logo crit
- Started
- Last post
- 24 Responses
- Vwprincess22
just looking for some feedback on this logo, the symbol of the i's would be used when the logotype isn't needed they wouldn't be placed together. thanks.
- skii0
who, what, why...
- monospaced0
the letterspacing (kerning) for 'interactive' seems a bit looser than 'iamme' (which is nice). I really like the 'iii' mark; quite memorable.
- eh, the "e" in iamme is a bit "out there"duckofrubber
- fair enoughmonospaced
- Renegade0
Failure for not uploading to QBN the actual logo that you want a critique for, thanks to Jnr_Madison you would of failed the class.
- chill out (jerk)...he linked to it
monospaced - Thanks for the update TrollRenegade
- calm downdoesnotexist
- relax http://www.youtube.c…Renegade
- you're calling me a troll? assmonospaced
- < homo says what?Renegade
- chill out (jerk)...he linked to it
- Bluejam0
there's a band called 'chk chk chk' out there whose logo is !!!
- WeLoveNoise0
like the colour youv'e used and i like the mark as well but just not keen on the overall concept.
Maybe if you change the typeface is will look better cos at the moment it doesnt say interactive agency to me [assuming thats what they are]
- Vwprincess220
thanks Jnr_Madison, i am still getting used to posting to this forum
the logo is for my company that I just started that is just me freelancing I am a interactive designer and I was considering this a temp logo for now but I am starting to move forward with projects and clients so I am thinking about keeping this logo
- def memorable so i suppose thats is a good thingWeLoveNoise
- OSFA0
don't mind Jnr_Madison, he's just an intern here....
- pressplay0
I like it. Simple and remarkable. Though, for some reason, I always read it like 1amme or lamme, the mark looks like 111 to me. Well, maybe it‘s just me.
- hallelujah0
the upside-down-i-as-exclamation-poi... has been used by most of the world's designers, including me--for me, this would be the main drawback of this logo
- a shame, too--the first person to think of it must have been shitting themselves with excitementhallelujah
- perhaps it was just a shartgramme
- skii0
the font seems a little corporate to me, it works on the icon but not the name. i like the flipped 'iii' creating '111', but i'd try encasing it in a circle or at least giving it some surrounding. not keen on the colours, bit dated. 'interactive' says to me orange/grey/neon green etc
- gramme0
I agree with Rand/hallelujah.
If you're set on the idea: I don't mind the use of lowercase serif, but would recommend something more contemporary. Also, you've got some kerning issues.
- ********0
three ones underscored by an ellipsis. seems tentative.
- nick11320
dont really get it.. i wouldnt just create a logo based on the iii's being grouped together don't get it.. and doesn't really get an emotional response out of me not exciting really,, and why 3 i's i only see 2 i and interactive how bout doing something interesting with the 2 i's have them "interact" with each other..
- holy0
like other people have said...i would definitely go with a more contemporary font.
interactive media is definitely something that's very modern, very NOW.
your logo - the typeface choice, as well as the colors, bring to mind classic typography. bringhurst? arts and crafts movement? it's beautiful, but the feeling isn't right.i would go with a sans serif, myself.
orange / grey / neon green has been done to death but hey, if it ain't broke...try to find an innovate way of weaving the words 'iamme' and 'interactive' together, perhaps?
...
i'm rambling now.
if you take another stab at your logo i'd love to see it!
- Vwprincess220
finally i have some more logos that I have been working on to show, I am leaning towards the first one, but I would love to hear some comments and see what others think. Thanks.
- up is better as these 3********
- bottom one, simple and straight forwardd_rek
- up is better as these 3
- Blaytont0
It reads as "Lame Interactive"
- BattleAxe0
nice site btw
- Vwprincess220
back for some more feedback let me know what you think. Thanks.
- brandelec0
hmm, your concept seems to be evolving backwards
