Designing Ads
- Started
- Last post
- 55 Responses
- ********0
Did you get all that from a chain email or did you make it up k0na?
- CyBrainX0
It'll work if Nivea doesn't test on animals. They could even run a small disclaimer on the bottom. I agree with the comments on the type though. Take a look at some sports ads. Make it look much more aggressive.
- mr_snuggles0
// this is the kind of advertising the world needs more of...
- ********0
Been designing a few ad ideas, to send to potential clients
just thought I would see what everyone thinks
i34.photobucket.com/al... [jpg]
i34.photobucket.com/al... [jpg]
Bite
(Mar 20 06, 06:41)First one is cool.
Second one panders too much. Guys who sit on the couch don't think they're animals. They would of course fantasize about being a pro athelete. They are accutely aware that they're worthless tubs. They would like to be the guy in number one.Ads by and large are made by women. even if males come up with the concepts.
- mr_snuggles0
I think it's brillaint how you likened animals to male sports fans...
It may be a little too conceptual, but hopefully the client will see it's merits...
- ********0
shut up snuggles
- ********0
Did you get all that from a chain email or did you make it up k0na?
skt
(Mar 20 06, 09:28)neither.
Keep pushing the ads and post them again for round 2. Def push the rugby image and text. Nice start!
- ********0
I think something more like...
"Tested on arthritic squirrels..."
...would work better.
- ********0
wtf do you know kona? have you been in advertising?
- mr_snuggles0
word up snuggles
not_lebowski
(Mar 20 06, 10:04)and a word up to you too...
- ********0
yeah that shit does annoy me
- ********0
wtf do you know kona? have you been in advertising?
not_lebowski
(Mar 20 06, 10:07)maybe not much. but i have a portfolio to show for what i do know, being 31 and working professionally in the industry since 1997.
so, the question is, what do YOU know?
- ********0
Isn't yr point that the animal does need Nivea?
Point is-it is animal tested just not by Fang the beagle.
Or am I being think?
- ********0
Isn't yr point that the animal does need Nivea?
Point is-it is animal tested just not by Fang the beagle.
Or am I being think?
xenicon
(Mar 20 06, 10:32)The point is, it was tested on animals, the animals being the rugby players. Which is ok as a concept as long as Nivea or their parent company doesn't have anything to do with animal testing.
The beagle I posted doesn't really have anything to do with it. I shouldn't have posted it. Some people are just too easily confused.
- ********0
skt, you were right- argument by emotional appeal is effective. My fault I read the original as "not tested by animals" which seemed beside the point enough to post. I was mistaken, I'm think.
I blame Umberto eco.