GUNS and the Hollocaust

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 22 Responses
  • autoflavour

    im so glad this guy is currently the second option behind trump.. because you know, crazy is entertaining.. but seriously..

    http://www.theguardian.com/us-ne…

  • monospaced0

    Presidential candidates thread?

    • the stupid transcends that thread..autoflavour
    • bold call i know, but sometimes you need to take reality by the balls and just squeezeautoflavour
    • wordmonospaced
    • "guns" gilgamush shoots hit load in threadutopian
  • GeorgesII1

    well, he's not wrong...

    think about it for a second before going antigun on me,
    a sec,

    if the american native had guns, they would have been no mass murder,
    if the french royalty had guns, they would have been no revolution,
    if the egyptian slave had guns, they would be no pyramids,

    you guys are so anti gun, it makes my head hurt!

    • If Steve Jobs had guns there would be no iOS 9isleptwithsirenstonight
    • if the egyptians had guns, i would be amazed at how a bronze age civilization had mastered firearmsautoflavour
    • the rational that if they had guns it wouldnt have happened is ludicrous. it still would have happened, just with a lot more street gun battlesautoflavour
    • wow, wow, slow down there, please take your logic to the door,
      we're here for emotions and guns!
      GeorgesII
    • lolmoldero
    • Black Man Logic™2002
    • hahahaha this post.nb
    • no need to engage this guys. its stupid on its own. this thread will collapse under its own stupidity.yurimon
    • if only guns had gunskingsteven
    • I think what autoflavor is saying is that Jews are not good with anything that involves hand skills. So even with guns, they'd still suffer a holocaust.KaitlinMcCarthy
    • .. or at least suffer from poorly kept prison camps leading to death and sickness of many various people and hoax a genocide.KaitlinMcCarthy
  • Continuity0

    Fuck me, his flavour of stupid is particularly rancid.

    • thread worth rancid.. not run of the mill stupidautoflavour
    • well, 6 millions armed jews could have prevented the hollocost!GeorgesII
    • not if the were all shot in the process..autoflavour
    • can't get shot, if you have guns,
      your logic is full of holes!!
      GeorgesII
    • full of holes.. like those after being shot in a shoot outautoflavour
  • GeorgesII-1

    ok, let me BE clear,

    I think guns are a total necessity, just two days ago some guy was caught shoplifting and only a small lady with a gun saved the situation.

    yesterday, some fine marksman aged 5yo, fed some lead to his starving 2yo sister,

    you guys are foolish to believe all these events would not have happened if it wasn't for guns,

    now can we have a solid discussion on the matter or we're going to circlejerk for another day about the benefit of small calibers?

  • GeorgesII0

    Dear Auto,

    I don't want to be THAT guy,
    but I know you have children,

    In between us, I believe a small 45 could easily fit in their lunchbag,
    or you prefer to leave them unprotected,

    wOUld you think of the children...

    Starting tomorrow, I'll pack a small Uzi next to my kid's babybel!

  • GeorgesII1

    ok, I may have gone a little overboard on my comment above,
    but you have to hear me out,

    AABM, I believe in the bible and it is written in chapter 10 paragraph 3:

    Give a man a gun and he will shoot for a day,
    but give him access to unlimited guns and ammo and he may shoot for life.

    so sorry for bringing your family into this, but what is happening now is written in the scripture

  • autoflavour-4

    this thread needs more yurimon .. its not getting enough crazy for my liking

    • Careful, son ... cos along with more yurimon comes more gilgamesh.Continuity
    • And a sprinkle of Hayothisleptwithsirenstonight
    • whats the deal with gilgamesh.. i never really noticed him before but he is the new firebrand of crazy around hereautoflavour
    • or is he just a second account for a usual nutter?autoflavour
    • maybe, deep down, we're all a little yurimon inside :(GeorgesII
    • Dunno. Reminds me a little bit of VikingKingEleven, with a bit less white-powerness.Continuity
    • are you saying you want yurimon deep down inside you?autoflavour
    • ... popfodders, cnaps, jazx, freeeed
      Their memory lives on
      isleptwithsirenstonight
    • autoflavor, maybe you are the cunt in the equation?yurimon
    • im more of a giver than a taker..autoflavour
    • but so glad you could stop byautoflavour
    • this thread is too stupid for me to even get into. have fun boys, i'm outta heregilgamush
    • yes, Carson's logic is extremely stupid, on that we agree gilgamushmonospaced
  • GeorgesII1

    yurimon is gone, but I'm here now

  • autoflavour3

    i know i posted this in the POTD.. but it feels like it needs a repost

    • god invented guns, it's in the genesis part,GeorgesII
  • nb0

    If Adam & Eve had guns, they could've stayed in the Garden of Eden.

    • If Satan had a gun he could have killed God before being banished.monospaced
  • isleptwithsirenstonight0

    fuckoff, I like guns!!

    • you like cockautoflavour
    • Have you ever sucked cock? Well don't say it isn't for you unless you have tried it and weren't happy.isleptwithsirenstonight
    • hes waiting for the 100th prim8 to pick up the habit.yurimon
    • islept kid, i can't be having little impostors running around parroting me line for line. i am flattered but not downgilgamush
    • I'm sorry that you are oppressed in your emotions the paranoia that governs your life is a reflection of your fear.isleptwithsirenstonight
    • blah blah, shut up already. don't parrot me word for word without a citation. i have a thread for that now thanks to you, my biggest fangilgamush
    • OK, I'm sending them back.
      "Have you ever sucked cock? Well don't say it isn't for you unless you have tried it and weren't happy."
      isleptwithsirenstonight
    • Can you send "cock" back? It wasn't in your original text. #notword4wordisleptwithsirenstonight
  • KaitlinMcCarthy0

    Jews are not good with anything that involves hand skills anyway. So even with guns, they'd still suffer a holocaust.

    • oh gee kaitlin, any more classy things to addgilgamush
    • at least I think that's what auto flavor was trying to suggest.KaitlinMcCarthy
    • the only posts you have made on this site have been about your stance on jews since 2 months ago when you joined. we get it, you hate jewsgilgamush
    • I am Jewish.KaitlinMcCarthy
    • yes yes, so you said the last time you talked about how much you despise jews. you are also completely full of shit and have no knowledge of historygilgamush
    • where do you get your history from? Either it was from my Jewish history books, or a movie we produced for you to watch.KaitlinMcCarthy
    • and BTW, I do not despise Jews. We're the fuckin' choose ones. We own shit!KaitlinMcCarthy
    • peace out nazi bitch, i have better things to do than be trolled on by someone with the mind of a childgilgamush
    • Dude, calm down! I'm just joking with you. I am Jewish, but you think like I'm supposed to act a certain way and agree with your version of my history?KaitlinMcCarthy
  • youngdesigner0

    OMG outrage alert

    He didn't say guns would have stopped the Holocaust, just that it would have been harder for Hitler to move people into death camps if they were armed.

    Imagine every North Korean had a gun, would it still be the same country?

    • If the Jews did have guns, wouldn't have been a little easier? It'd skip the entire process of transportation and housing.KaitlinMcCarthy
    • no, because they were death camps disguised as concentration camps. hitler didn't want the world to know he was purposelessly murdering large amounts of peoplegilgamush
    • Most Germans were not aware what was really happening in the camps, so they wanted to keep it secret. Armed conflict would have created problems.youngdesigner
    • gilgamush just made that shit up, or saw that shit in a movie. Show us some documentation that Hitler ordered any death camp to disguise as a concentration campKaitlinMcCarthy
    • ooooor you could research it your fucking self. i would think you would be better informed on matters concerning your heritage. oh that's right you are utopiangilgamush
    • or some other like minded person on here that spews hateful shit and calls it humor. fuck off trollgilgamush
    • You're mad cause I caught your and getting all your information from watching Schindler's List which you probably thought was non-fiction.KaitlinMcCarthy
    • I adore that you're a history buff kinda. But those movies are just stories we grow up on to tell our kids. We're story tellers, not gun slingers.KaitlinMcCarthy
    • mccarthy, yea, so you are an irish jew huh. no wonder you are so confusedgilgamush
    • gilgamush, that was a very racist thing to say about me.KaitlinMcCarthy
    • that's nice, have fun playing make believegilgamush
    • Why are you calling this user a Jew?monospaced
    • Read the comments in the previous postgilgamush
  • BusterBoy0

    The level of stupidity is astounding...just when you thought there may have been a candidate with some level of intelligence. There all fucken paranoid...as though guns rule their lives. Very sad.

  • utopian1

    gilgamush will troll and own this thread, that's how he do!

  • isleptwithsirenstonight1


    http://www.qbn.com/reply/3754047…
    Then proceeds to babble on in the sidenotes for the rest of the thread

  • caterpus0

    I love historical fiction.

  • lowimpakt1

    I like how he thinks the might of the US military which is the largest and most heavily funded in the world is being kept in check by a bunch of citizens with 9mm handguns.

    Remember, this is how much the US taxpayer funds their military.

    • how much is spent local vs around the world?... the US is everywhere / yet not spread too thin I'd thinkPonyBoy
    • Murikkka!utopian
  • PonyBoy4

    I keep seeing people writing about the US citizenry 'keeping their military in check' as being impossible (low, you're the latest to mention this—not personally calling you out, dude)...

    ... how many US citizens on this site are friendly / close / family with either military or cops?

    Every last cop or military person I know would take sides w/their fellow citizen in a heartbeat if this country found itself at odds w/itself... I don't know one that would gear-up and fight their neighbor... even w/the shit my cop 'pals' are putting up w/now w/everyone going apeshit and filming their every last move— they'd still stand by their neighbor before taking up arms against them...

    ... maybe I know mere flukes and shills? :)

    Regardless... our 'government' has pricks in it... whose doesn't? That government still relies on us little folks to protect them. That 'little folk' has family / friends / comrades-at-arms (if-you-will) that will be exceptionally disobedient the first off-color order they're given (ie: kill your neighbor cuz a bureaucrat told you to). This is an issue the US gov has been concerned about with for years... how to take care of the 1% when law enforcement and military turn on you because they were actually never with you.

    • I'm close friends with several NYC cops spanning generations.monospaced
    • I only put it out there for the debate. If army would side with citizens the argument that guns are needed to keep gov in check is void.lowimpakt
    • most army / ex army (same w/police) I know have been geared-up for years... they have a ton of the current armory themselves...PonyBoy
    • I agree. Many cops and military j know would consider themselves, and side with, citizens if the government decided to engage or some shit.monospaced
    • ... and given they are the citizens as much as you and I... you're talking about them disarming them too (minus their service weapons if they're curr. serving)PonyBoy
    • I'm talking about them not turning on their own.monospaced
    • I think in some cases or most they would disarm people if given the order. not all of them are smart in respect to morality and following orders type stuff.yurimon
    • mono.. my second comment got cut in half (by yours)... we're in agreement here :)PonyBoy
    • Yeah, I gathered :) yurimon, I'm sure. At first we'd see plenty, but there would be a line drawn at some point.monospaced
    • Uhh, ok have your cop/military buddy take arms with you. What's that going to do against a drone 1,000 ft in the sky? Or a jet?iCanHazQBN
    • Are you going to shoot a tank with your handgun and hope it stops??iCanHazQBN
    • If you're buddy leaves the military to join you, he just becomes another civilian with a handgun.iCanHazQBN
    • He doesn't get to take a drone with him as a parting-gift when he leaves the military.iCanHazQBN
    • You would all get blasted from a missile from 3,000 ft. high and you would never see it coming.iCanHazQBN
    • If you want to keep pretending it's 1776, and your militias have any power, and both sides are fighting with muskets... that's up to you.iCanHazQBN
    • pilots and drones need human input. basically if you look at this type of scenario you are looking at 50/50 split in forces opposed and blind order followersyurimon
    • this goes all the way up the chain. they did clean house a bit on upper levels to put favorable peeps in. after a survey of 75% said no if going against peeplyurimon
    • I think you'd be surprised. Look at what we did to Japanese Americans decades ago. That's soldiers taking orders.iCanHazQBN
    • And how can you at the same time say things like 'fear the govt', and give all these examples of dictators and their armies killing their own people..iCanHazQBN
    • ..and using that to justify guns. But at the same time in this post say 'oh but the military will be on our side'.iCanHazQBN
    • Seems like you can't even decide which excuse you want to use.iCanHazQBN
    • either handing us over to the enemies armies or you have to dumb down the culture a bit. everything is necromancy right now for a reason.yurimon
    • self destruction culture. cultural marxism, political correctness. its doesnt happen overnight. wwII germany was a 100 year plan.yurimon
    • you need to give things over to the proletariat, reverse control. or to social underdogs. its going on economically, culturally.yurimon
    • and with every ones help.yurimon
    • regards to your response. you are very simple minded. history is progression to turning points in time. french revolution is a good example.yurimon
    • if you look at the trend even from current history it pretty clear to project from everything even going on in our present, where things are desired to be takenyurimon
    • you make a valid point, iCanHaz... there's shit out there technology-wise that we can't defeat—so let me ask this— do you just want to roll over and die? :)PonyBoy
    • and mind you... I'm not saying anything is going to happen... but if it does go down— you're not interested in protecting yourself? Seems like you've already...PonyBoy
    • ... decided that there is no chance... just just roll over and die then, yes? :)PonyBoy
    • At this very moment we are already disarmed. We've already 'rolled over' by funding the military with an endless stream of taxpayers money.iCanHazQBN
    • We are completely vulnerable, even with our guns.iCanHazQBN
    • If we want any fighting chance, we have to drastically scale down the size and strength of the military http://www.washingto…iCanHazQBN
    • And these pro-gun right-wingers are against defunding the military – which is a completely backwards response to what they're trying to stand up for.iCanHazQBN
    • It's mind-boggling. They talk about having guns to protect themselves from the military... yet they'll fund the military endlessly. Digging their own graves.iCanHazQBN
    • (The broken link is the chart from the post above comparing US vs other countries' spending).iCanHazQBN
    • again... you have a point :) I've heard diehard libertarians say much of what you just said— they say it because they think we should be allowed to...PonyBoy
    • ... arm ourselves JUST AS the military (whatever weaponry they have should be available to the public). They feel according to the 2nd amendment that if...PonyBoy
    • ... it's good enough for the army it's should be fine in the hands of the private citizen (which would be fine if it was merely swords and muskets)PonyBoy
    • *sigh
      we're fucked
      ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
      PonyBoy
  • GeorgesII6

    • at least learn some history peoeple!GeorgesII
    • one aspect you are forgetting that people followed orders. it wasnt this autonomous robot it was people who followed orders. numb nutsyurimon
    • not to mention the majority of the time the jews were told they were being taken to a better place out of the ghettos.. guns wouldn't have don't anything thereautoflavour
    • so.... holocaust was gonna happen regardless of gun control.
      then this argument is just as pointless as colour book for blind people.
      pango
    • holy shit i can't believe you guys are even engaging georges' sarcastic troll post. i don't mean you auto.pango