Politics
- Started
- Last post
- 33,772 Responses
- ********0
BRNK, how come no one comments on your threads? Is it because you are an uninteresting douche bag?
BRNK— A Douche Bag You Can Believe In®
- BonSeff0
- its unconstitutional. fact. and our great and glorious administration did nothign to fix the msitake********
- come on bon arnt u pissed your capt didnt fix the mess but supported it?********
- and if a gentleman supports such an idea, u must ask why? and what else would he support and why?********
- but cheers on bringing it up********
- its unconstitutional. fact. and our great and glorious administration did nothign to fix the msitake
- ukit0
It's meaningless at this point, but gives you a sense of where the voters are at if the next election was held today.
http://www.publicpolicypolling.c…
PPP (D) 2012 Presidential Survey
Obama v Huckabee
Barack Obama 48% [47%] (48%)
Mike Huckabee 41% [44%] (42%)Obama v Romney
Barack Obama 48% [47%] (49%)
Mitt Romney 39% [40%] (40%)Obama v Palin
Barack Obama 53% [52%] (51%)
Sarah Palin 38% [38%] (43%)Obama v Bush
Barack Obama 50%
Jeb Bush 37%- Interesting how, after all the shit Obama's taken, he still beats Huckabee and Romney by more than he beat McCain and trounces Palin and Bushukit
- and trounces Palin and Bush. McCain was actually one of the stronger candidates Rs had out thereukit
- The guy was handed the biggest bag of shit ever. 2 wars, dead economy, insurance prices jumping double digit percentages every year, wages stagnant for 8 years.DrBombay
- percentages every year, wages stagnant for 8 years. And these tits want it solved in 9 months with tax cuts. Fucking dummies.DrBombay
- yes increased spending and increased government will reduce deficit and make everything better********
- capitalism is the enemy to the usa and to iran and to every other nations that denounces such an idea that favors strong over weak********
- over weak.********
- good thing there is always a greater number of righteous weak people, over humble strong********
- voting is fine in numbers as long as rights are respected. but ppl have lsot touch with individual rights********
- instead they declare such bogus things as healthcare as an individual right.********
- HAHA. Where did you get that DailyKos you fuck? HAHA That is hilarious. Obama is a marxist you idiot.********
- Reagan and Both Bush's ran the debt out of control too, you fucking moronic monkey.DrBombay
- TheBlueOne0
"The AP is reporting that Bill Sparkman, a 51-year-old part-time Census field worker and occasional teacher, was found hanged to death in Kentucky with the word “FED” was scrawled on the dead man’s chest. Investigators are still trying to determine the motive, but “law enforcement officers have told the agency the matter is ‘an apparent homicide.'"
- http://www.perunamaa…********
- I posted that yesterday in this same thread!Josev
- http://www.perunamaa…
- ********0
- you're missing a few steps - to say the least********
- Well, that confirms it. The long term plan to dumb America down has reached fruition. Congrats.TheBlueOne
- Sure Fag. Thats what the jews said.********
- Obama didn't nationalize anything.zarkonite
- yea missing the step of making a common enemy of a particular demographic********
- hmm ....********
- Hitler rounded up the gays, but the only hating on gays is coming from McWoozDrBombay
- i was thinking a different group that has opposing philosophies with what is going on********
- wtf cares what you were thinking, hitler rounded up the gays too.DrBombay
- you're missing a few steps - to say the least
- ********0
Good morning all you whiny faggy liberal/communists, nice to see you today. I am glad to see europe and part of brainwashed America still produces hitler lovers, you boys would make him proud. Or should i say you silly boys would sure make hitler proud.
I wonder how many times Ukit played 'swords' with his life size version of hitler? Ukit did you get a little gay tom cruise in you from top gun? It's ok buddy.
- zzzzJonnyPompa
- This is a giant put on, right? Who are you really? Rand? Dinky?TheBlueOne
- ukit0
It's weird but you kinda get the sense of what it would be like to be in the middle of the civil rights battle 40 years ago listening to some of the comments in this thread. Seems like there are still a lot of angry racial feelings among some of you. Not to mention repressed homosexuality.
- ********0
Tell me where I am wrong?
- You mean besides bad design, spelling and typography?ukit
- viewpoint is one word, McIlliteracyBonSeff
- LOL, what the fuck have I got to do with this?Jnr_Madison
- i love how the bad spellin' protest sign making fundie tards have permeated our community! congrats, moronBonSeff
- are you really in dallas? jesus christ, i hope notBonSeff
- wait, I thought Jnr was gay before the QBN libs showed up.Point5
- at last, point5, a man who knows his facts.Jnr_Madison
- I wasn't going to let you go out like that Jnr; not on my watch.Point5
- ********0
Left or Right wing, it really doesn't matter. Good ideas don't follow "party lines", they just exist. The true sign of political ignorance comes in the form of a "us against them" mentality.
- I would say if anyone's guilty of cultivating this mentality, it's Obama.designbot
- Never heard Obama once say, If you're not with us, you're against us. SIncerely, George W.BonSeff
- Bonseff correctly guessed my reference********
- sounds liek a shot to denounce republican ideas becuase one dude said soemthing.********
- and i think most peopel denouncing obama are denouncing his ideas regardless of party********
- there goes that misspelling again ;)EightyDeuce
- You and Mcwooz are trolling anonymous pussies.DrBombay
- i denounce your crappy
werd-smithinBonSeff - more deflection. even with perfect spelling, there would just be some other excuse.********
- we wouldn't deflect anything if you could formulate a coherent sentenceBonSeff
- we don't comprehend your pointBonSeff
- consider a tutor?BonSeff
- there probably is a free program at a public library that can help you debateBonSeff
- so when my spelling is criticized , u had expected me to understand that meant u didnt understand me? that seems like poor communication********
- seems like poor communication. but i guess now on ill slow it down for ya********
- lose the anonymity you punk bitch, stand up for what you believe in.DrBombay
- DrBombay0
I am no longer going to engage deathboy, McWooz or Angryknob in a serious fashion anymore. You all have character flaws.
- I'm still convinced at least a couple of them are just regulars trolling for LOLz. No one is actually that dumb.ukit
- absolutely agree.DrBombay
- but why? you gotta be a lonely mother fucker to troll on me.. jeez man.. shit aint even flatteringBonSeff
- just super sad.BonSeff
- bon are u referring to me asking you about your 4th amendment video post?********
- i thought that was super clear.********
- trollDrBombay
- no, people are that dumbBattleAxe
- Amen TBO.DCDesigns
- ********0
I'm curious. Are there any government programs that are acceptable or right wing approved?
- Anything that blows up brown people I think is acceptable. There is no cost ceiling for that.TheBlueOne
- ...wow. nails.BonSeff
- if only the us put as much into mexico as they did to destroy & rebuild iraq - the emigration problemBonSeff
- would have been one of those 2 birds, one stone situationsBonSeff
- i dont mind funding for public education, thats a benefit to all.********
- trollDrBombay
- freitag0
i have both a left and right wing else i can't fly...
- ukit0
O HAI i iz dethbwoy i cunt tipe a sen tanz core ektally und i rei fuz 2 evan tri evun aftur pepul maik phun ov me phor not beein abl 2 spel dozunz ov tiemz. butt u shuld lizin 2 whut i hav 2 saiy beecuz i has a lots of impotent ponz, and i is a dep thenkur. gov ur ment iz baad. k thanks bai.
- monkeyshine0
after listening to that stupid Beck interview with Couric, I come back to the question: why does the media, why does anyone give idiotic, inflammatory airbags air time? Every time Bill Maher mentions Sarah Palin I want to punch him in the face. And this BS with Beck...honestly.
- Yea Maher is a little annoying sometimes, but he shouldn't be lumped in with Beck.JonnyPompa
- Couric’s salary comes to an estimated $15 million a year. Think about it.TheBlueOne
- CBS also owns the publishing company putting out Beck's book. Do the math.TheBlueOne
- ********0
Wow.... This thread has turned an all time turn for the worse. Seems like some folks true feelings are coming to light. Pretty disgusting and bordering on the ridiculous. I hope I never run into any of you ( you know who are). Because you won't want to run into me.
- ********0
Revolutionary on deck. My pixels are weapons.
- Operation R.O.F.L.M.A.O. has commenced sirukit
- bummer, looks like the girl in the foreground didnt have all black to wear for their little field trip...DrBombay
- pasty-faced nerd-ninjasDrBombay
- yes the revolution shall be full of belly laughs. and sharp, cutting truths to the white underbelly of idiots********
- ********0
Well if that is what u think. So be it. I try to condense my messages as much as possible, and as quickly as possible. And try to fit them into the comments section, so as there will be more posting room available per page. We rarely go back more then 2 pages to reread/respond too things. There are typos, but the typos do not make the message unreadable, perhaps sometimes i condense too much, thinking you would have the intelligence to fill in the gaps based on what is being talked about. I can see that would be trouble for certain minds. If so i blame myself. However I do also see the behavior traits amongst a lot of you that shows when faced with truths you would rather not recognize, you turn to insults, and mob mentality. So taking that into account it is hard to place value and time into proper explanation when you know it will be followed up with "troll" or some other misplaced random insult. Which i now fully expect on this post for saying such a thing. My motives for still doing such a thing, even though i know the probable results, are of concern only to me.
Now for a few things. Bon seff. I am curious about your post "Franken reads the 4th Amendment to Justice Department". The use of the video is clearly favoring Franken calling out how the roving wiretaps are unconstitutional. So i took the understanding that you are against such policies in the patriot act. An act passed under the Bush administration but supported in the current administration, which also was supported by the current president. If u support the patriot act, or a majority of its part i apologize and was mistaken, but if you don't I'm asking how you feel about the current presidents support for such policies, and if you have questioned the particular motives, ones said and ones not said? Especially the ones not said. And then taking that into consideration wouldn't that make u question other policies of this administration because the motives would likely be the same as the last administration, which were heavily scrutinized. I came to the conclusions of power and control. Those are mine I'm not sure if those are yours. But that is why we have questions. And if we are on the same page then I must ask, if a person who seeks such things in one policy would that not be there goal in another?
sequoia
Left or Right wing, it really doesn't matter. Good ideas don't follow "party lines", they just exist. The true sign of political ignorance comes in the form of a "us against them" mentality.
comments:
I would say if anyone's guilty of cultivating this mentality, it's Obama.Never heard Obama once say, If you're not with us, you're against us. SIncerely, George W.
Bonseff correctly guessed my reference
So now instead of comment space I'll respond properly. First thing is what you said goes without saying. And from that it jumped to partisan jabs. Designbot said Obama cultivates that mentality, which I'm unsure if it meant cultivates the bipartisanship, or partisanship. So then on to bonseff's which was elevating the left over the right, based on some sort of bush statement which i don't know about. Which shows the partisanship even when the point is non partisanship. It may be fact but was clearly intended to promote one over the other. And was followed up with sequoia saying "Bonseff correctly guessed my reference". And if thats the case I find the whole non partisanship idea had nothing to do with non-partisanship, but simply a setup, to promote the left over the right. And short responses gave no room for the counter point that Obama has said the same thing, just not implicitly. He says it in many others ways, such as this healthcare will be passed. The message is the same. And many other ways he says the same thing without saying a word. Body language, a sigh, or a representative. The fact is party politics = party politics. And i was only calling out such a fake handshake across the isle BS to push ones own partisan agenda.
And you DrBombay. I can see your motivation is primarily being recognized. You get so upset when no one engages in your insults. But i'll humor you. I do remember you wanted to know who I was so you would know if i was a troll or not. A troll is a person who has no fixed belief system, and engages in heated discussions against a popular majority in order to receive attention regardless of insult or compliment. I haven't switched my views. And I try to abstain from engaging in mindless insults. I know what I am saying is right, and im not throwing any change-ups. I may be on the minority side here, and thats just a coincidence. Or a common occurrence since through history the "right" decision is usually the harder one which makes it the least popular. But those statistics are not of importance and in no way am i trying to justify an unpopular belief by a historical context. Just base it on your capability to think. So hopefully that clears that up. Now i question why so earnestly don't like anonymity. Would my name change my words in any context? Doesn't anonymity help keep bias out of such arguments? I can't see any benefit in telling u my name or everything about me. I expect that u would try to use it as some sort of character assassination, or you may think that i am in a position of importance and are concerned about my opinion of you. In which case... what did u say.... you'd be a punk bitch and change your beliefs. So i see absolutely no reason in saying my name since u have no way to verify anything. So let me protect you from you from yourself. Also I'd say your actions fit the definition of a troll pretty well, especially since your favorite engagement is of some childish name calling.
There ya go. Likely too much for you to read or wrap your minds around. And is primarily a waste of time for me, and I'm not in the habit of wasting time, but on the chance you truly did not understand , and clarification was not asked for which says so so much, I owe it solely to myself to clarify such things, and the ease of mind that i did what i could do.
- lacklustre, pedestrian, middle of the road bourgeois intellectual stance********
- thanks for defining "toll" for us. and overlooking the catch all politics of us political parties while dismissing them as narrowly partisan********
- narrowly partisan, without seeing the historical continuity between administrations regardless of party********
- can u give examples? pretty indirect and i can only assume your taking the post farther********
- then it wasnt meant to be taken.********
- oh and it wasnt meant as luster, but it is a middle of the road simple statement. seemed the need for clarification was needed on mundane things********
- needed on mundane things. no intention of wowness or some sort of pedestal. just clarification.********
- lacklustre, pedestrian, middle of the road bourgeois intellectual stance
- BonSeff0
deathboy,
1. you cant have this conversation with us, unless you sack up and stop being a troll.
2. your fallacy is that we all blindly follow Obama
- well if u think im trolling u miss a lot. and i didnt suggest u blindly follow obama, i asked a question which dependent upon your answer********
- upon your answer might tell me if u personally do or not.********
- and "all" is not a term i was using. mainly focusing on you with the section of questions.********
- if u got all from my unlisted people who act a certain way, that would still not pertain to the questions asked of u.********
- and the fact u still call me a troll, without explanation of reason tells me a lot too********
- well if u think im trolling u miss a lot. and i didnt suggest u blindly follow obama, i asked a question which dependent upon your answer
