Best small digital camera
- Started
- Last post
- 58 Responses
- ********0
spytech
- acescence0
just realize that you're never going to approach the quality of a DSLR no matter what as it's just an issue of size, there's only room for a postage stamp sized light sensor, about 1/4 the size of an average DSLR sensor. some certainly have superior lenses, but after getting used to a nicer camera it may be frustrating to not be able to capture things like low light and motion
- gentleman0
i heard this was virtually the same innards as the leica but a quater of the price
lies?
- tkmeister0
I bought a leica d-lux 4 for $675 but returned it after a few days. personally, couldn't justify the price for the secondary camera and paying $300 more than a panasonic version. I might just buy a panasonic lx3 or ricoh gx200. The gx200 with a VF is only $450 at adorama. i am just not sure about the noise and 14m pix on gx200.
- benfal990
I know that it's not the gear that make a good photographer but his talent to take good shots and maybe his hability to correct the color in Photoshop.
So I conclude that the Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX3 will be a very good choice for me. This is some of my photos: http://www.flickr.com/photos/bnf…::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::...
- ephix0
the Sigma DP1 is great. has incredible colour and detail. but lacks a lot in speed and low light.
http://flickr.com/photos/ephix/t…
if you go to some of the shots with clouds. you can see the difference it makes.
- robotron3k0
DP1 is awesome, I have one. but ONLY really good in daylight or bright shooting. I find I want to shoot more in night time and low light situations so one day when the DP2 comes out, I'll get that or maybe sell this baby and get me the hot Lumix LX3
- version30
you can buy my 5D, it's light (compared to a heavy bowling ball)
- ylanse0
My vote goes towards the Canon G9.
Fully manual, shoots in RAW, and you can pimp it this:
- Seems cool, underwater especiallywhendog
- reviews are OK but compare to the LX3, the later is way much betterbenfal99
- its pretty muckle in your hand. mate has one and i was checking it out the other week23kon
- wtf does muckle mean?********
- I have been thinking of getting one btw********
- why not G10?********
- lajj0
Haha this on on a rooftop taken from the Van-horne viaduc, right ?
- exactly! :) You know the spot?benfal99
- Exactly! You know the spot? :)benfal99
- I live near thit place,
st-urbain / st-viateur :)lajj - *thislajj
- cOoLbenfal99
- Comment as-tu reconnu l'endroit?? C'est un super zoom de cannes, ca aurait pu etre n'importe où!benfal99
- hehe je me suis tapé une petite session l'automne passé à cet endroitlajj
- http://farm4.static.…lajj
- niiiice. c'est quoi ton flickr? email moi-le: benoitfal@gmail.com si tu veux. je vais te donner le miensbenfal99
- mienbenfal99
- pfff frenchies..gentleman
- :D hehebenfal99
- ok_not_ok0
D-lux 4 is worth every penny.
- davidwrites0
I've got a SD1100 canon elph. Bought it after I broke my SD550. I think they're getting worse, but also cheaper. I'd recommend trying something else. Those Lumix posted on here seem pretty swanky.
- sofakingbanned0
I'm leaning towards the Canon G10.
Since I shot canon already I like how the menus and function are the same.does the new one have all these adapter to?
- if you buy the adapters you have a huge camera - in which case, why not stick to a dslr?********
- if you buy the adapters you have a huge camera - in which case, why not stick to a dslr?
- ESKEMA0
I say go for the LX3. I have the fx35 wich is the low end and it's fuckin great for its price. Only dislike the lack of control on the flash, but that's surely not a problem on the LX3.
- benfal990
LX3 is my final choice.
I will sell my Rebel Xti.
I really think I would be able to do the same job with the LX3 that Iam doing right now with my Rebel. I shoot mostly outside, so I always got a lot of light to take picture and I think Iam good at post-processing in RAW software to adjust the colors and white balance and all.
