Brexit
- Started
- Last post
- 1,920 Responses
- lowimpakt0
- isn't it a response to Jon Snow's rumour rather than the new deal amendment?Fax_Benson
- yep, I was joking, sorry.lowimpakt
- ah, my fault. looks like both are trueFax_Benson
- although his real statement was basically saying the same thinglowimpakt
- Fax_Benson0
All these hard brexiters keep insisting that the Irish border is a non-issue - principally because there's a piece-of-piss easy technical solution, but the only thing that ties us to the backstop is if no technical solution is found.
- we can fix it, easy!
- want to put that into writing?
fuck noFax_Benson - they've had 2 years to get the tech solution at least presented as a white paper. There's zero presented by the leave side.shapesalad
- we can fix it, easy!
- shapesalad0
May's voice is on the verge of disappearing... she sounds terrible... what at tattered finish to this Brexit nonsense. 2 years to get this sorted out, already had it voted down in the biggest rejection for decades... Pretty clear, Brexit as a concept doesn't work.
- *what a* typoshapesalad
- of course brexit works. put in some barbed wire and customs at the northern irish border just like it used to be and we're goldenhans_glib
- just needs a bit of a wash and put back it's feet and Brexit is good to go, all over againIanbolton
- it almost certainly isn't the finish.fadein11
- well hans, the problem then is you break the good Friday agreement... so then you're back to square one...shapesalad
- If USA is racing to the bottom, no doubt we'll land on Great Britainrobotron3k
- face first into the anusFax_Benson
- Fax_Benson1
Leaving Neverland
- PhanLo1
- hard brexitBluejam
- lolKrassy
- awkward semi brexitFax_Benson
- shapesalad1
My predicition: Delay, 2nd ref, no Brexit.
- scrap that. I think revoke article 50. 2nd ref. no Brexit.shapesalad
- Now don't see EU extending it. It'll be a last minute retraction of article 50.shapesalad
- I predict hard Brexit, then next year Breturn.Krassy
- ********4
- PhanLo0
- YouTube comment: "What the hell is she wearing around her neck? EU chains ?" LOLKrassy
- Brexit show way better that Trump 2019, you Brits always have to show the USA up don't cha!?robotron3k
- so much bling around her neck, wrist, ears. She's not a woman of the people. She's all about the money...shapesalad
- Ianbolton0
Such a waste of time, money, resources and completely distracting us from all of the things that currently really matter in the world. But ya know, BREXIT innit?! I think this country is at breaking point (not like Nigel Farage's poster though) more from our distrust of politicians and the media to do anything of any importance
- and it's all based on an advisory vote where a lot of old folk dream of the good old days, some dreamed of 350m and unicorns and some saw it as a chance to...shapesalad
- ..stick a finger up to the gov / experts / those perceived above them. All an advisory vote. Not binding. Could have been explored further to figure out...shapesalad
- .. an internal solution to satisfy those pissed off with the whole system, both EU and uk gov, pissed off at eastern europeans and arabs taking over their localshapesalad
- high streets, pissed off at zero hour contracts and no support from the Torys for the working person... etc... but no, TM got a bee in her bonnet.shapesalad
- Fax_Benson0
"It’s as if someone has popped a grey wig on Munch’s The Scream, then cast it an ITV drama about the female governor of a category-A prison."
Maybe not her best but she's set a very high bar.
- the self-satisfied-smug... tone of that piece is enough to make me want to vote for brexithans_glib
- "Parliament has said no twice hasn’t Mrs May heard of the metoo movement."shapesalad
- shapesalad1
No deal Brexit in theory off the table, though technically still gonna happen unless EU agrees delay or UK withdrawn A50.
- This is after almost 2 years since the vote. Nothing else agreed upon. Total cost and loss = £££,£££,££££....shapesalad
- It's insanity Shape, insaaaniiitty.PhanLo
- Bluejam0
"The House of Commons was a Benny Hill chase on acid, running through a Salvador Dali painting in a spaceship on its way to mad infinity and beyond"
- is voting for the same thing over and over until you get the answer you want a good thing or a bad thing now?Fax_Benson
- who knows but it's a winning strategy ...
https://www.youtube.…Bluejam
- shapesalad3
Theresa May and others say a 2nd referendum would be an insult to the people, that they'd be asked again until they gave the correct answer, and how many referendums would be required until they gave the correct answer? etc...
Meanwhile MPs vote against Theresa Mays deal once, then twice and now there's talk of presenting it to MP's a third time - see above arguments for why this is defying her own reasoning...
Not to mention it's been 3 years near since the public referendum, a fair amount of time for opinion to change. Yet we're looking at a few weeks between the MP's vote, and now a week between the 2nd and 3rd vote.
- lowimpakt0
the only reason to not run a 2nd referendum is to keep the Tory party together and in power.
The ERG and DUP would hate it if the 2nd referendum showed a majority not in favour of brexit.
Referendums only work well when the people voting have a really good understanding on what they are voting on and the full implications of their vote.
The British public are probably more informed now that they were when the vote happened so it only makes sense to have another one.
- How do you really know if people are more informed? Running another won't fix the first one. And people will not forget the first one.Fax_Benson
- I would suggest it's an obvious fact that the public are generally better informed now than before, no?********
- yeah, but you can't prove it - certainly not in any sense that will convince everyone that we need to do it againFax_Benson
- what would the choice be? May deal / No deal / remain? you'd split the vote 3 ways. And May's deal isn't even backed by the government that negotiated it.Fax_Benson
- When would you hold it? Who would run the campaigns? What if it was 52/48 the other way? How would you even get it through the Commons?Fax_Benson
- there's been no more thought put into a second referendum than there was for the first.Fax_Benson
- and this is just the the withdrawal agreement. We'd need another referendum in 5 years when we realise we didn't understand the future arrangementsFax_Benson
- the bed is shatFax_Benson
- fucking lol at the idea that "the public are generally better informed now..."hans_glib
- There's a lot of people who don't care what will happen, even if it will make their lives worse for many years. Still think go ahead with it for Mad Max reasonsPhanLo
- Remain MPs keep saying 'nobody voted to be worse off' - there's fucking people on the news saying that's exactly what they did, deliberately.Fax_Benson
- being better informed isn't the same as understanding all implications. Voting on something when you have no idea of implications is foolish.lowimpakt
- After the 2nd referendum there should be 3rd to make sure the (even more informed by then) voters are really sure what they want. Then a 4th one, ad infinitum.Krassy
- there won't be a 2nd referendum, would cause more problems than Brexit (possibly)fadein11
- hans_glib1
1000SFA!








