Public Voice Network
- What are you listening to… 55775577
- Trailer Of The Day 794794
- Flickr Redesign 2424
- Ray Manzarek, RIP : / 1515
- Car of The Day 807807
- Name this design style 2828
- Yahoo buying Tumblr 1212
- Apple Manufacturing 22
- Bitcoin 114114
- Pic of the Day 7468974689
- FMT170513 1212
- the gif animation thread 1844118441
- e-cigarettes 3535
- Tornado season 101101
- Great motorcycles 243243
- Pic of the day - DESIGN 10341034
- Amy's Baking Company 106106
- Studio VS Agency VS Consu… 1414
- Vid of the Day 1504715047
- Angelina Joile boobs.. 3333
- Denver Area Web Designer… 77
- blog 5769857698
- Front-End Dev Los Angeles
- A good Booking Calendar f…
IPR quandry 8383 Responses
Last post: 1 year, 8 months ago | Thread started: Sep 5, 11, 7:35 p.m.
- mydo
The topic is more than just "would you". it's about where you stand on IPR. I know we are being the internet protagonists, but do you really take yourself so seriously?
Even if you had a licence for every font you owned, how about a font that is based on another. Do you delete these from your system? Would you leave a restaurant if you believed their lampshades to not be licensed? I know for a fact the cut of your clothes was stolen from another. Why should such a strong view apply to one thing and not another. Because copyright taken to the Nth degree would be crippling, it's just not practical now.To sell something as an original is fraud.. To pretend you have talent like Mr b@ash is a different matter altogether.
I've spent the last 7 years living in a culture where everything is copied. I don't just mean sticking an apple logo on a calculator and calling it an iphone. but entire BMW's and water. There are a 1000 rip offs but only one original, this doesn't weaken the brand value of the original, it strengthens it. This is the difference between copy and fake, and this isn't a divide many people make.
There is too much weight on ownership. The world has changed. Why should a design for a single piece of plastic be protected forever? Why shouldn't you have the right to buy any shape bit of plastic you like?


- Dog-earSep 6, 11, 9:57 p.m. – Permalink
- pr2
There are "chairs" - the first image that pops up in your head when you think chair. And there are objects of art that also are used to sit on thus can also be called chairs. If you are trying to get a piece of furniture to sit on then fine, get what you want. But if you are trying to be cool cause you have such awesome "objet d'art" in your office and think that you can get away with $50 replica - then you are a cunt and a hack.
mydo seems to be from China - where creativity has no value and bottom line is the king thus it's hard for him/her to even comprehend that someone would want the real thing.


- Dog-earSep 6, 11, 10:01 p.m. – Permalink
- typist
@mydo
it's nothing personal or i am against you but here we go:
do you have the license to use the shanghai expo character used in your company cny ecard? i bet you don't
here is another example that you don't respect originality
you did this
http://www.mydot.co.uk/2010/ligh…original design by droog design
it doesn't matter where you live, you are a creative director, i believe you know what is the value of design
peace


- Dog-earSep 6, 11, 10:12 p.m. – Permalink
- mydo
Interestingly what gave me the inspiration for the cheese graters was a lamp similar to Rody Graumans that i saw in London in the early 90's. Maybe that's where he got the inspiration. That and a recent Conran table lamp!
would this design be a copy in your view?


- Dog-earSep 6, 11, 10:32 p.m. – Permalink
- mydo
@typist
This seems to be an entirely different debate, but while i'm here...Are you making the assumption that any designer that produces something that takes inspiration from something else has no respect for originality?
Would that go as far as JSK's standpoint that you are guilty if you were to purchase that design too?
A good example of design inspiring design is fashion. This methodology is core to the industry, are you denouncing them too?


- Dog-earSep 6, 11, 11:12 p.m. – Permalink
- mydo
I used to know your real name, and website, but i've forgotten. Maybe it's better to be anonymous here. If there was ever a Shanghai QBN drinks it's not got off to a good start!
It's personal because you called me out for not respecting originality, when i pushed for your definition you just returned to my job title.
I concede. I should not have bought a $50 copy. but i did, and I won't judge you if you have an unlicensed copy of powerpoint. It seems there is a line that we are all happy to move when it suits us. if you're not 100% on one side, you don't have the right to a moral high ground.

- Dog-earSep 7, 11, 12:47 a.m. – Permalink
- typist
100%??? are we going to the extreme?
so for once if i was wrong, i can't do anything right after that?i am sorry to assume you don't have the respect for droog design
you just like the idea and you DIY your own versiondo you have any explianation for the shanghai expo character that you illegally used for your company?


- Dog-earSep 7, 11, 1:13 a.m. – Permalink







