Who's Hot Sauce is this?
- Started
- Last post
- 13 Responses
- err
Didn't someone here make this?
I bought it at my local grocery store in Brooklyn.
- mrpt0
- err2
- Yup good stuff! Sharing his link for the uninitiated: http://adoboloco.com…mrpt
- err1
Its great btw!
- scarabin1
it's excellent stuff
- moldero0
love the name
- monospaced0
Just saw it in a hot sauce shop in Brooklyn.
- and I recently finished off the 4 pack I bought at launchmonospaced
- detritus1
I keep meaning to buy some of this - I wonder if he's got any stockists in London.
And, if not, I wonder if I could help him find one?
:)
- davey_g0
I have a few of those, great stuff! Not a bad bottle to look at either, main reason I bought it, duh.
- garbage0
has anybody tried the habanero or ghost? i might have to cop some of this.
- bzsaw6
Hey Guys... Just saw this link in my referrer's, haven't been here in awhile. Thank you for the kind words... Been crazy busy building our small family company. Glad some of you have had a chance to try it out. Actually going to be in the kitchen all day Friday bottling our newest flavor.
Aloha,
- chukkaphob0
Congrats @bzsaw!
- chukkaphob3
BTW, @err, the thread title should read "*Whose Hot Sauce is this?" and not "Who's Hot Sauce is this?"
- Who is Hot Sauce? Is this?sarahfailin
- Who is "Hot Sauce is this?"chukkaphob
- Who Sauce? <--- Pidgin English from Hawaii Dats Why!bzsaw
- That mistake is an easy one. The apostrophe s is also used to denote ownership. chukka's is not chukka is.monospaced
- So who's can be read as something owned by that who.monospaced
- No, I don't think so, mono. "Whose" is the proper replacement for who's when discussing ownership.nb
- Who's got the knowledge? @nb does. That's who.chukkaphob
- Whose mistake was the "...something owned ..." one above? @monospaced'schukkaphob
- Mono is right, it denotes ownership. For ex: Where's my mind.
Where is the place thar has taken possession of your mind since you have clearly lost it.prospect - whoissureshot
- I am hot sauce is thisset
- Who is this hot, sauce?prospect
- I was agreeing nb. I wasn't arguing.monospaced
- I think it's one of those special cases like its/it's. "Who's" is for "who is" while "whos" is for posession and "whose" is the feminine of "whos".prospect
- @prospect nope, mono was not right - who's does NOT denote ownershipchukkaphob
- Who’s is a contraction of who is or who has. Whose is the possessive form of who or which.chukkaphob
- exactlymonospaced
- Yes.prospect
- Good. Finally both of you learned.chukkaphob
- I have always agreed with mono because he clearly said "That mistake is an easy one.". He never said whose was incorrect.prospect
- I was just adding stupid explanations where there didn't be any like the rest of you. Basically, this was a "I guess we'll have to disagree to agree" situation.prospect
- haha, me too, my bad, explained for no fucking good reason at all :/monospaced
- It was fun though.prospect
- Good times, dudes. Yeah.chukkaphob
- So, we're in agreement? Who's is not acceptable for possessive. It doesn't mean "belonging to who." Whose is correct.nb
- OH, yes, I see. Mono was saying it's an easy mistake. Never miiiind.nb
- I was high.monospaced
- LOLchukkaphob
- http://ecx.images-am…prospect