ban gay marriage
- Started
- Last post
- 155 Responses
- leaves
DOES GAY MARRIAGE THREATEN YOU OR SOMEONE YOU LOVE?
gay people could be coming for you next. will you protect yourself and your family against these evildoers?
fear them. they are terrorists bent on the destruction of our Good-Christian-Morals.or might i suggest:
http://www.kintera.org/site/apps…
- leaves0
god hates.
interesting.
- BXCAR0
Act Up!
- Bio0
wow. sounds like somebody needs a hug.
--------------------------------...
SODOMY IS AN ABOMINABLE SIN, WORTHY OF DEATH.
"If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them." Leviticus 20:13. "Who knowing the judgment of God, that they which commit such things are worthy of death, not only do the same, but have pleasure in them that do them." Romans 1:32.
See also Leviticus 18:22, Genesis 19, Romans 1:18-32, I Corinthians 6:9-11, I Timothy 1:10, and Jude 7.--------------------------------...
(or a good ass reaming.)
- hellraising0
bengay marriage?
- Bio0
god doesn't like prison moveis.
- Casio_Nova0
the butthole is such a sick orifice in the first place, what with all the evil brown goo that comes out of it on a daily basis.
It's gross stuff even if it was a delicious T-Bone steak in the beginning.And we're supposed to sit idly by and accept that men who glorify it as a suitable sexual orifice (considering the lack of a vagina on a man) want to call their legal union MARRIAGE?
Marriage = man + woman and the ability to make baby.
Let them call it a Civil Union, or come up with their own term.
- lowimpakt0
please say your joking.
- leaves0
marriage is about reproduction?
where does that leave straight couples who are unable to reproduce?
- leaves0
Webster's definition of marriage is outdated. meanings change and SHOULD change.
in the end, what right do i (or http://dictionary.com ) have to say that you cant marry the one you love?one's "favorite hole" is no business of mine or yours. and it is certainly not the business of the church OR state.
- Casio_Nova0
The solution then would be for heterosexuals to "marry" then one that they love, and for homosexuals to "civilunion" the one they love.
- lowimpakt0
I think the 'solution' would be for ignorant fucks to get their act together.
- jevad0
fuck off casio
- raytech0
Definetly. They'll make us more fashionbly aware. THE HOORROR; THE HORROR
- leaves0
i'll try to keep this from sounding like an attack Casio for that is not my intent.
why should the two be different?
why should there be different terms for the same idea.
there is already "marriage" and "same-sex marriage". is that not enough?perhaps if we wanted to differentiate between religious marriage vs. non-religious marriage, BUT as long as there is a separation of church and state, the distinction should be a personal choice and marriage itself is not necessarily a religious idea. atheists do it all the same. should they have the right? should we keep the atheists from marrying and reproducing?
all boiled down:
what right would the government have to ban such a union?
- peteski0
GAY MARRIAGE THREATENs or distracts rather, discussion about more impotant issues. A "hot button issue" my ass.
Fuck the media.
- digitalswarm0
Look at this shit:
- jevad0
"what right would the government have to ban such a union?"
None. None at all.
Again, it all boils down to fucking christian religion and it's fundamentalist and conservative lobby.