Dawkins @ TED
- Started
- Last post
- 97 Responses
- Mimio0
No FrdmOfSpech that's when he called himself "Discipler", not he's an armchair "creation scientist".
You gotta love a guy that talks about "miracles" and the improbability(or probability) of genetic drift being non-deleterious in one breath.
You have no place to stand but we love you.
- Nairn0
If He's sloppy and inconsistent, show me where.
flagellum
(May 2 07, 07:11)Good lord, man - by the very fact that more people in this world believe in gods other than him? That, in his own countries, his best and brightest seemingly don't believe in him? That he only reveals himself to Portuguese peasants, or illiterate shepards in bronze/dark ages and hasn't, outside occasional appearances on toast and in wet-rot marks, revealed ANY overwhelming evidence of his existence during the recent hundred year span of history where his impact might have some viable worth?
This kind of touches on the whole due-diligence argument - why should the onus be one me to discredit all your spurious suppositions, inferences and acceptances?
Whatever, we all know this, as always, isn't going anywhere, nor can it do.
- Mimio0
//Nairn God is hiding and watching until the proper time.
- non0
Can't understand why someone can still "believe" in a superior being when they are totally aware that FACTS contradict every belief they have.
- kelpie0
= definition of "faith"
- FrdmOfSpch0
and adam's children
brothers and sisters,
fucked each other until the entire earth became populated.
and THEN incest was banned.
- flagellum0
Nairn: Virtually everything you've mentioned is the result of mankind's sin (since we are now talking theology). The Bible teaches that things are not as they were created. Further, God indeed has revealed himself to a multitude of brilliant people. Do you require a list of some of them? I'm happy to list them. They include scientists of all stripes. And God has revealed himself in the design of nature, not toast. Just examine the specified information (you might call it a programming code) in DNA. Or the machinery in the average cell. Or the process of photosynthesis. PHd's in Engineering and biochemistry marvel at such designs. Evidently you didn't get the memo about those though. There is also mind-brain conundrum and how/why we have a conscious and experience first person perspective, beauty, grief, etc... C'mon, open your eyes.
- flagellum0
conscious = consciousness.
- mrdobolina0
man invented the microchip, what is your point? Would it make sense to a fucking troglodyte? Nope.
sinner.
- Mimio0
Has he said "Shrill cry of a designer" yet?
- flagellum0
sharp as a bowling ball as always, mrdobs.
- FrdmOfSpch0
and the lions ate hay?
- flagellum0
hehe, you can make all the personal jabs and jokes about legitimate terminology as you want, but none of that changes that evidence. ...which again is what i'm interested in.
- FrdmOfSpch0
your evidence that miracles were involved?
- lvl_130
oh weird, flagellum is in this thread.
PLEASE USE THIS BOARD IN OTHER NON GOD DISCUSSING ISSUES FOR FUCKS SAKE!
seriously. why would you only particpate in threads relating to religious (or whatever you want to call them) matters?? why?
it's annoying. never mind actually. *ignore
- flagellum0
the evidence that there was intelligence involved in producing life.
- FrdmOfSpch0
but things where the evidence goes against your beliefs, miracles were involved?
i.e evidence showing lions can't digest hay... :D
- flagellum0
Where does the evidence go against my beliefs?
And what are my beliefs, btw?