Creative Review redesign

Out of context: Reply #21

• Started
• Last post
• 25 Responses

• clearThoughts0

  Yes, but did any of you guys actually looked at a real copy?
  The quality of the paper is terrible. Feels like freebie fanzine.

  I seriously don't think they can sustain it for long. At that price, with that amount of content and with such low quality content.
  No offense, but 30% is ads, 60% feels like press releases and the remaining 10% feels a bit like actual editorial content.

  The website is good though. They should just make it an Annual or bi-annual magazine.

  clearThoughts 0Permalink

  UpvoteDownvote

  Flag

  • a bi-annual hardback magazinelukus_W

  Show [[ numHiddenNotes ]] more notesAdd Note

  SaveCancel

View thread