Fact:
- Started
- Last post
- 123 Responses
- mrdobolina0
Guilty of what? I took part in the spitzer thread that you were fucking wrong about and unaware of. What are some of your old aliases? I can't see you having this much of a hard on over me if you were truly a noob.
- TheBlueOne0
Hmm..when a Republican (SEE: Wide Stance Larry Craig) gets arrested for soliciting (soliciting gay sex, nonetheless) he amazingly can still hold his job!!! The media investigates that it was a possible set up and shit even. Happens to it immediately and the media responds "Spitzer must step down!"
Funny how that works. That in no way excuses SPitzer's behavior and he should step down. But this whole thing is fishy to me..as soon as the NY State Attorney General launches a big probe into Wall Street, the Governor, long known to go after Wall Street Fat Cats, gets taken down from an investigation that smells of political motivations...Spitzer was stupid for putting himself in jeopardy for this and needs to step down, but this stinks of political motivations of the highest level.
- you're not being fair, blueone...mrdobolina
- i was thinking the same thing tbo. it just stinks.jaylarson
- somatica0
If by taking part you mean you tried being funny to diffuse the topic then yes, you in fact did take part.
I don't have any other aliases nor do I have a hard on over you. I posted the thread because it was an observation I've had over the past few months 'lurking' around. I was forced to log in when I had a question that needed and answer, and it wasn't really the type of question I could have easily asked my peers here at work. "Hard on"... and you accuse other users of their homosexual tendencies.
I'm not going to argue with you, if you can't handle the truth behind my observation then that's your problem, not mine mrdobolina.
- mrdobolina0
hahah, seriously get over it. What power do I hold here? I was "diffusing"? Seriously I am just a regular guy around here. Homosexual tendencies? Really you have like 50 problems with me, choose one and run with it or leave me the fuck alone.
- TheBlueOne0
With Tin Foil Hat firmly affixed I suspect that THIS is exactly what the whole FISA fight in DC is about and why Bush/Republicans are pushing it so hard. They're getting so much dirty laundry on Democrats at all levels in this vast "anti-terror wiretapping" thing that they'll be using this shit for the forseeable future. I'd like to get some more information about how this information was obtained fo this investigation, cause according to what I've read:
http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/st…
"The suspicious financial activity was initially reported by a bank to the IRS which, under direction from the Justice Department, brought in the FBI's Public Corruption Squad."
Weird, why would the transfer of monies under $10,000 dollars by a guy who is a millionaire (Spitzer is quite well off) be "suspicious" to a bank and the IRS? And when your bank is suspicious of fund transfers, don't they usually contact YOU first and not the IRS?
- marks for trying to keep this thread on its intended course734
- Futile, eh?TheBlueOne
- CALLES0
fact:
designers should never have a political career
feds: he spends all day in this place called "qbn" i think its a terrorist organization... lets get him!
- TheBlueOne0
"designers should never have a political career"
Fact: Hitler was a failed painter/commercial artist. If only one person gave him some nice reviews of his portfolio, well then, maybe, no Blitzkrieg. Think about it.
*looks around at other QBN members warily
- LOL & True
in fact that is a factCALLES - THAT'S A FACT, JACK!TheBlueOne
- LOL & True
- mrdobolina0
I love how these trolls come around and act like I am the only liberal around these parts. Read the rest of the threads somatica.
- TheBlueOne0
Wait? You're a liberal?!! I'm an anarcho-neo-communist with libertarian leadings on civil rights issues.
Hah! "Liberal"...so very twen-cen...
- HITLER!734
- I put it in terms that simple disphits can comprehend.mrdobolina
- Hitler would never be a neo-communist.TheBlueOne
- oh so you know so much about hitler do you, brian... or should i call you adolf!?734
- DUKIE08220
Weird, why would the transfer of monies under $10,000 dollars by a guy who is a millionaire (Spitzer is quite well off) be "suspicious" to a bank and the IRS? And when your bank is suspicious of fund transfers, don't they usually contact YOU first and not the IRS?
I worked at banks through hs and partly through college...and yes any time you are making frequent transfers under the 10000 dollar mark banks are required to report it to the feds...
The 10000 dollar mark is the trigger point for a bank employee to file a bsa report...However if a customer is making frequent transactions under the 10000 dollar mark the bank is required to report it, failure to do so results in penalties applied to the bank and even to the person conducting the transactionAlso the bank is under no obligation to inform the customer that their transactions are being reported...in fact you are trained not to mention it to the customer at all
- Actually with the Patriot Act I think it's at $5000 these days...TheBlueOne
- I don't believe the ammount changed due to the patriot act...I believe it just added add'l transactions that need to be reportedDUKIE0822
- to be reportedDUKIE0822
- czawada0
"Filter: That was not my point."
Yes it was, you stated how he hadn't made a thread. He didn't have to, there were already 2 or 3 started by others.
- CALLES0
Fact:
Today is tuesday
- Yet, if you read this tomorrow, it won't be.TheBlueOne
- except in some parts of the world where its actually wednesday734
- crap
failedCALLES - Run and hidecreative-
- czawada0
Fact:
Farts stink.
- TheBlueOne0
FACT: Someone in this building went to Cinnabon and is polluting the air with their baked glazed cinnamon-y smell of goodness and making me very fucking hungry.
- creative-0
Fact:
Spooky has Vaginal Meningitis
- detritus0
Fact:
MrDobolina is dressed up as a woman right now.
- TheBlueOne0
@DUKIE0822 - It's now $5000:
Patriot Act Section 314(b)
d. Transactions aggregating $5,000 or more that involve potential money laundering or violations of the Bank Secrecy Act. Any transaction (which for purposes of this subsection means a deposit, withdrawal, transfer between accounts, exchange of currency, loan, extension of credit, purchase or sale of any stock, bond, certificate of deposit, or other monetary instrument or investment security, or any other payment, transfer, or delivery by, through, or to a financial institution, by whatever means effected) conducted or attempted by, at or through the financial institution and involving or aggregating $5,000 or more in funds or other assets, if the financial institution knows, suspects, or has reason to suspect that:
i. The transaction involves funds derived from illegal activities or is intended or conducted in order to hide or disguise funds or assets derived from illegal activities (including, without limitation, the ownership, nature, source, location, or control of such funds or assets) as part of a plan to violate or evade any law or regulation or
to avoid any transaction reporting requirement under Federal law;ii. The transaction is designed to evade any regulations promulgated under the Bank Secrecy Act; or
iii. The transaction has no business or apparent lawful purpose or is not the sort in which the particular customer would normally be expected to engage, and the financial institution knows of no reasonable explanation for the transaction after examining the available facts, including the background and possible purpose of the ransaction.
- Sorry, you guys can return to other facts now...TheBlueOne
- CALLES0
FACT:
Moses Was High On a Concoction of Hallucigenics