Politics

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 33,773 Responses
  • ********
    0

  • ********
    0

    • terrific, too bad the rest of that interview she was spouting drivel about doomsday predictions and other equally silly things
      ********
    • Student bailout, 20 million jobs, climate meltdown, getting rid of wars for oil is silly things you say?
      ********
    • yes because they are either fiscally irresponsible or down right misrepresented
      ********
    • the government is not the answer to all our ailments, hucksters like jill would have you dismiss all personal responsibility and put your faith in politicians
      ********
    • like her. how many times are people like you going to dance around the fire every time some dipshit promises you 'hope' or 'change'. they are all the same, be t
      ********
    • he change you want to see in the world and when it comes to voting be a bit more practical. a vote for this clown ass bitch is a vote for trump
      ********
    • @terry_cloth I'm not sure why you choose to degrade women the way you do.
      ********
    • Jill and Hillary are practically on the same side of politics with slight differences in Ideologies compared to Trump
      ********
    • Major difference which I think makes Trump an interesting candidate in comparison is who pulls the strings in their decision making
      ********
    • Hillary is corporate paid and the last thing you want as a mass bulk of the big issues going on right now are corporate driven.
      ********
    • lol, i'm not degrading women, i'm degrading this particular woman, nice white knighting though. but yes, that is the main reason people are interested in trump
      ********
    • he is an outsider candidate and people are sick of business as usual after promises of revolution and change
      ********
    • banks were bailed out with help from the government, and students were left screwed because of these banks.
      ********
    • Yet the economy rises when people have money, and we just gave the banks more money and put the students in debt.
      ********
    • ok, let me stop you there pal, "we" didn't put the students in debt. they took out loans willingly. stop with the victim complex bullshit. nobody told them that
      ********
    • they had to go fuck about with some meaningless degree that wouldn't pay enough to make good on the debts that they WILLINGLY TOOK UPON THEMSELVES
      ********
    • nobody forced them to go to college in the first place, some of my best friends make way more money than i do and they worked there way up in the skilled trades
      ********
    • [*their] with no college diploma. when people stop rushing into college to get worthless degrees, the universities will have to alter their business model and t
      ********
    • -he price will drop. having subsidized the banks is not a valid analogy to make the argument that we should subsidize gender studies degrees for yuppies in trai
      ********
    • -ning. no thanks pal, not buying that line of bullshit
      ********
    • Unless you're a bank, which you must be because you're defending them like you were sleeping with them.
      ********
    • The banks were very responsible for creating the financial crisis.
      ********
    • You have college educated kids at an enormous rate after 2008 due to this.
      ********
    • they were given a very bad deal, and debt at no fault of their own.
      ********
    • they work, but can barely survive, and there is no way they can pay it back.
      ********
    • the elitist banks had lots of money, and we gave them more money.
      ********
    • so they in turn can give it to other people who have money.
      ********
    • yet you think we need to squeeze a dollar from a rock from kids who got robbed by the system.
      ********
    • we talking about basic needs like food, water, clothing and shelter that people are required to have in order to work these days. which is college.
      ********
    • P.S. - when you call a woman a bitch, yes that is degrading women. just like calling them"honey" will also get you fined or jailed in a court of law.
      ********
    • You're the type of person to blame the rape victim for being raped in the first place.
      ********
    • Wow, well this conversation is over, calling me a rapist sympathiser was a bit over the top there. You need to stop with the white knighting and the victim comp
      ********
    • -lex shenanigans, you don't seem to put very much stock in personal responsibility so there is no point in me talking to you about this further
      ********
  • brnmkg1
  • brnmkg2

    • A dick who couldn't swallow Hillary's bullshit.
      ********
    • he should be fed to Ramsey's HoundsRamanisky2
    • +1 Ramanisky2brnmkg
  • BonSeff4

    2nd Amendment people

    • yea, upvoted. the constitution rocks
      ********
  • ********
    -4

  • Ramanisky24

    look at the guy's (white beard in the red shirt ) reaction right when the Orange Taint implies that 2nd amendment people should, you know, "Take Care" of Hillary ....

    add another one to a LONG fucking list.

    • What a fucking asshat Trump is. So this is the new normal is it? Threats against your opponent.BusterBoy
    • Oh ffs, he never said "take care" of Hillary. Christ everything he says is completely taken out of context.IRNlun6
    • “If she gets to pick her judges, nothing you can do, folks,”
      ********
    • Oh ffs..."maybe the 2nd amendment people can do something". Seriously, what the fuck do you think he insinuated by that?BusterBoy
    • Yes, the 2nd amendment people will sing fucking Kumbaya & get her to change her mind.BusterBoy
    • Trump apologists...happens too often for it to be anything other than calculated.BusterBoy
    • What people always do during an election... VOTE.IRNlun6
    • I used the word "implied"Ramanisky2
    • He's fucking with your fear BusterBoy, or you're fucking with ours as there is not one instance of evidence that 2nd amendment people are murderers.
      ********
    • They've been nothing but activists in exercising rights at most.
      ********
    • An amendment that even Bernie Sanders supports
      ********
    • Dear me. He's using this violent implied rhetoric to whip his delusional supporters into a frenzy. Sad you don't see that.BusterBoy
    • What even sadder is the fear causing delusions people suffer from seeing others voicing an opinion other than their own.
      ********
    • Sad day for haters. :[yurimon
    • Fear? It's fucking anger mate. People like Trump should NEVER be anywhere near public office for anything.BusterBoy
    • Doesn't mean I love Clinton either. She's a pretty fucking terrible candidate as well.BusterBoy
    • But Trump...he's on an entirely new level of terrible.BusterBoy
    • Difference between north and south is northerners pretend to like you, while southerns will tell you they don't like you.
      ********
    • The people are left with trying to figure out the lesser of the two evils.
      ********
    • except for the bots because they just mind numbingly support whatever the fuck Hillary says
      ********
    • Says botboy AllenRamanisky2
    • Trump brings up an important danger of political figures undermining the constitution.
      ********
    • By assigning judges who are supposed to take neutral positions, who'll then in turn favor Hillary with her lawyer credentials.
      ********
    • This was the same big mishap in the DNC that many people took a blind eye as Democrats.
      ********
    • Fucking omgRamanisky2
    • And Trump saying he will appoint very conservative judges is different because? Oh that's right...it's fucking not!BusterBoy
    • The system is obviously broken, and you'll probably also want to be concerned with someone like Trump doing the exact same thing.
      ********
    • Instead of looking at the possibilities and improving government, the media instead twists this into a possible death threat. WTF!!!
      ********
    • He says "if Hillary picks her Judges .. which implies that she is "the President" that there's nothing you can do, although the 2nd Amd people, maybe there is"Ramanisky2
    • Wait what...Supreme Court is supposed to be neutral? lol.yuekit
    • I don't think you understand how this whole judging thing works omgyuekit
  • ********
    -1

  • ********
    -1

    • most fucked up thing is this really happened during the DNC.
      ********
  • utopian2
    • the best wordsBusterBoy
    • What would happen if Hillary words wasn't mixed with everyone else?
      ********
  • Ramanisky23

    • yupmoldero
    • too bad those were never Trump's words. [deprogramming engaged]
      ********
    • Fucking omgRamanisky2
    • :)
      ********
    • is that the only english phrase you know? why are you so lazy
      ********
    • Oh hi terryRamanisky2
    • hey whatsup really though, why can't you discuss things like a normal person, enough with the lazy bullshit. so, do you really think trump was inciting murder?
      ********
    • yesmoldero
    • and you really think he wasn't implying 2nd Ammendment remedies ??
      Ok your opinion.
      Ramanisky2
    • 2nd amendment remedies to me means the turn out of the enormous, politically active, nra supporters but hey, you have your own narrative of the nra that colors
      ********
    • your perception
      ********
    • OkRamanisky2
    • " the turn out of the enormous, politically active, nra supporters" then trump said, it would be tragicmoldero
    • it's clear what he meant terry, quit reciting FOX shitmoldero
    • i don't watch fox and i haven't listened to this trump speech, all i know is that calling for your political opponent would not be well received by the bulk o
      ********
    • -f trump's supporters, i am aware that you think the nra and the repub party are comprised of some sort of mr. burns and cletus simpsons cartoon characters but
      ********
    • try to grow up a bit and come to terms with the reality that people with political stances other than yours aren't all arch evil sociopaths that revel in the id
      ********
    • -ea of taking someones life
      ********
    • *calling for your political opponent ^ to be murdered
      ********
    • if you saw the trump speech then I could say we're on the same page on this issue
      ********
    • it's kinda hard to discuss the layers of fox programming that you watch or the lack of it.
      ********
    • why is terry commenting on a speech he hasn't even heard?moldero
    • He said "if Hillary picks her Judges" .. which implies that she is "the President" that there's nothing you can do, although the 2nd Amd people, maybe there is"Ramanisky2
    • on top of a tweet.
      ********
    • in which he has a misquoted conversation with himself
      ********
    • playing the role of Trump in between
      ********
    • i am commenting on a particular sentence in the speech that you guys have quoted not the speech itself. any ways, yea, that last bit ram, that could easily be i
      ********
    • -nterpreted to mean that the nra supporters are what's standing between hillary and the presidency. he worded it somewhat ambiguously, maybe on purpose, probabl
      ********
    • -y not though, it's a big stretch to try to characterize that statement as an incitement to murder
      ********
    • Hmm so why exactly did the secret service look into the matter???Ramanisky2
    • just watch the original speech yourself doofus, no wonder your so misinformedmoldero
    • i read the quote and that's the information in question so how could i be misinformed, you aren't making a whole lot of sense
      ********
    • anyways, i don't intend on watching any of that man's speeches
      ********
    • How would NRA supporters non-violently stop Hillary for nominating a judge once she's president?yuekit
    • He was obviously making a reference to violence, maybe not seriously, but still disturbing.yuekit
    • Does anyone really think NRA supporters are going to go in "guns blazing" to the steps of the Supreme Court?
      ********
  • BusterBoy5

    This absolute halfwit and Trump spokesperson for Vets, Al Baldasaro, a member of the New Hampshire House of Representatives, is suggesting Clinton has Parkinsons or Alzheimers...and quoting Infowars and that turd Alex Jones as proof.

    Prime example of the complete lack of intellect by most in the Trump camp.

    • his news sources are the same as yurimorons, infowars and tabloidsmoldero
    • Get a job yUrineRamanisky2
    • you guys are like little wind up toys, yuri triggers you and you march around bleating the same tired bullshit about him all over the god damned site, you fucki
      ********
    • -ng idiots are the problem not him
      ********
    • Oh terry just having fun ...
      Jesus relax
      Ramanisky2
    • you relax, enough is enough. if shitting all over this site trying to hate on somebody you don't even know is fun to you then you need to do some soul searching
      ********
    • I shit all over this site ?!? ...
      Yeah ok terr
      Ramanisky2
    • tell em' cum_cloth!utopian
    • Jeez... He's quoting a theory by Martin Schkreli, that Clinton has Parkinsons.mg33
    • yea here we go, it's my semen obsessed #1 fan. somebodies still missing though, where's fadein
      ********
    • Settle down jizz_clothBusterBoy
    • lol @ terry missing the months/years of trolling from Yurimon haha... classic nappy behaviour.fadein11
    • Ah terrific, everybody's here now. The fan club has assembled. You guys should merge into a overweight nerd megazord and shout down all dissenting oppinion with
      ********
    • Chronic masturbator fury
      ********
    • haha - no offense but if you missed yuri's relentless trolling and condescention - where you been?fadein11
    • terry you somehow missed how yuri goes around calling everyone idiots for yearsmonospaced
    • thanks for proving it all correct!yurimon
  • ********
    5

    FUCKING LOL at you Trump-defenders who say his words are "taken out of context" or that he's constantly misrepresented. You all know what he was implying, and we all know that he meant it as a joke. We don't all need to argue like children about it.

    But while we're on the subject of people being misrepresented.... Can someone please link the video or article where Hillary says she essentially wants to abolish the Second Amendment?

    I can't seem to find it anywhere.

    • btw, I'm not excusing him for making a joke about murdering a future president. It's despicable and all Republicans should be ashamed of what they've nominated.
      ********
    • Exactly 1,000%Ramanisky2
    • Plenty of info out their on how she would gut the 2nd amendment but they're likely not sources you'd believe. A simple example, litigation of gun manufacturers.IRNlun6
    • what are you going to do when you learn the scary truth? I'm not sure you're ready for it.
      ********
    • IRN is right on this one, even Bernie said that was too farmoldero
    • I don't understand paranoia of gun owners that someone is going to take their guns. There are more guns than people in the U.S., even if government had theyuekit
    • power to do so it would be logistically impossible.yuekit
    • In order to take the guns away from people, there will have to be a staged attack on the people first.
      ********
    • its not the kind of stuff you wanna be talking about on the internet
      ********
    • OMG omgRamanisky2
    • :(
      ********
    • the speculation alone is enough to get you listed.
      ********
    • I agree with you yuekit. The logistics and the resistance to it are unmanageable.IRNlun6
    • when they are poor and hungry, they can either choose to keep their families safe or feed their family.
      ********
    • how would you do that you ask? take away their jobs for starters
      ********
    • IRNIun6 = calm, calculated, rational.

      nb = emotionally volatile, defensive, accusationial, shouty.
      ********
    • @IRNIun6: Can you see the contradiction? You complain that Trump's words are taken out of context, while you yourself "translate" on behalf of Hillary.
      ********
    • My point is the contradiction in Trump saying "that's not (exactly) what I said" while he accuses Hillary of something that she clearly has not said.
      ********
    • You can't have it both ways. Either we are allowed to interpret the words of these people or we're not.
      ********
    • She has said she wants to repeal 2005 law that grants firearms manufacturers and dealers “immunity” from lawsuits by victims of gun violence.IRNlun6
    • I'm not interpreting anything. Those are her words and that action would destroy the firearms market.IRNlun6
    • She has come out against the 2nd amendment many times is her career so we can infer from Trumps comment to "abolish" is more in line with her position..IRNlun6
    • Trump has no history of violence or ordering hits on any political opponents. So to infer from his comment that he did is so is pure speculation.IRNlun6
    • You can look at his comment as just another extreme way to get attention, but can easily interpreted it in a dozen other ways.IRNlun6
    • If you haven't seen by now, the entire media establishment is picking apart small comments like this to assassinate his character. It's effective, expect more.IRNlun6
    • Because the entire media establishment believes Trump is unfit for the position, just like most of the world's intelligent, educated and influential people.monospaced
    • Even high ranking people in the Republican party feel this way. Not everything is a conspiracy.monospaced
    • Dumb peoples opinions don't deserve equal consideration and only the candidate smart people deem to be worthy gets a pass from criticism.IRNlun6
    • That still implies conspiring for the selected candidate.IRNlun6
    • Yes, except for the fact that the media has been picking apart stupid shit Trump has said and done for 30+ years. It wasn't a conspiracy then.monospaced
    • What you call conspiring most would call plain support. It's not like all those talking heads don't passionately believe Trump is unworthy when they say itmonospaced
    • They can bash away, it's the free pass they give Hillary that's the problem. Let the public decide who's more fit for office. Not some media shills.IRNlun6
    • No one forced Trump to act like a lunatic though. If the GOP hadn't nominated such a controversial candidate, Hillary wouldn't be escaping scrutiny so easily.yuekit
    • This is a recurring pattern in U.S. politics. The fact that the GOP is so far right prevents a real debate from happening on many issues because you areyuekit
    • faced with a choice between status quo and insane right-wing lunatic.yuekit
    • In my opinion trump has either been allowed to get where he is, or put where he is, in order to give hillary the free pass you mentioned.
      ********
  • IRNlun6-5

    Mike Morell, the former CIA director raving about Hillary earlier this week.

    • Charlie Rose even laughs at how nuts this guy is. Regardless, at no point does anyone mention Hillary in this video. ??
      ********
    • He wrote the NYTimes piece earlier this week supporting Clinton. He's a Senior Advisor for Beacon Global Strategies, foreign policy consultants to Mrs. ClintonIRNlun6
  • utopian6

    Why Donald Trump might not debate Hillary Clinton

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/n…

    • Maybe because he's a dumb thin skinned pussyRamanisky2
    • Face-to-face Trump connects. Hillary received way too many vulnerabilities within the past 2-months alone.
      ********
    • Then again it's probably up to the media, and they're not friendly with him right now.
      ********
    • You're talking about a crook who deceived America causing war and death vs a loudmouth dick who has not had the chance to do anything of the above mentioned.
      ********
    • That is essentially the overall perspective that people hold between the two candidates.
      ********
    • you might as well watch Hillary get on stage for 3 hours having him call her crook and a liar the entire time. It's not going to be pretty.
      ********
    • It's not up to the media if he debates. If he refuses it's because he's a chicken and is scared that Hillary would make him look like a moron.monospaced
    • Hows it different than what you appear as now mono?yurimon
    • lolmonospaced
    • omg implied the media wouldn't put Trump in a debate because "they're not friendly with him right now." I disagree, because the media would love that shitmonospaced
    • it's not moronic for me to think that Trump would back out of a debate where he has to speak on the issues without a script and telepromptermonospaced
    • I guess we'll see.
      ********
    • I'll personally quit visiting qbn forever if the media bans Trump from debating.monospaced
    • i wasn't saying the media would ban Trump.
      ********
    • of course they'll love that shit. that's what they live for.
      ********
    • i'm saying by knowing this, I would second guess doing a debate if I were Trump
      ********
    • because the media will just make him out to be a bad guy
      ********
    • ok, for a second there it sounded like you were saying that the media would not allow him to debate, or would somehow skew it against himmonospaced
    • the idea of trump refusing to debate because the MEDIA would make him look bad is a laughable excuse... the only thing that would do that is him.monospaced
    • I honestly wish that I could say that the ones who control our vote is corporate media. They are essentially the middle men between voters and the booth.
      ********
    • The question may be whether they fan the flames for more views, or fan them towards a political agenda.
      ********
    • *(correction) I honestly wish that I could say that the ones who control our vote is NOT corporate media.
      ********
    • thing is, to most intelligent, educated people, the media isn't required to convince them that trump is never getting their votemonospaced
    • just consider that there was a healthy donald trump hate thread for YEARS before he became a candidate, and so has the history of hating on him, it goes way bakmonospaced
    • have you forgotten that most of the world thought it was a joke at first? that most people thought the first debate was the end for the charade?monospaced
    • this was before the media turned it into the shit it is today, a full year latermonospaced
  • moldero4

  • reanimate1

    • I don't mean to sidestep the issue, but LOOK AT THAT TIE!
      ********
  • BuddhaHat7

    TIL.... Donald Trump quotes make a lot more sense when you imagine Zapp Brannigan saying them.....

    http://imgur.com/gallery/WCJxR


  • ernexbcn3

    The crazy levels keep rising, what a campaign...

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/l…

    • I dunno how I can even trust the Dems on the next election. Might as well just hand over the election to them. Just gonna dig it every election year.
      ********
    • Rig it every year*
      ********
    • Total lost of trust in the system.
      ********
    • Wikileaks using this to gloss over the evidence that the DNC mails were hacked/handled by Russians. How surprising.face_melter
  • ********
    3

    I just took these moments ago. Biaslol

    • try it with trump, it's not that differentmonospaced
    • True. Google gave me 'Trump is love, Trump is life' haha
      ********
    • and Yahoo suggests awful things about him too ... try Bing if you want some laughsmonospaced