Ape to Man
- Started
- Last post
- 273 Responses
- discipler0
kld, do a word study of the hebrew word "day" used in genesis.
- mrdobolina0
so basically discipler, everything I learned in physical science class is flawed?
- ukit0
Along the same line of staggering improbabilty, how did one man fit 3.6 animals in one boat for forty days?
- kld0
don't miind me, I'm just stirring the ish
- ukit0
And I'm sure some nutcase somewhere has a webpage saying how it's possible, But that doesn't make it either probable or possible.
- discipler0
So if the world is only 6,000 years old, does that mean that primitive early life, dinosaurs and wooly mammoths all co-existed? Or did they each live for only a couple thousand years each? I'm just wondering how you compress time on such a massive scale like that and still take into account actual physical evidence from the fossil record.
ukit
(Aug 10 05, 11:02)
-----------------------------It's a valid question, ukit. You can get all your young earth - dinosaur questions answered here: http://www.answersingenesis.org/…
scroll down about halfway.
- Mal0
INSANE!
- mrdobolina0
Jobs at Answers in Genesis
Sorry, no job openings are available at this time because discipler is still employed here.
- mrdobolina0
Creation Magazine
=============Keep your family informed on the latest easy-to-understand science that confirms the Bible’s account of history! This unique full-color family magazine gives God the glory, refutes evolution and gives you the answers to defend your faith.
oh brother.
- Mal0
haha
- pavlovs_dog0
jesus saves.
- ukit0
Key phrase there: "science that confirms the Bible’s account of history."
All other science not available for rational consideration at this time.
- gruntt0
*drops off sandwiches and bottles of water.
- ********0
i guess 'carbon dating' is just another hoax.
cosmo
(Aug 10 05, 10:57)carbon dating isn't exact and it only goes back so far. You mean Potassium-Argon dating.
K-Ar
- ********0
so basically discipler, everything I learned in physical science class is flawed?
mrdobolina
(Aug 10 05, 11:03)actually, and I'm not supporting discipler, just think he has some valid points, yes it is flawed, because it's taught in a way that makes one think it's absolute, when in reality it's relative. there's no such thing as an exact science.
- cosmo0
I don't remember anything about K-Ar dating jaz. u got any links?
sorry, carbon-14 dating goes about upto 50,000. Not really sure how accurate that is, but i've read about it before.
http://www.c14dating.com/int.htm…
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu…
- Sonar0
MJ broke all evolution boundries..!
in 3 albums he went from a black dude to I'm not too sure!So who's scared of death?
Who want's to find a different planet to live on - this one's fu".....!
that's a whole different thread I believe..
- ********0
cosmo, Radio-Carbon dating is used for objects that contain Carbon, hence the name. Potassium-Argon dating is used to date extremly old minerals such as the Pre-Cambrian Shield that exists in certain areas of the world. Whatever rock types, such as igneous granitoids, etc, that contain the consituent minerals such as Potassium and Argon.
One of the most interesting things about so-called 'absolute dating' is at the Mid-Oceanic Ridges. The oldest ridges left due to subduction, are Jurassic in age. That relatively young in terms of the Geologic Time Scale. Date it soon or lose it forever. I think they lose something like 1 cm per year. Doesn't sound like much but it is to scientists.
- Sonar0
So we have an Ape to Man to Clone both and back to the start..
do you think we are on some big devolution spiral?
ending up at where we started - not an Ape but just as dumb?
- ********0
Radio-Carbon dating is used heavily in anthropologic studies. It's useless to Evolutionary Geologists.