HAARP and Haiti - Conspiracy?

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 176 Responses
  • differenz

    So according to Arthur Goldwag, here are 13 reasons to suspect HAARP caused Haiti quake:
    http://www.godlikeproductions.co…

    Is someone trying to depopulate Haiti?

    "Haiti is prime real estate once you get all the locals off it. The US military is now in control, without firing a shot. I gotta hand it to the Illuminati, they are very smart. They can take over a country and murder thousands and then be thanked from the bottom of the victims hearts. Very smooth. The Illuminati have a pact with the devil, not the Haitians."

    also:

    Haiti, HAARP, and conspiracy theorists
    http://www.boingboing.net/2010/0…

    HAARP:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hig…

    ***

    Opinions?

  • airey0

  • airey0

    The main thing that I learned about conspiracy theory is that conspiracy theorists actually believe in a conspiracy because that is more comforting. The truth of the world is that it is chaotic. The truth is, that it is not the Jewish banking conspiracy or the grey aliens or the 12 foot reptiloids from another dimension that are in control. The truth is more frightening, nobody is in control. The world is rudderless.

    Yes, there is a conspiracy, in fact there are a great number of conspiracies that are all tripping each other up. And all of those conspiracies are run by paranoid fantasists and ham-fisted clowns. If you are on a list targeted by the CIA, you really have nothing to worry about. If however, you have a name similar to somebody on a list targeted by the CIA, then you are dead.

    "The Mindscape of Alan Moore" (2003)

  • sequoia0

    earthquakes happen. this is a fact.

    • caused by the illuminati all holding hands and jumping up and down in the same spot.airey
    • you can take that fact to the bank.airey
  • version30

    airey, you're cracking me up today! lol :D

    • makes a change then. i'll attempt to get back on poor-form business as usual sir.airey
    • :( fucker.version3
  • bitPic0

  • bliznutty0

    US Quake Test Goes “Horribly Wrong”, Leaves 500,000 Dead In Haiti - By: Sorcha Faal, and as reported to her Western Subscribers

    A grim report prepared by the Russian Northern Fleet for Prime Minister Putin is stating today that the catastrophic earthquake that has devastated the Island of Haiti was the ‘clear result’ of a United States Navy test of one of its ‘earthquake weapons’ planned to be used by the Americans upon the Persian Nation of Iran but had gone ‘horribly wrong’.

    The Northern Fleet has been monitoring US Naval movements and activities in the Caribbean since 2008 when the Americans announced their intention to re-establish their Forth Fleet that had been disbanded in 1950, and which was responded to by the Motherland when later that year a Russian flotilla led by nuclear powered cruiser Peter the Great began their first exercises in this region since the ending of the Cold War.

    Though virtually unknown to the American people, the use, and perfection, of earthquake weapon technology has a decade’s long history that began with the former Soviet Unions exploding of a 10 megaton nuclear bomb in September, 1978 and then ‘redirecting’ its shockwave towards Iran where it resulted in a catastrophic 7.4 magnitude earthquake, an event which hastened the downfall of the US backed regime headed by the Shah....

    http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/in…

    hmmm..

  • version30

    this entire thread is a timeline, and that's why people should read if they are going to contribute and filter popular topics
    http://www.qbn.com/topics/619719…

  • Meeklo0

    • may as well be 'the boogeyman must be destroyed' while we're angry at fictional beings.airey
    • this would be a great one to bring to a tea party rally.DrBombay
  • bitPic0
  • airey0

    i love that insane people post all kinds of crazy on their blogs and because it's published someplace on the net, other insane people treat it as legit.

  • airey0

    i'll give you a genuine conspiracy. ready? hold on to you socks.

    the lack of schools in the US to teach critical literacy as part of the standard programs it seems unless you study journalism or some related language topic it doesn't get taught, which is why so many of these nuts simply believe whatever they read, even if it's on an unedited information superhighway port-o-call.

    • the person who said it was on tv in a suit, just like the newsmanversion3
    • sad there are so many flavors of truth now and journalism has the equivalence of calling a football gameversion3
    • i think people should not be so lazy and seek facts. like in fable 2.airey
    • you know airey, sometime I go out and get books. you know the tree thing. now equate taught history to truth is somehow a long stretch.GeorgesII
    • is somehow a long stretch. because at the end of the day history is written by those in control and can be changed ever decade if they feel so..GeorgesII
    • daily if they wish too, as long as you don't delve into it you will accept it. first thing first learn to unlearn and chose your own path.GeorgesII
    • your own path.GeorgesII
    • the ones that believe whatever they read. As in the general population that takes the msm as reality?__TM
  • bitPic0

  • fresnobob0

  • Gucci0

    • I liked the GIF is saw on that page you linked.Gucci
    • awesomeness™airey
  • MrOneHundred0

    Didn’t Tom Hanks already beat the Illuminati?

  • surfito0

    • wowbenfal99
    • that guy is fucking awesomeidentity
    • doesnt look like blood.Hombre_Lobo
    • I can't stand Anderson Cooper, but that was a very human act.Point5
    • ....who would do anything any different. I respect it - but come on. Its not like to took the hit for himMachuse
  • __TM0

    conspiracy theories are always ridiculous.
    Until they are proven true, that is...
    Israeli organ harvesting of war victims, CIA involvement in JFK assassination, secret CIA torture prisons, FBI involvement in Oklahoma City bombing and 1993 WTC attack, Irangate, GLADIO, MKULTRA, pharmaceutical companies testing on third world population etc etc... once tinfoil hat topics, now established facts.

    • I’d love to see your hard copies.MrOneHundred
    • just because one or a few may be true doesn't mean they all are. this is the problem with conspiracy nuts.airey
  • GeorgesII0

    its ok, give or take 30 or 40 years and they become facts
    here's where to begin
    http://www.newworldorderreport.c…

  • GeorgesII0

    I'll just give you an head up if you don't read the article because the design of the site hurts your eyes
    - 1990 Testimony of Nayirah:A 15-year-old girl named “Nayirah” testified before the U.S. Congress that she had seen Iraqi soldiers pulling Kuwaiti babies from incubators, causing them to die. The testimony helped gain major public support for the 1991 Gulf War, but — despite protests that the dispute of this story was itself a conspiracy theory — it was later discovered that the testimony was false. The public relations firm Hill & Knowlton, which was in the employ of Citizens for a Free Kuwait, had arranged the testimony.It turned out that she had taken acting lessons on request of the CIA and was actually the niece of a major politician in Kuwait.Nayirah was later disclosed to be Nayirah al-Sabah, daughter of Saud bin Nasir Al-Sabah, Kuwaiti ambassador to the USA.The Congressional Human Rights Caucus, of which Congressman Tom Lantos was co-chairman, had been responsible for hosting Nurse Nayirah, and thereby popularizing her allegations. When the girl's account was later challenged by independent human rights monitors, Lantos replied, "The notion that any of the witnesses brought to the caucus through the Kuwaiti Embassy would not be credible did not cross my mind... I have no basis for assuming that her story is not true, but the point goes beyond that. If one hypothesizes that the woman's story is fictitious from A to Z, that in no way diminishes the avalanche of human rights violations." Nevertheless, the senior Republican on the Human Rights Caucus, John Edward Porter, responded to the revelations "by saying that if he had known the girl was the ambassador's daughter, he would not have allowed her to testify."

    - Gulf of Tonkin Never Happened:The Gulf of Tonkin Incident is the name given to two separate incidents involving the Democratic Republic of Vietnam and the United States in the waters of the Gulf of Tonkin. On August 2, 1964 two American destroyers engaged three North Vietnamese torpedo boats, resulting in the sinking of one of the torpedo boats.This was also the single most important reason for the escalation of the Vietnam War.After Kennedy was assassinated, the Gulf of Tonkin gave the country the sweeping support for aggressive military action against the North Vietnamese.

    The outcome of the incident was the passage by Congress of the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution, which granted President Lyndon B. Johnson the authority to assist any Southeast Asian country whose government was considered to be jeopardized by "communist aggression".In 2005, an internal National Security Agency historical study was declassified; it concluded that USS Maddox had engaged the North Vietnamese on August 2, but that there may not have been any North Vietnamese vessels present during the engagement of August 4. The report stated “It is not simply that there is a different story as to what happened; it is that no attack happened that night...”In truth, Hanoi's navy was engaged in nothing that night but the salvage of two of the boats damaged on August 2.In 1965, President Johnson commented privately: "For all I know, our Navy was shooting at whales out there."

    In 1981, Captain Herrick and journalist Robert Scheer re-examined Herrick's ship's log and determined that the first torpedo report from August 4, which Herrick had maintained had occurred—the "apparent ambush"—was in fact unfounded.In 1995, retired Vietnamese Defense Minister Vo Nguyen Giap, meeting with former Secretary of Defense McNamara, categorically denied that Vietnamese gunboats had attacked American destroyers on August 4, while admitting to the attack on August 2.In the Fall of 1999, retired senior CIA engineering executive S. Eugene Poteat wrote that he was asked in early August 1964 to determine if the radar operator's report showed a real torpedo boat attack or an imagined one.In October, 2005 the New York Times reported that Robert J. Hanyok, a historian for the U.S. National Security Agency, had concluded that the NSA deliberately distorted the intelligence reports that it had passed on to policy-makers regarding the August 4, 1964 incident. He concluded that the motive was not political but was probably to cover up honest intelligence errors.

    twice you went for war for nothing, still you think you're defending democracy..

  • moth0

    Fucking morons - all of you.

    Leave them alone airey. It's better just to watch them from a distance...