✎ Responsive QBN
- Started
- Last post
- 260 Responses
- detritus0
The central blue header and shared 'public' icons feel a little lazy.
Also - is this what happens when NTC and QBN get drunk and end up sharing a bed with the zeitgeist?
- oh detritus, detritus, detritus.
It's just a laugh mate. 'Lazy' hahaha. I'm not getting paid.set - you read it as an insult, I meant it as something that coulda done with a little more thought *shrugs*detritus
- jesusfuck, why do you take everything so fucking personally?detritus
- thank you for your kind words, as always.set
- haha, I agree that the icons are not working, but since it's just for fun it's okay to be a little lazymonospaced
- 3am stoned mess around ;-)set
- :Dmonospaced
- oh detritus, detritus, detritus.
- ukit20
So the goal these days is to make everything look like a Windows 8 app?
- Fax_Benson0
The links don't work.
- seriously though, I like it. I'd use it.Fax_Benson
- this doesn't work?
http://gcd.prevue.it…set - Word, just fix the colors.fredddddd
- it was just a facetious joke about the fact that it's a preview pic.Fax_Benson
- :)set
- fredddddd0
FOR A BETTER TOMORROW.
- albums0
No™
- honest0
Newstoday™
- goldieboy0
Yep™
- 23kon0
Keep the layout, but design-wise, i'd like to see it more, well, QBN.
- _me_0
i like it ©®™
- kingsteven0
yup, i'd like to see the (much neglected) public choice on all the pages tho.
✎ = edit
disable images?
- i_monk0
The placement of the QBN logo is just wrong.
- monospaced0
Nice exploration. A little too much color for me, but definitely refreshing.
- formed0
Is there an Edit button??
Overall, it looks pretty good.
- nav seems oddly spaced
- not sure about the font...lower case here, not here...
- ukit20
Design is getting so predictable. Flat design? Check. Bootstrap style icons? Check. The layout isn't really that different from the current site, all he did was change the styling.
- it's just re-skin you muppetset
- What's the point though, just to conform to the latest style?ukit2
- I was stoned.set
- 'The latest style' = lack of unnecessary embellishment.set
- 2013fredddddd
- The latest style exists for a functional reason though. Most people find plain flat sites easier to use.CygnusZero4
- And they conform nicely to various other devices. When you have drop shadows and shit they dont.CygnusZero4
- 'zactlyset
- Minimalism is great (and nothing new). Just needs more personality and uniqueness I think.ukit2
- Disagree. Let the content do the talking.set
- pang0
Current homepage has good amount to see at fist glance; EC x1, x6 features, Public x6, etc.
Meanwhile the new layout has about 2 and 2 half features (maybe x4 at max), 2 and half Public. Less contents means I have to scroll first thing.
Plus it feels like I'm on a MS spin-off/acquired company (that blue tile-looking feeling). But seeing as this is for fun... yeh, good for discussion.- In my opinion the whole idea of getting as much as possible above the non existential fold is not relevant anymoreset
- everyone scrolls. I'll scroll all day if it's content I want to see.set
- you can't get it all on one page on a layout that adapts to all screen sizes,set
- why do you need a layout that adapts to all screen sizes? current one works fine... (devil's advocate)monNom
- animatedgif0
FLAT DESIGN TURQUOISE!
- yurimon0
Does anyone start to find that some new templates have better esthetics then custom web design?
- YES! Screw custom sites.fredddddd
- Templates are designed by someone, right?ukit2
- yeah by designers, template editors should be called "template editors"moldero
- Yes, Im saying from majority of design. Before it used be custom design looked better. at least to me.yurimon
- I know what you mean.
And I don't like it.mikotondria3 - Its because good designers are seeing the potential of having a good design sold to many people over and over again.mantrakid
