Intelligent design
- Started
- Last post
- 690 Responses
- mrdobolina0
do you think that it is a coincidence that the school board members in Kansas who passed those rules the other day are republicans. And that chriistians are their base?
- Mimio0
I've read portions of it, not compelling considering I had already read many responses that exposed the logical fallacies in most of his key analogies.
- discipler0
Really, mimio? Tell me about the portions you read and why you are skeptical. And detail the logical fallacies and why they are fallacious... i mean, if you don't mind.
- discipler0
And have you read any other books on this issue, like...
Icons Of Evolution
The Design Revolution
The Naked Emperor
Darwin On Trial
The Case For A Creator...just curious.
- Mimio0
//Christians are quite scientifically adept Mr. Dobolina...for instance they believe women can spontaeneously generate their own children and that humans can fly and walk on water.
- KuzII0
Kuzz, you are simply pasting the propaganda and lies that you are finding on internet searches. :)
It's nonsense. A again, notice it avoids the science. ;)
discipler
(Nov 9 05, 07:00)no seriously discipler, that is what happened. You can ask Behe himself! There was no peer-review! I'll go through some of the other claims you want.. But you can see that from Atchinsons own words, he's got no reason to discredit ID, being a god botherer himself
- ********0
garrette, you never know how many people are lurking and reading these threads and who are actually intellectually honest and want to honestly look at these issues. They may see a link or a book title and investigate it. :)
discipler
(Nov 9 05, 08:07)Couldn't they have read the exact same responses, links and answers back in posts 1-50?
This topic in it's entirity (posts, links and responses) is like a broken record.
- discipler0
ah, and this is the point where mimio shifts gears under pressure and resorts to petty vitriol. ;)
- KuzII0
Kuzz, you are definitely venturing into unfamiliar territory here. Books are most definitely peer reviewed and in many cases held in higher regard than published papers.
discipler
(Nov 9 05, 07:02)that's not true discipler! Behe's book Darwin's black box never went through the peer-review process! It was released for the layman! Yet Disco claims it WAS peer-reviewed!
- discipler0
true that, garrett.
I agree to disagree, kuzz.
- pavlovs_dog0
you are boring and stupid.
- ********0
Well discipler I admire that you have stuck to your guns through it all and I love how these other fellows go out of their way to try and prove you wrong.
It's his belief guys. You'll never change it so why bother?
Bother...hickbother...hickbother... (broken record)
- KuzII0
hey discipler, if you check this link
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entr…
you will see Behe has loads of peer-reviewed stuff, but not ONE on his much vaunted Irreducible Complexity theses - why is that?
- discipler0
yeah, i'm not into changing other's views. Just defending a position.
- pavlovs_dog0
you are boring and stupid
- KuzII0
discipler, my point about gong on about Behe's book is only that Discovery Institute is being wholly dishonest by saying it has been peer-reviewed! don't you think so??
- discipler0
His book was peer reviewed, Kuzz and it goes into great detail about Irreducible Complexity. :) Want to keep going in circles on this?
He has authored peer reviewed papers which discuss irreducible complexity. Go read dover trial day 10 & 11, which posted.
- discipler0
Not at all, kuz... as you will find out that he and the lawyer examining him under oath, went into detail about.
Again, anti-ID propaganda.
- KuzII0
anyway, here's another thing that Diso says was peer reviewd
Stephen Meyer, “The Origin of Biological Information and the Higher Taxonomic Categories” published in - Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington
Do you know what the Society of Washington said?
http://www.biolsocwash.org/id_st…
"Contrary to typical editorial practices, the paper was published without review by any associate editor; Sternberg handled the entire review process. The Council, which includes officers, elected councilors, and past presidents, and the associate editors would have deemed the paper inappropriate for the pages of the Proceedings because the subject matter represents such a significant departure from the nearly purely systematic content for which this journal has been known throughout its 122-year history."
so dont you think the Disco institute should take Meyer's paper off their list too??
- discipler0
and again, moot point.
Avoiding the science and taking a character/credential assassination approach.
Sounds like liberal politics, actually.