Which iPad
- Started
- Last post
- 68 Responses
- FredMcWoozy0
Let me just ask.
Why?
You guys are seriously running to the store to buy one of these things? just so you can be cool? Have the new apple product?
Do you really need it or do you just want it?
- I can't even afford it, we were having a decent discussionernexbcn
- ukit0
- pavlov0
this is some nerdy shit
- pango0
get them all!
- ukit0
We're all making assumptions about ways that it's good/bad but it's kinda pointless to speculate isn't it? I'm guessing that, like me, none of you have ever used a large tablet device like this. Once you drop your $500-900 on the thing, is it going to end up being this amazing intuitive device that you use everyday like the iPhone, or will it end up being a novelty that we'll all get sick of it in a couple days? For me that's the main question, not whether it has Flash or a camera. I'm kind of tempted to buy one just to see, but I'd rather wait for the 3G enabled version at the end of the month.
- GeorgesII0
- Why not? You're assuming they can't put it back together again.detritus
- to manufacture something similar and sell it for $100clearThoughts
- it's gadget PORNernexbcn
- yeah, I forgot the good ol' Gporn,
now that I look at it, I can appreciate the forms and holes, BRBGeorgesII - brbGeorgesII
- *passes George a tissue*detritus
- no need, Detritus,
I always fap on my balcony....GeorgesII
- raf0
Lukus, your idea to let the corruptible bureaucrat muppets in governments decide how stuff should be sold is what scares me. It's not the corporations that brought the current crisis on us as you say, it was mostly government control (ie. political-correctness driven Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae). They keep telling it was the lack thereof because they want more – and this is what they're getting.
Don't worry about monopolies, they always fail, they're unsustainable in the long run. Worry if they get politicians to rig the system for them. Letting governments decide about markets is a perfect door for it.
What is important is to have diversity. There are closed systems and open systems, this is a healthy situation. If you force all systems to be open, you ironically get less options: no closed systems.Let the corporations fight each other competing. It is always good for the end customer who gets a cheap and developed product. American working class was the first in the world to be able to afford luxury products like cars. All thanks to hard competition.
The beauty of free market is also there is always a place for a David amongst Goliaths. This is more true now than ever. Facebook was founded in 2004 in a dorm room.
The Crunchpad story, failed for organisational reasons, showed how easy it was to produce a touchpad tablet. Almost anyone can make one and they will.- Yeah, but it's the fact politicians are corruptible that's the problem. We need to reduce the possibility of lobbying maybe?lukus_W
- maybe?lukus_W
- I think part of the reason we're in this mess, is because there was a lack of regulation. Maybe economists would agree.lukus_W
- But I understand your fears about gov. control. I do think that laws and legislation does have a place in society though.lukus_W
- *dolukus_W
- Power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely (Lord Acton, some 130 years ago).raf
- You want to give politicians more power, what a fantastic idea.raf
- No - I want to make corporations accountable to us.lukus_W
- The way things are heading .. this is becoming less likely - we rely on them _hopefully_ doing the right thing.lukus_W
- ... but yeah, politics needs to be cleaned up somehow first.lukus_W
- By giving them more power? Over what we smoke, eat, drink, what tablets use?raf
- "Socialism means slavery." - also Acton, in 19th century.raf
- Socialism doesn't mean slavely -> that's bullshit. The US media tells you that, but it's not true.lukus_W
- Socialism is just about putting people before profit -> it's a tonic to extreme commercialism / capitalism.lukus_W
- It coexists with capitalism and moderates it - keeps it focused and balanced.lukus_W
- Banks could fuck up 'cause they had govt. guarantees. This means they had zero responsibility, no risk at all.raf
- Every so often we need to ask - is this good for society. < when you ask that, it's socialism in action.lukus_W
- Parts of the gov. will need to be dismantled .. but that doesn't mean all gov. is bad.lukus_W
- Socialism is destructive, it takes away freedom for the price of comfort. You have no responsibility for your actions.raf
- You lose your job, the govt. pays you. You're a single mom - there is no better gig in terms of job security.raf
- Socialism != nazism, communism or fascism .. the US media is completely out of order for spreading this nonsense.lukus_W
- The idea that ALL people take advantage of benefits and milk the system is wrong ..lukus_W
- It's not a reason to stop caring as a society.lukus_W
- "people initiative" and philanthropy are natural parts of healthy free market capitalism, don't make it socialism :)raf
- The alternative is to let people starve, die and rot when they're faced with adversity.lukus_W
- SOCIALISM IS ABOUT PUTTING PEOPLE BEFORE PROFIT. Occasionally that's a good thing ;)lukus_W
- Socialism and capitalism are compatible.lukus_W
- "The problem with socialism is that eventually you run out of other people's money" –who said that? :)raf
- ... someone with a lot of money, no doubt ;)lukus_W
- btw, the bank system is rigged for them: you must use their services to run a business.raf
- We just need to find good ways to implement 'people initiatives' / 'philanthropy' -> sometimes it's logical for the gov. to implement the solutions.lukus_W
- monetary system is rigged: you cannot print your own currencyraf
- the solutions.lukus_W
- I do sympathise with the idea that big government is a bad thing.. but the answer is somewhere in the middle, imo.lukus_W
- We need regulatory frameworks which are intelligent and fair - in terms of digital stuff, some of these frameworks still need to be invented.lukus_W
- be invented.lukus_W
- It seems logical, how come it never works? Have you seen a good EU website? they all cost fortune each...raf
- Well, yeah the EU is another problem .. it's difficult. I have no idea what's best to be honest.lukus_W
- I just have a hunch that corporations aren't going to put us first, unless they have to.lukus_W
- I don't really know where the answer is, I just feel taking risk from people's lives is destructive, kills healthy instinctraf
- And I agree with that (Maggie Thatcher) quote: EU economy is in agony. Socialism's problem is it is not sustainable.raf
- \8=======D/ COCKBOAT! holy shit guys, 40+ comments!ernexbcn
- class dismissedmonospaced
- Hahaha... I just love socialist/capitalist banter with lukus_W, missed it :)raf
- whatthefunk0
I think the real issue is an additional service plan for internet for any mobile device. I'm considering purchasing this Verizon Wireless MiFi™2200 Intelligent Mobile Hotspot http://www.verizonwireless.com/b… so that I can power my ipod touch, ipad and laptop off the same hotspot compared to purchasing 3 different plans. I'll get an iphone if/when it comes out on verizon but until then I can't justify purchasing various plans for different devices. This issue bothers me.
- clearThoughts0
potentially distractive pair of tits on this one.
- I'll be in my bunkernexbcn
- what a dull reviewGeorgesII
- but she has great boobageGeorgesII
- Yeah - the boobs make up for her incompetence at doing a review. Would you rather have a fat, bold guy that actually knows what he's talking about?clearThoughts
- talking about?clearThoughts
- the "unboxing" videos are fucking dumb. so many people do them, as if 1 isn't enough.mg33
- GeorgesII0
@ emexbcn and lukus_w
just get the frackin thing ok, try it, if you don't like it return it,both of you just know that no matter what you chose, you'll always have friends on QBN,
*pats both of them on the back
- lukus_W0
@emexbcn;
Yeah, but the iPad is going to work. People are going to love it, and digital content creators will love it even more (because IP can be sold successfully).
I'd be willing to bet that they'll be more classes of device produced which use the same 'App Store' model / closed-system in the future.
Anyway, I've made my points as best as I can ;)
Hopefully I am just being totally reactionary and over-the-top. I guess time will tell.
- Trust me, publishers will provide their content to other devices.monospaced
- bingoinhaler97
- ernexbcn0
@lukus_W I read concerns about computing becoming what the iPad currently is, but I don't that will happen. Meaning you can't code an iPad/iPhone app on those devices, you still need a full desktop or laptop with Mac OS X. And content creation people will stil require modern computers with modern operating systems.
So I don't think that Windows or Mac OS X will got the App Store ever, that's working for the moment for these new devices that aren't really full fledged computers but are really capable of some of the more common computing tasks.
- and scientists, and architects, engineers, etc etc etc. both will coexisternexbcn
- ernexbcn0
@detritus PC gaming is a huge market but the publishers are making money now it's on the consoles (because it's harder to pirate them). Most PC gaming studios are making console only titles now.
Blizzard and Valve are the US studios making more money on the PC now, the rest I'd say are korean MMOs and other PC games like Farmville and Facebook games
- Totally, but competing distribution platforms are available for the PC.lukus_W
- That's a good thing for the consumer.lukus_W
- PCs are not "walled gardens" like the iPad/iPhone or PS3 or Xbox 360ernexbcn
- There are SDKs and ways of publishing. Walled isn't exactly the case if there are clearly doors.monospaced
- Anyways, when you purchase that PC in the first place, royalties are going to Intel and Microsoft at some point.monospaced
- lukus_W0
@emexbcn;
My point is simple: Corporations should be accountable.
This can either happen through legislation OR by forcing competition within their internally invented markets.
If I can choose where I buy my Apps or whatever - I can vote with my cash if Apple or Sony or whoever do something shit.
- I don't comprehend your logicmonospaced
- yeah but Apple hasn't taken away functionality from a device yet like in this case Sony didernexbcn
- Read about people who've had problems with the App approval process.lukus_W
- If you think Apple isn't accountable, you're on crack. Everyone has been watching their every move.monospaced
- not being approved it's not the same as what Sony did with their PS3ernexbcn
- not being approved is the same issue - a corporation calling the shots without _needing_ to be accountablelukus_W