9/11 Style Attack in LA in May Be Imminent
- Started
- Last post
- 36 Responses
- omahadesigns0
It was a movie.
- benfal990
Trolls are back since a few dayz. wtf
- imagineallthepeople0
.
mg33.i'm sorry if the bump caused you confusion, and i'm also sorry for your time wasted.
that aside, my reasoning for bumping is a bit complicated and i don't care enough to explain.
thank you.
- mg330
Why did you bump this? All this does is waste people's time who see the link to the left and think it's something new.
- 20020
first: build twin towers
- imagineallthepeople0
.
never forget
- sem0
Just want to clear up in my side comment on the subject above I said "I am all for their movement in theory" that I'm not pro their L.A threat, that is very wrong, more their not liking corporate tax avoidance etc.
I plan on going to L.A one day and don't want a repeat of that guy who got stopped because of his comment on Twitter haha.
Thanks :)
- sem0
"Paul Staines, who blogs under the name of Guido Fawkes, said he finds it ironic that anti-capitalist, anti-corporation activists are inadvertently supporting Warner Bros - one of America's 100 biggest companies with profits last year of £1.6bn - by buying the masks." BBC
source: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazi…- who decided on that dumb mask anyway? some assclown no boubtZOOP
- I am all for their movement in theory, just the initial lack of originality in its presentation is a little upsetting. As the article says "its like fighting the bad guys with a lightsabre"sem
- As the article states, its like fighting the bad guys with a lightsabre.sem
- sea_sea0
i was in downtown LA today. for a second i remembered this and felt an urgency to get the hell out of the area. i'm still here, yay.
- dbloc0
it's gone. wtf!?
- freedom0
The Citi bank building is not as iconic as the WTC.
- utopian0
At this point, who has more credibility?
a) The asshats @ Congress
b) The asshats @ Anonymous
c) The asshats @ 9/11 Commission
d) All of the above
- yurimon0
Do these events coincide with presidential rating drops?
I would guess an event in san fran.. like golden gate bridge for the symbolic factor if it was to reach 9.11 similarity...
- ETM0
So Anonymous basically presents the following scenarios:
-Many of them are fear mongers and enjoy lying to get a public response.
-They are full of crap. They are nutters who form opinions with too little fact.Or
- Governments do fear where their movement could go and like to 'leak' false info to discredit them.Or
- They are often right, and the act of putting it in the public domain has actually thwarted some agendas.Seems crazy, but say this was true. Whomever is behind it can't go through with it. Even if they said, Anonymous has it partly right, but it was this group or this country, severe doubt now exists about false flag. Also how do they defend that some random group had more intel than the government?