Artificial Intelligence
- Started
- Last post
- 2,570 Responses
- ********-5
"The Pentagon threatened to either cut ties and declare Anthropic a "supply chain risk," or invoke the Defense Production Act to force the company to tailor its model to the military's needs."
- "Freedom of speech is the right to express opinions and ideas without fear of government retaliation or censorship. "********
- The US is not a serious country anymore :))********
- old news dude, old newsYakuZoku
- "Freedom of speech is the right to express opinions and ideas without fear of government retaliation or censorship. "
- ********-9
- People still don't get how AI works ffsake********
- "AI agent on OpenClaw goes rogue deleting messages from Meta engineer's Gmail, later says sorry"********
- She said she RUN to her Mac Mini to stop the agent from deleting her gmail :)))))))
Dumb fucks there is no AI********
- People still don't get how AI works ffsake
- mg337
First off, I'm not getting in the middle of whatever squabbles some of you have with grafician, but good grief... the concerted effort to downvote anything he posts - several posts of which I see posted here, is ridiculous. He has literally posted links here that had anyone else posted, they'd be upvoted. Everything he's posted here is relevant to AI, and is mostly free from literally any perspective of his own that some of you are always hellbent on tearing apart. Some of his posts are just links, or quotes... and all downvoted.
So can some of you just like... chill?
-----
Utopian, that 60 Minutes segment is really something. The video art that guy is making... seeing that in person would be incredible.I think that was a well justified and rewarding use of AI. It's something that with a non-AI approach could probably be created, but would take so much longer. I can't even imagine. That's where it's fun to see AI pushed to the limit to bring to life some outrageous vision that feels brand new.
I like that the one woman talked about the ethics of AI theft, image training, etc. It feels so long ago already that it was fun for a while to use Midjourney, etc. and say "make something in this style" but I'm glad I tired of it quickly. The novelty wore off fast.
- We're just having fun, I don't think anyone cares about votesYakuZoku
- Votes rhymes with goats btw.YakuZoku
- I highly doubt the downvotes are for the post itself.monospaced
- There is no AI dumb fuckmonospaced
- Thanks I'm good, the idiots will are no winning********
- PhanLo0
- ba0054a
- sorry the URL messed upPhanLo
- Weird vimeo link https://vimeo.com/11…PhanLo
- Vimeo fucked themsleves.
What a nonsensePhanLo
- utopian0
AIs can’t stop recommending nuclear strikes in war game simulations
- dbloc3
Statement from Dario Amodei on our discussions with the Department of War
Feb 26, 2026I believe deeply in the existential importance of using AI to defend the United States and other democracies, and to defeat our autocratic adversaries.
Anthropic has therefore worked proactively to deploy our models to the Department of War and the intelligence community. We were the first frontier AI company to deploy our models in the US government’s classified networks, the first to deploy them at the National Laboratories, and the first to provide custom models for national security customers. Claude is extensively deployed across the Department of War and other national security agencies for mission-critical applications, such as intelligence analysis, modeling and simulation, operational planning, cyber operations, and more.
Anthropic has also acted to defend America’s lead in AI, even when it is against the company’s short-term interest. We chose to forgo several hundred million dollars in revenue to cut off the use of Claude by firms linked to the Chinese Communist Party (some of whom have been designated by the Department of War as Chinese Military Companies), shut down CCP-sponsored cyberattacks that attempted to abuse Claude, and have advocated for strong export controls on chips to ensure a democratic advantage.
Anthropic understands that the Department of War, not private companies, makes military decisions. We have never raised objections to particular military operations nor attempted to limit use of our technology in an ad hoc manner.
However, in a narrow set of cases, we believe AI can undermine, rather than defend, democratic values. Some uses are also simply outside the bounds of what today’s technology can safely and reliably do. Two such use cases have never been included in our contracts with the Department of War, and we believe they should not be included now:
• Mass domestic surveillance. We support the use of AI for lawful foreign intelligence and counterintelligence missions. But using these systems for mass domestic surveillance is incompatible with democratic values. AI-driven mass surveillance presents serious, novel risks to our fundamental liberties. To the extent that such surveillance is currently legal, this is only because the law has not yet caught up with the rapidly growing capabilities of AI. For example, under current law, the government can purchase detailed records of Americans’ movements, web browsing, and associations from public sources without obtaining a warrant, a practice the Intelligence Community has acknowledged raises privacy concerns and that has generated bipartisan opposition in Congress. Powerful AI makes it possible to assemble this scattered, individually innocuous data into a comprehensive picture of any person’s life—automatically and at massive scale.
• Fully autonomous weapons. Partially autonomous weapons, like those used today in Ukraine, are vital to the defense of democracy. Even fully autonomous weapons (those that take humans out of the loop entirely and automate selecting and engaging targets) may prove critical for our national defense. But today, frontier AI systems are simply not reliable enough to power fully autonomous weapons. We will not knowingly provide a product that puts America’s warfighters and civilians at risk. We have offered to work directly with the Department of War on R&D to improve the reliability of these systems, but they have not accepted this offer. In addition, without proper oversight, fully autonomous weapons cannot be relied upon to exercise the critical judgment that our highly trained, professional troops exhibit every day. They need to be deployed with proper guardrails, which don’t exist today.
To our knowledge, these two exceptions have not been a barrier to accelerating the adoption and use of our models within our armed forces to date.
The Department of War has stated they will only contract with AI companies who accede to “any lawful use” and remove safeguards in the cases mentioned above. They have threatened to remove us from their systems if we maintain these safeguards; they have also threatened to designate us a “supply chain risk”—a label reserved for US adversaries, never before applied to an American company—and to invoke the Defense Production Act to force the safeguards’ removal. These latter two threats are inherently contradictory: one labels us a security risk; the other labels Claude as essential to national security.
Regardless, these threats do not change our position: we cannot in good conscience accede to their request.
It is the Department’s prerogative to select contractors most aligned with their vision. But given the substantial value that Anthropic’s technology provides to our armed forces, we hope they reconsider. Our strong preference is to continue to serve the Department and our warfighters—with our two requested safeguards in place. Should the Department choose to offboard Anthropic, we will work to enable a smooth transition to another provider, avoiding any disruption to ongoing military planning, operations, or other critical missions. Our models will be available on the expansive terms we have proposed for as long as required.
We remain ready to continue our work to support the national security of the United States.
- yuekit2
Pentagon declares Anthropic a threat to national security
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth declared Anthropic a “supply-chain risk,” blocking all federal agencies and contractors from doing business with the company
- https://archive.is/6…yuekit
- so much respect for Anthropiczaq
- lol who cares, all the devs using Claude :)))********
- utopian0
- ba0054a?fl=pl&fe=vl
- utopian0
- ba0054a?fl=pl&fe=sh
- WTF this is not the correct video..?87%$$utopian
- I tried the other day, Vimeo’s links are fucked https://www.qbn.com/…PhanLo
- ********-6
- AI wars started********
- Fuck yeahmonospaced
- Yes!Salarrue
- https://claude.com/i…********
- AI wars started
- ********-10
- Wars using AI started********
- All a scam from Scam Altman?
https://garymarcus.s…******** - So fucked.MrT
- It's all in movies....ApeRobot
- Silicon Valley new seasons about AI will be top!********
- Dumb fuck there is no AIYakuZoku
- There's only AI slop********
- Wars using AI started
- ********-5
