new urban outfitters logo
- Started
- Last post
- 27 Responses
- gramme0
This makes 032 look like something better than pure garbage.
- gramme0
In the other thread, francoisfido said:
"There seems to be an interesting kind of internal contradiction to these different interpretations to the term 'anti-design'; i've always thought of 'anti' as something which is truly negating the act of choosing and carefully applying an aesthetic. that is an approach to the 'design' process which favors economical 'default' rather than overtly crafted 'ugly'."
- maquito0
- sorry... wrong clipboardmaquito
- good curve ball howeverSrSamaurai
- SrSamaurai0
are they clowning the gap?
- 5timuli0
http://www.urbanoutfitters.com/
I'd like to think I'm missing the point somewhere here, but this site is awful. Every single typographic rule broken. It's like it's trying too hard to look intentionally poorly designed and just coming off as, well, poorly designed.
- SrSamaurai0
next stop... other thread
- jaylarson0
wabi sabi
- jmilligan0
looks like just america
http://www.urbanoutfitters.co.uk…
- rosem0
let's connect the dots...
— company is hurting for sales, and just about bankrupt.
— company sees attention that gap received for their "terrible" logo.
— company purposely makes the worst logo possible to grab some of that attention.- It don't think the logo thing was really all that great for GAP.ukit
- identity0
Mike Meiré design this?
- ukit0
Do we really need two threads to discuss this?
This breaks all the rules of traditional threads on QBN, and by that measure I regard it as a total and utter failure of threadsmanship.
- JSK0
Bump
- JSK0
- JSK0
are just scraping the surface here or something?
– 74LEOI think you are on to something.