Nikon vs Canon
- Started
- Last post
- 23 Responses
- dibec0
I have shot with both. I think the "L" series is a line above Nikon. I believe the builds are a lot better, and you dont get a lot image degradation due to glass. They both produce some fantastic lens. Simply whatever lifts up your skirt.
- jaylarson0
when you get yr hands on the 14-24 from nikkon, you'll know that the battlefield has changed. ridiculous lens. i am of the mind that from 14-400, i would rather use nikon lenses. 14-24, 24-70, 70-200, 200-400. All but the last are 2.8, sharp. The 14-24 has a built in lens hood, which does prevent filters, at the cost of taking industry changing optics. Srsly.
i can understand why you would think that. L lenses are really awesome when you get a good copy (way more often than not, sorry for the late answer capn_ron).
i need to save for a year, then we'll see if canon has released a replacement for the 5d. if not, i'll get the nikon d300 or perhaps there'll be a replacement shortly.
either way, i win. high fives!
- ...get a good copy, they are much, better than 3rd parties. One should hope with the money canon has.jaylarson
- Personal preference is often key. i haven't bought into any dslr system. i am free to choose.jaylarson
- Sorry, Jesus made his choice.
I dont think you want to burn in hell by using Nikon, do you? :)Meeklo
- ********0
http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon…
if would keep my nikon if i has this.
I used this for a day. i shot at night in the low light hotel room. still perfect. still fast.