I SUPPORT THE TROOPS.
- Started
- Last post
- 121 Responses
- ********0
watch BBC.
- unknown0
Pentagon: Iraqis Set Oil Wells on Fire
- subSTANCE0
4cY... i am not gonna sit here and say that i have all the answers for you... just opinions... jeeez... i hope you don't think YOU have them...
but you can look at things like...
they are NOT ALLOWED to have the weapons they are firing now... they have lied about them years ago... they have OBVIOUSLY lied about having recently... and if they went to all the trouble to lie about these smaller less harmful weapons... who is to say that greater lengths have not been taken to secure more powerful ones.......
- ahmed0
setting oil wells on fire: what the hell did you expect? these people would leave their gold vulnerable?
attacking kuwait: well, thats just a reflex action from the u.s. attacking iraq. so i blame the u.s. for that, not iiraq. if bush hadn't fucking attracked, hissein would still be in his palace masturbating and not killing innocent kuwaitis!
- mrdobolina0
isnt the BBC owned by the british government?
- ahmed0
it was nice to hear that only 25% of brits support this war
and then again, almost 70% of americans support it....they also think saddam was responsible for 9/11
damn media!
- mitsu0
"they also think saddam was responsible for 9/11"
not true, but ok...
- ahmed0
not true? lemme go and find the link for the news story then...
- mrdobolina0
yeah ahmed, I remember when everyone in my city was interviewed for the link you are about to supply. Dont believe everything you read, playboy.
- mitsu0
save yourself the trouble..
what source could possibly account for the collective voice of america?
and please don't show me a f**king AOL poll result.
- unknown0
they do think he is responsible
also i have a new theory.....
Saddam knows hes in the crapper no matter what and will use his WOMD bio crap
check this out
- unknown0
the burning of the oil fields accomplishes two things
1. provides cover for the Iraqi army so that the US and it's high tech surveilence via sattelites becomes hampered.
The US won't be able to rely on satelitre guided missiles and will have to fight with ground troops in close combat, ala vietnam- casualties on both sides will be tremendous.2. destroying the prize that the us is so eager to get it's hands on.
- ahmed0
lol, no it wasnt an aol poll. it was a boston herald news article
ah well, its not like it matters. it's already begun
:/
- mitsu0
"they do think he is responsible"
they includes me, and i do not believe this.
your gross generalization just hurts your credibility and weakens your arguments. now i'm starting to know who to and who not to listen to.
- ahmed0
"destroying the prize that the us is so eager to get it's hands on."
exactly
- mitsu0
"lol, no it wasnt an aol poll. it was a boston herald news article"
sorry, i made another point that allowed you to sidestep the real issue:
no source can account for every voice in America...
- ahmed0
true
but since you're one of the ppl that belive hussein is linked to 9/11, please share your wonderful information on how so
- mitsu0
"they includes me, and i do not believe this."
let me repeat:
they includes me, and i do NOT believe this.
i don't think there are links....
- unknown0
Aside from alterior motives of US govt... could Saddam not be compared with Hitler - prior to Pearl Harbour, US kept it's nose out of the european war for 2 years while millions died in the fight against fascism. If US had intervened sooner, many lives might have been spared....
- ahmed0
well fuck me. i guess i didn't read the not
and surely im not the only one who's seen this story?