Seal Culling
- Started
- Last post
- 226 Responses
- ********0
not at all brandelec
but with comments like this"i just wanted to get you guys to care about other animals"
fuck OFF.
you don't know nothing about me.
the only thing you can is to derail a thread meant to take action against a bad situation.
vormburo
(Mar 30 05, 14:20)when you actually encoutner a debate about other animals coming in to play, is this what would someone say?
or will this person be called a hippy psycho
some people are very passionate about things but if they are not willing to listen or take other's comments, than they are not treated seriously
- jevad0
HEY EVERYBODY!
calm down
- brandelec0
i think that's why you got under people's skin, because if this was a 'save the animals' thread then by all means educate us about the animals, the current topic however is on seals.
one animal at a time ;)
- spiralstarez0
funny thing is harold I actually agree with your opinion about other animals as regarding my Dennis Leary post, and of chickens.
But cluttering useless two word responses that say nothing one right after the other is not much of a contribution.
- vburo0
what brandelec says.
apparently you just don't get what i says with the one braincell in the empty head of yours.
this thread was intended to discuss this subject.. not to be derailed.
let it die now. or remove it.
- lowimpakt0
if a baby seal is clubbed on the head and no greenpeace activist is there to see, does it bleed?
- ********0
How about some consistency?
mrdobolina
(Mar 30 05, 14:21)
+++++++++++++++++++
sorry. i was too busy derailing the other one with my hairy body story.you were saying?
- mrdobolina0
haha, you fucker.
- lowimpakt0
would greenpeace mind if polar bears were doing the killing?
- jevad0
would greenpeace mind if polar bears were doing the killing?
lowimpakt
(Mar 30 05, 14:46)That is a fucking stupid question
- ********0
killer whales kill thousands of seals, in a nasty way too
- vburo0
*sigh
- ********0
"apparently you just don't get what i says with the one braincell in the empty head of yours."
accompanied by FUCK OFF
makes a great arugement
also mind you this is a public forumn, if you want a private debate, make a private thread it discuss it there.
NT is for the masses not for your own motivational reasons or consumption.
- lowimpakt0
That is a fucking stupid question
jevad
(Mar 30 05, 14:47)
----------------------------em. ok. as seen as this thread was derailed I thought i'd start with the environmental ethics questions. It is actually central to differing perceptions of man and nature and the interations therein.
- vburo0
whatever harold. you win. i am out.
- ********0
would greenpeace mind if polar bears were doing the killing?
lowimpakt
(Mar 30 05, 14:46)now thats a non sense comment
- ********0
vormburo
no i dont win nor you win.
- ********0
maybe off topic here but people who protest in the streets generally piss me off. when the G8 summit was here a couple years ago they had the conference in the kananaskis country (an hour outside of calgary in the rocky mountains) to avoid protesters etc (it was insanely guarded and there was only one road in to the site) people protested downtown here for a while but weren't satisfied with the world leaders not being able to hear them so they DROVE out to kananaskis for an hour in their SUV's and cars etc, to protest! how hypocritical. if you are going to protest do it intelligently like writing letters, making websites (as janne did) or something more productive than running around the streets yelling "starbucks sucks"
/end rant
- lowimpakt0
now thats a non sense comment
_harold
(Mar 30 05, 14:50)
-------------------------------being fickle because this thread is well derailed and yea i may be a little searching but i'm interested in the obsession of the spectacle and the ethical foundations of peoples opinions in relation to nature/environment issues. And all that stuff about whether man should control nature or if they are obliged to because ecological balances have been tipped so far off kilter already etc etc
and basically about perceptions of mans position within/without nature and the types of events that brings their opinions to focus. I remember reading a paper a few years back about the "disaster catalyst" and how only large scale events (like mass culls, global warming etc) can make most people sit up to an issue. and so the original question was to understand the scenario if the cull didn't take place. what would the rebound effect be on the eco-system etc etc yawn
- ********0
well said lowimpakt
i was making a point about ethics and human consumption.
but your point about eco balance is relatively good