Poster Crit.
- Started
- Last post
- 36 Responses
- monospaced0
What did you learn from this?
- tank020
You should read that book that i suggested.
you got al the right elements and this book will learn a bit how you have to organize them...
- typist0
- My E is better lolrybo
- you wishtypist
- OUCHdoesnotexist
- I've always hated this logo, despite the ambigram styleAmicus
- tank020
These book are manuals i still check when i'm designing.
These kind of rules work in combination with your own creativity.
- 3point141590
way to many fonts, other than that interesting...
- Llyod0
it looks like something I would've made 5 years ago. Do over
- gentleman0
designers republic back in 1999
also the leading is far too tight.
society 47 - is too prominent for something that has virtually no role
bit of a font orgy & as trendy as them lines are in the background. you havent made them work hard enough. they serve no purpose - they dont have anything to do with 'new' or even interact with text.
it looks like you panicked and used some 'filler' to add more cowbell to your poster.the text looks like its straight out of an 'engrish' dictionary and you could write it a bit better. + who the fuck doesnt know what NEW means..
if you want to 'own' that word - you need to give it a meaning that relates to you. - not just.. 'oh.. well it comes later - cause we do too'
ie. new = something you have not seen before. new = outward looking. etcit basically feels like you are taking a shit loada references from a shit loada places in a complete vacuum. totally devoid of context.
try to figure out why each of these elements belongs on your page and make them deserve a place there.
otherwise you might as well put a dick on the bottom right corner
- fresnobob0
Smoke Weed
- imnotadesigner0
kerning is horrible... looks like you tried to make it tight but its just not done properly
- rybo0
any more feedback?
- leewilson780
you need to read up on geometry and white space.
- mistermik0
ahh every time i go to say something constructive it sounds terrible.
I'll move on.
- neue75_bold0
is it supposed to be ironic? Like saying something is new, but making it look like it was made 10+ years ago? You might want to harken back to an era a bit more bygone methinks...