Understand photography!!!!
- Started
- Last post
- 27 Responses
- Soud
http://www.boshonto.com/forum/sh…
"Anyone who fails to understand photography, will be one of the illiterates of the future."
Quite funny to topic indeed, I love how he explain it and give a big slam to the artist.
- omgitsacamera0
+∞
- ukit0
What is the purpose of this constant linking to some random BB? Please, explain yourself.
- ukit0
It's fun? Maybe I will try...
- Calero0
plus a million.... love this part...
"Ami_bangalee Wrote:
Now-a-days, there is another group of people who take poor picture and edit it with Photoshop. They enhanced its element by editing. Dude, I am in the field of advertising for a long period of time and use Photoshop far batter then you can imagine. I can make you and your photography an iconic image but I don’t do it. In most of the cases these people break the code of ethics of NPPA and make their poor picture a photograph just to place themselves a well known photographer. I can’t understand why do you need to make your own work a fake one!!!Damn, You are holly batman.
Did you just insult the cool, attractive features of photoshop and the turnout of this photoshop?
But dude whatever you have said is an absolute truth. Congratulations.
I have seen so many "photographers" modifying their photos with photoshop and earning the bestest compliments to themselves. Yes they are acomplished to turn over their photos attractive and elegant. But excuse me, where did the naturality of photos disappear? WHY with a million dollar question mark do any one has to put so much artificial effects to add other features to something. why the photographer cant remain their photo graphy as it as to capture its autencity. Though I am semi- anti-photography depending on the interpretation of it, yet I assume photographers do takes photos to keep one particular moment alive for eternity or to convery some kind of message. I wont go over this, it will lead to another disscussion. But whatever you were willing to express I very much agree with you; and glad that you brought up being a photographer. " I can’t understand why do you need to make your own work a fake one!!! " well said man."
- monNom0
pics or it didn't happen
- Soud0
what do u think?!!!!!!!!!!
- ********0
"I don’t want to make an argument about Canon or Nikon’s Gears of today’s world. They both are good and have some unique features. Though I always use Nikon and I know it very well that Nikon’s technology were 5-6 years behind Canon. Just recently they came up with full frame technology. But please don’t use the technology without knowing it properly."
WHY HE WROTE THIS??????????????SOUND LIKE SHITS
bloody Nikon USER!!!!!!
- 23kon0
"$1 worth Kodak back in 1888"
erm .... wouldnt that have been a lot of money back then?
- 23kon0
what a knob!
photography isnt about the tools you use, it's about the image that you compose or have grabbed at that instant, its how it makes people feel, does it trigger emotions etc.
a photo taken with a 0.5Megapixel cameraphone or a pinhole camera could kick the ass off a £3,000 camera anyday!im not talking image quality - im talking quality photography
- stem0
"If you are one of them, that little tool of yours can certainly make you the popular snapshot taker for friendly get-together or Weeding in your local community but not a photographer"
Weeding? - Now who's illiterate?
- stem0
It's all a question of economics...
- stem0
Not sure when this was written...
This was Kodak btw...Consumer Imaging segment sales totaled $1.397 billion, down 7%. Adjusted for portfolio changes and currency impact, sales were down 5%. Earnings from operations for the segment were $61 million, compared with $184 million a year ago. While sales of most major product categories were down, worldwide sales increased for one-time-use cameras, APS film, reloadable cameras and Picture Maker kiosks and related media.
Health Imaging sales were $561 million, up 5%. Adjusted for currency, sales were up 9%. Earnings from operations for the segment were $108 million, down 8% from $118 million in last year's quarter. Sales of Dry View media and computed radiography products were up substantially in the quarter.
Kodak Professional sales were $367 million, a decline of 11%. Adjusting for unfavorable exchange, sales were down 8%. Earnings from operations for the segment were $49 million, compared with $68 million a year ago. The business continued to experience lower sales to Kodak Polychrome Graphics.
Other Imaging segment sales were $650 million, up 1%. Adjusted for currency and portfolio changes, sales were up 4% from a year ago. Earnings from operations for the segment were $44 million, compared with $86 million a year ago. The segment saw higher sales of motion picture products and services, as well as sharply higher sales in commercial and government services. Digital camera sales recovered late in the quarter as the company regained market share for the quarter.
- Consumer - $1.397 billion
Professional - $367 millionstem
- Consumer - $1.397 billion
- ********0
didn't i tell ya!!!! Nikon user always gigs about their gear
- doesnotexist0
who the hell cares
- ********0
ya right :D
- Soud0
I feel really sorry to hear that, I like the article and those reply, so I shared with you people. Elezabet I can not able to understand why you are so annoying about Nikon Cameras, I like the color of Nikon photos.
- Soud0
:o
- Sandder0
I bet similar articles were written when the kodak consumer camera as put out. Or when photography as introduced. Or when painters started painting abstract paintings. Or when computer programs like quark express were introduced. Also the introduction of television was the death of imagination. Oh, and the introduction of cassette tapes was the death of music...
- hallelujah0
I can't even understand what he's saying