web 2.0
- Started
- Last post
- 32 Responses
- jevad
you can take your bubbly typfaces, your vibrant greens and blues, and your shitty templates, and stick them up your arses
- bradpitt0
why the anger my love?
- algorithm0
amen brutha
- ********0
All Your Atlas Are Belong To Us.
- kyl30
I am with you!
- Jaline0
I don't even get what Web 2.0 is.
- enobrev0
that's the first logical thing i've heard about web2.0 yet.
- nocomply0
I don't even get what Web 2.0 is.
Jaline
(Jun 8 06, 12:22)Nobody does. Don't believe the hype.
- hiten0
me neither jalne.
- exador10
I'm kinda stuck in 2.0 madness over here...everything the company is doing lately is burried in it..
i kinda dig some of the design trends in re. to 2.0 looks..but jevad is right...it's all starting to look the fucking same...
i guess my job at the moment is to use the 2.0 stuff..but give it a fresher feel...so it doesn't get lost with all the rest of the lookalike sites out there...
- nocomply0
Me personally, I just upgraded to 3.0 last night. 2.0 was too confusing.
- ********0
so what the fuck is it
- -sputnik-0
i was in a meeting where this wanker went on and on about 2.0, so i asked him to define it and he couldn't.
sh*t for brains.
- kyl30
spent all day yesterday trying to decifer a brief and design a 2.0 web app.
feed back was 'Thats a decent start'
wtf does decent mean?
- bradpitt0
It's the next bill perkins.
- ********0
web 2.0 has waay more porn
- ********0
In all seriousness Atlas (Microsoft's answer to Ajax) is fucking suite.
I agree people have been just dropping this like the buzz word it is, but the capabilities of doing post backs without client refreshes and being able to store massive amounts of data to call in an instant to me is very exciting.
Technically this should be called Web 0.5 though, as AJAX has been around for years, and never utilized.
- kyl30
rounded corners, large html type,
here is some bs I found yesterday
http://www.ideasonideas.com/2006…
- exador10
hey jaline, hiten...
here's the lowdown..2.0 basically refers to all the sites out there that are using (amongst other things) AJAX technology and or Ruby on rails...
to give you an example, all the sites that allow users to interact with data, such as fhttp://www.thebeststuffinthewor...
http://www.flickr.com/for a fairly complete and exhausting link list...check out
http://www.emilychang.com/go/ehu…she's a pretty good designer and a sort of know-it-all when it comes to 2.0 shit...
and i mean that in a good way...from the looks of it, she knows just about everything when it comes to this stuff...
- Jaline0
I'm guessing that most Web 2.0 sites have the function of 'tags'.
- version30
don't balme web 2.0, forward compliancy, css, ajax, xml etc. for the balnd designs of those plastic wrapping everything in two or 3 columns
if people woiuld read books instead of rip sites, they wouldn't all look the same with different skins
web 2.0 is good fot the industry, good for the w3c, and a great motivation to browser providers to use standardized rendering engines across the board
the ability to develop for different browsers has made us learn more than we need to know
web 2.0 is a good start to something that has absolutely no industry standard.
Props to w3c as well for their 14 years of effort and documentation of syntax usage