sigma Art Series Lenses
sigma Art Series Lenses
Out of context: Reply #7
- Started
- Last post
- 9 Responses
- garbage1
I was curious about getting one for the Fuji, but they kind of seem like gimmic lenses that are better suited for dicking around and would be a liability in professional settings.
- I was talking to a mate the other day and he said some of his friends had swapped out Canon lenses for Sigma ones on their shoots.PhanLo
- I like the idea of a 1.4 and being able to get photos in low light. The Panasonic equivalent is nearly 3 times the price.
Will post some photos when it arrives.PhanLo - Updates please!garbage
- Will do! i think for me it will be a step up no matter what as I've only recently got a decent camera, but for a professional, it might be a drop in quality.PhanLo
- they are great lenses. better in some cases. I rock canon and i find the 24-105 better canon version. the 70-200 is such a small difference vs canondeathboy
- on the II vs sigma. at half cost. so worth it. Find a canon on wide zoom is still better with a the 16-35 f4. Never used the III 2.8 vs.deathboy
- also have the sigam 50 1.4 double price fo canon 1.4. Worth every penny. Havent used the 1.2 canon but so very happy im not sure i care too.deathboy
- You should post some photos Deathboy.PhanLo
- i have in the past. still have a bunch of salkantay trek stuff to go through just haven't had the time. busy designing real world stuff like mudroomsdeathboy
- backyards, bookshelves, office shit between work. and im pretty sure i lean towards over engineering everythingdeathboy
- eh excuse sucks... some i went through for a guy at the park who never got to see the mountains when he hiked it 20 years ago https://imgur.com/a/…deathboy