Intelligent design
- Started
- Last post
- 690 Responses
- discipler0
500.
- mrdobolina0
after further review, I would again like garett to eat feces.
How is what we are doing any different than what discipler is doing, sans foul language?
He is supporting his point with links, we are supporting our point with links.
- discipler0
I thought this thread was bout flinging feces?
- discipler0
meh, actually dobs, I've been typing mostly - presenting arguments for my position from my own little brain, based on the research I've been doing.
The link thing get's tiring because most don't read them, etc...
- shilohous0
open-faced pooo sammich
- Mimio0
Discipler, I really don't think it's honest to say that people who oppose ID are inflexible and discriminatory. If most scientists are shown facts, they admit their errors and adapt. ID is very contentious, and has very little to back itself up with right now and it seems determined to do things outside of the scieitific community.
- jevad0
I'm all for garretwest eating shit
- shilohous0
if dobs and jevad are ok with garett eatinf shit, well then damnit- so am i.
- Mimio0
Yeah, garret should go fuck himself.
- mrdobolina0
I prefer to refer to it as 'dung'
- discipler0
I'm not saying that they are all inflexible, mimio. I'm saying that a handful who are in the spotlight are willing to lie and do whatever it takes to censor ID and prevent the controversy being mentioned in schools. That said, everything I've read regarding peer review in particular, points to a tremendous sense of close mindedness to new ideas, especially those which challenge a major paradigm.
ID is not outside of the scientific community. It's very much part of it. With professors at major universities and research centers.
- Mimio0
Well ID has many tints and shades of being a politcal bum rush, the details of which have been discussed ad nauseum here. It's audacious to demand that a theory so amorphous be taight in schools. You really have to question that impatience, and examine what's giving it legs.
- discipler0
Mimio, Discovery is not advocating it be taught in schools. They are advocating that the entire story of Darwinian Evolution be taught. With all of it's holes. And that discussion about these controversial issues should be encouraged. I say that's good policy.
- discipler0
It comes down to a healthy education for students. A theory which has glaring problems should not be taught as the only solution to origins. And it certainly shouldn't be taught as fact, as it is in many universities. Students should be made aware that there is mounting scientific evidence which flies in the face of Darwinism.
- ********0
I'm gonna read through all of this later, cause I'm at work now.....but, IMHO, I believe that everyone is free to think what they what as long as they don't try to force their views on others. Personally, I think you have to be a crackhead to believe in ID. Its such a ridiculous concept, I just don't get how anyone with a brain can take it serious. Believe what you want but I think its insane to teach a completely mythical and unproven concept as fact to children who haven't fully developed there intellect yet.
- discipler0
well, "designnaked" you've demonstrated in your post that you know absolutely nothing about ID. If you disagree, tell me what you think Intelligent Design is.
My conclusion is that you would have to have your head in the sand to not see the clear scientific evidence which supports ID.
- mrdobolina0
wow, I agree with designaked.
- ********0
wow, I agree with designaked.
mrdobolina
(Nov 9 05, 09:12)----------------------
haha, its cool Dobs. I know we give each other shit a lot on here but its really all in good debate. No real harm ever meant on my end....even if I do occassionally call you a douche. That being said, all options are on the table....haha.
- kyl30
good morning, there's some coffee and donuts on the back table.
You guys been up all night?
- mrdobolina0
haha, put some clothes on, douche.