letterform crit
- Started
- Last post
- 10 Responses
- epigraph
I drew this as a logo for myself, and was wondering how the letterforms look to everyone. I know the whole thing needs a little cleaning up, but I am looking for opinions on kerning, proportions, etc.
- D_Dot0
The word "pig" jumps out at me.
- ********0
connect G and R
- ********0
Looks 1940'ish, is that the look that you where trying to achieve?
- yes, but a little more modern with the consistent line width and rounded endsepigraph
- BaskerviIle0
The image “http://jamesguild.com/img/epigr... cannot be displayed, because it contains errors.
- works fine?!PSYKHO
- weird, can't see itBaskerviIle
- i got that toolocustsloth
- me neitherkelpie
- The image above is from his site. Strange...PSYKHO
- chuparosa0
Really cool! I agree with digdre. How about a different shape on the base of the p? The connection with the p and the h seems loose.
- dirtydesign0
the p's look wierd..connect the rounded shape to the descender maybe
- ********0
I agree that the lowercase "p" in (2) instances needs to be connected or closer together on the base. Other than that I like the direction.
- bulletfactory0
The image “http://jamesguild.com/img/epigr... cannot be displayed, because it contains errors.
- epigraph0
The P shape is something I have been fighting with. When I connected the base it seemed to mess with the baseline and kerning.
I based the letters on citadel and Kuenstler script which have similar p's. I think Bickham is like that also.
I will wrestle with it some more...thanks! =)