Another poor rebrand.
- Started
- Last post
- 52 Responses
- akrokdesign0
yeah, looks like 2011 will be a "gradient year". fu...
- and 2010 was a bad year in branding.akrokdesign
- the new one is nicer though - minus the gradient.CanHasQBN
- agree to disagreeuncannylikeness
- i like the new here.Projectile
- akrokdesign0
the new owners had to step in and turn things around. yeaaaah.
- Hombre_Lobo0
I want to know - why am I not that moron getting paid cash monies to design thoughtless dog shite.
That designer had got it made! It could be me!
- desmo0
Wow. That is horrific!
Thumbs up to in-house design!
- jamble0
I remember when the brand they're replacing was released. Everyone thought it was the worst thing ever.
- ********0
DIxonBaxi will be devistated
- ********0
the authorities have been alerted
- doesnotexist0
everyone's doing the white-space figure now. usa, a&e, now this apparently. there will be more.
old one was better.
- dibec0
terrible. utterly terrible.
- hektor9110
old one better
- FallowDeer0
They even toned down the original dixonbaxi one before replacing it with this, as apparently people didnt know it was channel 5 anymore
- Hombre_Lobo0
While the circle shape is very easy on the eyes, these logo designers need to know that there are other geometric shapes available.
- contia10
Why is the channel 5 site still rocking the "old" logo?
http://www.five.tv/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cha…I call shenanigans!
- contia10
Because it will be replaced February 14, 2011. I am good at research.
- stoplying0
Looks like Mark Weaver had a hand in this.
- imstupeid0
holy shit and that "old" logo was only made in 2008? wat
- ********0
I'm using Impact font.
