Transformers 3
- Started
- Last post
- 104 Responses
- _niko0
saw it, @ 2 1/2 hours they could habe cut 1 hour out of it, mostly bullshit action/3D sequences.
the first 20 minutes were cool, old fashioned sci fi movie ala twilight zone or something, then it becomes a michael bay cluster fuck.
- Boz0
^ so what's the conclusion? He took two clips from his previous movie. The whole action sequence on a freeway was waaay longer anyways in Transfomers 3. Not sure what the insinuation is here? He ripped himself? He borrowed two short clips of mayhem on a freeway from another movie and completely repurposed them with Robots in them? Don't see what's wrong with that.
Some people have waaaaaay too much time on their hands.
- not saying anything to you eficks.. just trying to understand the point of that clip that's been going around.Boz
- its not an insinuation its just an interesting detail of his movies. its a good thing i thinkDodecahedron
- hans_glib0
<img src="tehinterwebsomewhere/whofuckingcares.gif" />
- jadrian_uk0
"What's ironic is that we ALL know you will SEE the movie. At which point, if I saw you in real life, I'd beat the shit out of you for posting in this thread the way you did."
ok so you're going to beat the shit out of me for posting in this thread?
Your review sucks, deal with it.
- dopepope0
This weekend, Transformers: Dark of the Moon dominated the box office with an estimated $97.4 million on approximately 9,300 screens at 4,013 locations. In the process, the robo-threequel rocked the Independence Day weekend gross record, eclipsing Spider-Man 2's $88.2 million, and socked Pirates of the Caribbean: On Stranger Tides for the top-grossing weekend crown of 2011 so far. The Friday-to-Sunday opening salvos of Transformers and Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen were $70.5 million and $109 million, respectively.
- animatedgif0
The robot design and motion in this film is fucking garbage, no idea a giant robot film could be boring until I saw this turd.
- pr20
Boz,
it's very hard to argue with someone who right away uses descriptive words to oversimplify the opposing party's point but assuming you really want to have a conversation based on the merits of the film... Here we go.Yes, there are popcorn flicks that are not meant to be deep of eye opening but I have to ask you how many times you need to see exploding stuff before you say “Booooooring!” I mean I poped “Battle: Los Angeles” for 10 minutes (that I got from my step-father's bootleg collection) and at some point with whole of LA being bombed I was paying more attention to a bugger pulled out of my nose. Now, assuming that i'm not some deranged individual who doesn’t know the difference in value between a buggar and thousand of lives being lost in that bombing why would it be that the image of bombing were of so little interest to me? Do I have some serious attention deficit disorder that prevents me from paying attention to all those explosions? Well, the truth is that explosions on the screen simply do not turn me on anymore – maybe i'm getting old, or maybe I “have seen it all” thus just explosions, and just shit blowing up is simply not enough. What is so curious that there is a whole army of people who seem to go though a mass amnesia as each time they chose to go see the movies the say “wow” to the same explosions... now, why would that be? Is it that those popcorn flicks are for really young audience who simply haven't seen all those explosions just yet (thus my comment about the 13 year old and under age group)?
Now for you to say that we'll all see it anyway at some point... Well, you do have Netflix account, right? And thus access to pretty much any film ever made? If so then why would you subject yourself to such boring, predictable experience? This is not 1998 where this along with a few other films is all one can see! Especially even as far as popcorn flicks are concerned this one is tremendously uninspiring. Of course no one is expecting deep film making from Michael Bay but aren't we being a bit too lenient when it comes to our acceptance of his “thrill rides”? I mean, there are no thrills! Even he himself understands that by simply recycling shots from his previous films (made 7 years ago), if the maker himself is not having any fun how can he expect us to have any?
We are living in times where there is simply so much fantastic content available all over that for me to spend any amount of time on uninspiring productions is simply time wasted.
- but...but...Shia is GAY!monospaced
- therefore, it sucksmonospaced
- THIS FROM A GUY WHO DOESN'T KNOW HOW TO SPELL "BOOGER."nb
- +1, tiresome shit for kids and manchildrenanimatedgif
- dopepope0
As far as the robots go, I first felt they were way too convoluted to be Transformers, but I understood the visual effect reasoning to a point. I do respect their ability to pull off such complex visuals however. And I've come to accept that they aren't going to suddenly appear different, so I'm cool with the 'scrap metal' appearances. But I still HATE Optimus' face.
- but if they ever make a Gundam movie or a Robotech and pull this crap...dopepope
- dopepope0
LOL
- Douglas0
i could care less about him recycling his own clips, and i'm not sure what michael bay's contract says, but i would think it to be more of a rights issue with the studios he made those films for if it were for different studios.
- ernexbcn0
- loldopepope
- no sex = gaymonospaced
- haCALLES
- loljadrian_uk
- That looks like Sean Penn to you? Great movie by the way. An example of everything thats wrong with Transformers.CygnusZero4
- ahahaomg