Adobe Dreambeaver
- Started
- Last post
- 41 Responses
- teh0
- monospaced0
so glad I'm a designer and not a web coder
- tredesigns0
All I do is html and css. Dreamweaver visual editor write shit markup that I have to go and hand fix so i say why bother and write it myself. don't get me wrong i like code hints and custom snippets but DW never did it for me. Just starting a project is a multi step process vs coda's 1 step.
- scruffics0
i love it. some people don't. have tried their suggestions (Espress, Coda, TextMate etc.) and still went back to DW every time
- detritus0
This be troll thread?
- reanimate0
I use the 'Beaver. What do you want to know?
- section_0140
Get Aptana. It's free and it's awesome.
- d_rek0
Coda
- < Pretty unbeatablemeffid
- mac only?FallowDeer
- Mac only... I guess that's the only caveatd_rek
- bored2death0
I prefer Adobe Potatoshop myself.
- Sometimes I use Adobe Firecrotch in places of Pototoshop.CygnusZero4
- animatedgif0
it's a complete joke. Especially if you bought it
- orrinward20
I use SublimeText2. Love it.
- numero10
I use it in split! I type the code.
- aaux0
As a straight code editor is it fairly decent. The people hating on it are assuming it's the same drag and drop wysiwyg editor from back in the FrontPage days. I used it for probably 4 years as my primary code editor and switched to sublime text 2 last year as it had a few more features that I needed.
- 3030
On Mac RubyMine is my choice, even if I am working on non-rails project - kicks Coda2 to the kerb. On Win, I prefer VS2012 Express for Web.
Sublime2 is also pretty good.
- dbloc0
still use beaver
- fourth0
I used DW for a long time. Learned on it. I think the workflow takes a lot of time and I don't like the interface at all. When I was a beginner it made more sense but as I got better I wanted something simpler. I really love Espresso because of the live preview when editing CSS. No more clicking refresh over and over and over.