trump is immense********
- ... and Obama is virtually paraded through the streets. That's the point. It's scary.********
- And for some bizarre reason Kona seems to think I like Trump, simply because I don't think he's a woman hating, racist nazi.********
- I don't know anyone who loves Obama.fadein11
- @set "vaguely sexist". Come on man. Seriously? What's vague in the comments I highlighted?TOMMYxGUNN
- And "appearing ineloquent". I don't think his eloquence is up for debate is it?TOMMYxGUNN
- He has great respect for women as long as they don't have those 'big phoney tits'.BusterBoy
- give him a few months set, there will plenty of atrocities to speak of ... war is not that far away.Ramanisky2
- I said his time will probably come, I also said he is ineloquent. Do you just glaze over my posts, assume I love Trump and then respond?********
- kona has trouble discerning complexity. you can only use "me like' or 'me hate' statements. anything between those two is assigned according to his biasGnash
- The set argument:
1. Start with something illogical like 'Trump saying grab women by the pussy isn't sexist'. It is.
2. Call the other person a retard forBuddhaHat - thinking that
3. defend Trump in a barely defensible position by downplaying outright sexism as 'boyish jokes'BuddhaHat - 4. is then challenged by someone, and presented with evidence
5. Dilutes the point by saying 'hitler accusations are ridiculous blah blah 'BuddhaHat - 6. Challenges to be disproven, although by most standards he already has been
7. Then says 'I'm not really taking an emotional position on this'(although he is)BuddhaHat - 8. Omg jumps in and says something patently retarded, as is his wont
9. Disputes some of the less severe content in the article without accepting that any ofBuddhaHat - *eye roll
Yeah, that's it.kona - the other content might be true
10. Condescends to everyone and calls people a 'super liberal mega feminist' and then tells them to relaxBuddhaHat - 11. Then downplays the argument in the face of evidence
12. Contradicts his own defense with 'nobody's saying he's a swell guy', even though he has justBuddhaHat - defended Trump's actions
13. Changes the subject to binary 'if you don't love you must hate', ignoring the finer points that have been made about Trump'sBuddhaHat - behaviour towards women
14. Old reliable comes in 'Obama has killed millions' in defence of a clown who's been in office for 6 weeks and hasn't even startedBuddhaHat - 15. Then admits that Trump will likely eventually do the same as Obama, then gross understatements like 'ineloquent' come upBuddhaHat
- That about sums it up, I think.BuddhaHat
- ^ damn dude, lolRamanisky2
- You forgot to drop the mic BuddhaHat.
Well done sir.kona - That's an excellent summary. Right, I'm off to start my campaign to stop little girls playing with dolls.TOMMYxGUNN
- Ugh. He said the pussy thing in private. Someone was outside the door with a mic. Men joke about that stuff sometimes. It means nothing.Get over it, snowflake..********
- I never denied any of the content to be true. None of it is really any more than a bloke being a bloke. As someone else said, the hope is that now he's...********
- ... The president he realises he can't say that shit any more. It's possible he won't, as it's quite obvious he's not the most refined or sharpest tool you have********
- ... but to take flippant remarks, mostly jokes, from the past, and label him misogynistic, sexist, racist, whatever to defend your belief...********
- ... Your hope, even, that he's the worst man in the world, is pretty transparent and rather weak.********
- And how is 'ineloquent' a gross understatement. Do you have a better word? You're just nitpicking petty bullshit now********
- The over the top hatred is getting more pathetic and desperate by the day, and as gnash pointed out you idiotically assume Im pro Trump because I point that out********
- ... but you have lots of bum chums to agree with you so you're so dead set on it all being totally rational and logical. It's pretty funny********
- You're a gaggle of pitch fork weilding goons going after someone for just the most insignificant of offences.********
- Sadly I assume he'll continue the US's narrative of waging war and destabilising countries that don't play ball with agenda 21, but you're focusing on...********
- ... petty, insignificant nonsense.********
- ^ damn dude, lolRamanisky2
- Love you********
- White Georges trolling hard.BonSeff
- "bumchums" - wow, mature retort.
lol @ buddhahat.fadein11 - @set http://33.media.tumb…TOMMYxGUNN
- I'm not going to challenge your wild assumptions on my beliefs because I have better things to do. Another day maybe.TOMMYxGUNN
- Group mentality comfort blanket********
- Fadein you constantly try and call a truce between us but just can't help yourself from butting in against me can you haha. Hard isn't it? I know the feeling********
- Hardly - just thought the bumchum comment was weak for you. Don't direct your frustrations at me... I chose to stay out of this one. Calm the fuck down.fadein11
- truce still in operation (for me at least) but surely I can comment when I don't agree - surely truce does not mean agree with everything yo say? :)fadein11
- As usual I'm perfectly calm.********
- I thought your truce specifically required me to never engage you, haha, but you engage me constantly.********
- Which I don't mind personally, I just see the hypocrisy of it. Anyway... We disagree but I don't have any ill feelings towards you********
- the disengagement truce ended ages ago no? I thought we had got past that and could discuss things now without a terrible argument ensuing. I will not engagefadein11
- you at all if you prefer? I don't have any ill feelings to you also. Just disagree occasionally but mainly with your tone not your points.fadein11
- I'm an arrogant condescending prick, I know. Sorry about that.********
- It comes naturally********
