Intelligent design
Out of context: Reply #459
- Started
- Last post
- 690 Responses
- KuzII0
anyway, here's another thing that Diso says was peer reviewd
Stephen Meyer, “The Origin of Biological Information and the Higher Taxonomic Categories” published in - Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington
Do you know what the Society of Washington said?
http://www.biolsocwash.org/id_st…
"Contrary to typical editorial practices, the paper was published without review by any associate editor; Sternberg handled the entire review process. The Council, which includes officers, elected councilors, and past presidents, and the associate editors would have deemed the paper inappropriate for the pages of the Proceedings because the subject matter represents such a significant departure from the nearly purely systematic content for which this journal has been known throughout its 122-year history."
so dont you think the Disco institute should take Meyer's paper off their list too??