Creative Review redesign
- Started
- Last post
- 25 Responses
- clearThoughts0
Yes, but did any of you guys actually looked at a real copy?
The quality of the paper is terrible. Feels like freebie fanzine.I seriously don't think they can sustain it for long. At that price, with that amount of content and with such low quality content.
No offense, but 30% is ads, 60% feels like press releases and the remaining 10% feels a bit like actual editorial content.The website is good though. They should just make it an Annual or bi-annual magazine.
- jimzy0
centered type = bad
coated paper = bad
anthony burrill = good
uncoated paper = good
new format = better, nicer size
- ryngo0
They still haven't got rid of those shitty photographers cards at the back. They're a pet hate.
- PIZZA0
the whole few back pages are a fucking shanty town
- i_monk0
Not a fan. Don't like the new typeface, the size, rules separating columns, etc. Shame.