Too close for comfort.
- Started
- Last post
- 12 Responses
- kult
All familiar with http://hellomonday.com ?
Stumbled onto... http://www.loafcreative.com
- lvl_130
yeah, that's def. lifted.
the hello monday site is so nice.
- akrokdesign0
monday looks better also. :-)
- imadesigner0
Yes no.
- utopian0
more gooder.
- Point50
- one has to go, we can only have 5. lol.akrokdesign
- who the hell is that chick in the head band?dopepope
- kult0
Surprising considering the company has some decent work.
- version30
you guys are all crazy
- Projectile0
they are slightly similar, yes. But if I created one and saw the other I wouldn't be even slightly annoyed. Inspired by, if anything not ripped
- zenmasterfoo0
I think we should all agree on some standards for consideration here... work similar in functionality yet designed differently does not constitute a rip. work designed similarly yet modified enough to retain individuality should also remove it from a rip label.
we've seen enough rips posted here and other places to know what constitutes a real rip. code with the meta tags still showing the original designer's name and such. sites looking identical in design, including logo styles and colors, etc. this just doesn't qualify enough.
- bigtrick0
hellomonday:
loafcreative:
- gabe0
i rather disagree zen. that places entirely too much emphasis on the visual aspect of a site and zero on concept or execution (which in my opinion is generally more important anyway).
in this case you have a site that behaves in rather the same exact manner as another and it's obviously no coincidence. it's not like the endless number of portfolios that use an opensource technology such as lightbox.
in this case, someone spent a considerable amount of time developing a unique way to interact with a website and that should be respected.
it's the concept/execution which makes hello monday so unique, not the actual design. when that's infringed upon, i personally think it's fair to say "rip"