Logo Critique!
- Started
- Last post
- 41 Responses
- graphiknature0
3 FTW
- such0
I think I'd like it more with a capital 'I' and a bit narrower since it's not "imageMark"
- Its just an M without the dotbaseline_shift
- So?such
- It would be an I & M.such
- Antonelli0
yeah, #3 looks good to me now. but i would decrease the depth a little bit, so that the "i" is slightly narrower and not as fat.
- jimzyk0
strong mark.
im thinking 1/2 is best also - yeah more space between the type and icon. keep working on it, could be very nice if you get it spot on.looking at it maybe 3 is good too but needs a little more work too.
- inkpink0
perspective is very confusing with slab serif.
#3 is almost there but i'd cut off the bottom of letters up to point of M (the "V" shape) so that its more compact and you don't have that little crumb shape in the shadow.
- attentionspan0
- I like this. I want to munch on em! Are there more numbers like this?coco_ono
- theredmasque0
3
- fyoucher10
3
- WeLoveNoise0
2
- Thanks. Youve been helpful today. :)baseline_shift
- thanks
i actually prefer what antonelli said for 1 now :)WeLoveNoise
- formula0
Arby's Roast Beef
- Antonelli0
1, but create a little more distance between the icon and the Type.
Nice work!
- designbot0
I vote for 3....I like the i/M, not sure about the text positioned below it though.
- 7point340
2 is interesting but why not extent the serifs on the right side of that M like on the left?
- *extend
7point34 - Its supposed to be an 'I' and an 'M'. The I is perpendicular to the M. I was afraid this wouldnt read like that...baseline_shift
- ah completely missed the I in the first mark7point34
- *extend
- twokids0
doesnt work for me. I like the b/w 3d letter, its a strong visual, but the combo I + M does not translate. I think both letters need to be ...like maybe the I AND the M separated some some both are actually 3D...
- disagree, The I+M combo works just fine...and even if its not recognized right away, it provides an "aha!" moment later which is always goodyeeblazer
- twokids0
i think the combo I + M is too clever....i mean i get it and all but visually it does not really work. for me.
- GetRefresh0
3 and 1 (in that order)
- tcmmct0
I like the mark in one and two, but the text along the side doesn't work. Possibly with the type under like 3. would work better. It is a strong mark and you should let it stand out.
- jlaw850
Lose the slab serif, looks like University of Michigan, which is a pretty recognizable M. I like 3, is it not effective if the "i" is capitalized? Type is a bit big, IMO. Great concept tho!
- doesnotexist0
still looks funky. colors are weird too, both are too strong.