logo critique...help please
- Started
- Last post
- 37 Responses
- Yolo0
more of a picture than a logo
- spendogg0
drop the mag glass and pie chart. keep the type
- i_monk0
The logo is very literal, it's clipart, and therefore very forgettable, but you may be on to something with the "Work" treatment.
- Dam - you're right...it does feel clip arty!!...movingpixel
- movingpixel0
sorry - yep you're right research is misspelled
....i guess this is where i get my ass kicked......hmmmmm- Ass kicked by strangers or embarrassed by the client. Pick. :)i_monk
- i'd prefer to take neither - but a lessoned has been learnt - so i'll take thatmovingpixel
- *put on soccer shoes*akrok
- holds ankles and clenches teeth....movingpixel
- dbloc0
- love it...can i use it as my own?movingpixel
- don't steal dbloc good work.akrok
- its strangely familiar - it gives me partial memories of flashing lights, loud music...and wanting to hug strangers...hmmmmmovingpixel
- akrok0
what's up with the pac-man "o".
- akrok0
REA SEARCH - we find you the BEST price, ever.
REA means SALE in swedish.
- < you know swedish too? dang you are a smart man.capn_ron
- ummmm...no in my haste i fucked up...just my stupid mistakemovingpixel
- hah, si, si. ron.akrok
- capn_ron0
the type is cool. i think the pac man o would possibly work better as a fill than a stroke. and the misspelling needs to be fixed. i don't think the magnifying glass and charts are even needed. I don't think the little pieces are needed near the type either.
- i_monk0
See if you can make part of PIECES or OF become the missing pie wedge of the O in WORK. Stacked, though.
- By 'part' I mean a letter. Parts of words are letters.i_monk
- i'll have a play - tamovingpixel
- k_temp0
If you like the pie chart so much work it around with the "o," I agree with both guys that looks a lot like PACMAN.
You have WAAY too many elements here to make it a solid logo, try keeping it simple: 1 font, 1 underline or none, no magnifier or no pie or none of both.
Also, you are magnifying a portion of the pie that shows shit; if you were trying to zoom on something, zoom it on something that makes sense... perhaps logotype!??!
- bulletfactory0
too many elements here trying to be clever. Simplify, minimize. Type alone works better (minus pac man)
- akrok0
just do P of W, done.
- doesnotexist0
^ do a monogram of P&W
already looks good in verdana
- ********0
Need to simplify that joint. Looks good, imo, but overly complex. I think you could reduce this a bunch and come away with something striking.
- OSFA0
- doesnotexist0
really, the P&W in verdana, small, would be really nice imo


