5G
- Started
- Last post
- 89 Responses
- set-7
- set-7
- kingsteven5
- Quelle surprise. The links between the tories and HSBC & the BBC are just as insidious.Wolfboy
- kingsteven3
Don't know about the health risks but if it's even a possibility that it's going to block weather satellites (Water vapour in the atmosphere is detected at 23.8GHz) it seems daft to proceed with the rollout...
- lol that's the last thing to worry aboutset
- of course... but it's incredible that they want to force it through considering the effects on an existing technology, let alone biological concerns.kingsteven
- Agreed. It's sinister as fuck.set
- Fax_Benson3
I don't have a clue about the science behind it.
There's a petition if you want the govmnt (UK) to have to conduct an independent report
- * I guess it should be conduct an inquiry and then produce a report, rather than conduct a report.Fax_Benson
- helloeatbreathedrive7
We all gonna die set, let us enjoy our 5G :)
.
jk mate :)
- set-2
- set
What are peoples thoughts here on 5G? It's pretty scary stuff. Switzerland has banned the development of any more towers and Celine Fremault the environmental minister of Brussels has halted the project because of the health risks and said that 'the people of Brussels are not guinea pigs whose health I can sell at a profit'.
Even with its great distance, 4G has negative health effects. With each change in the distance of 5G getting closer to us, the exposure to the frequencies is squared, 4x, 9x, 16x, 25x, 36x, 49x, etc. Thus the distance can actually be a bigger health risk* than the frequency. With cell masts being placed 800 feet apart, that makes 5G far worse than 4G which is already affecting people's health.
We have no clue as to how bad a full constellation of 5G will be. Simple tests from one source for short durations have revealed results incompatible with normal health and life. Real world 5G will be multiple sources and for longer duration.
Plus 4G beats us 2.4 to 5 billion times a second. 5G beats us 25 billion pulses a second or higher. All our tissues have frequencies. Our skin is like a symphony orchestra, and 5G is like a tube band walking onto the stage and interrupting mid performance. Our skin can't like it having its frequencies thumped 25 billion times a second.
*"risk" is not the proper term because it implies a chance of avoiding the harm. There is no avoiding the harm with 5G. The danger is guaranteed. No one is exempt because all of us depend on our Voltage Gated Cell Electrolyte Channels in order to stay alive. 5G interferes with those channels.
Scary, scary shit.