critics needed
- Started
- Last post
- 13 Responses
- pascii
which one you like/not and why?
- bolus0
i think i like number one best, not sure why though
- jox0
Yes
No
NoSecond one is a little too messy, 3rd is like "Whoa, colors everywhere!"
First is actually really really pretty.
- Nairn0
I'm torn between bilds 1& 2.
bild2's subtle colouring makes it easier for my eyes to track sections and seems more pharma, whereas bild1 is more impactful and seems better organised (ie. less reliant on colouring). I get the feeling bild1 would be easier to content manage in the long run.
I'd be interested to see what bild3 looked like with a subtler colour scheme. I suspect that your client would prefer the last one too, perversely (they're getting 'more colour for their money' :)
- pascii0
cheers guys! i am waiting for clientfeedback since lunch. there goes my weekend :I
- bulletfactory0
you may try mixing elements of 1 and two - 1 has an airy feel, that may benefit from an element/secondary color used in two
adding a bgcolor on a few of the boxes may emphasize importance, while adding som organization and sofistication - i made a quick example of what I mean.....
- robotron3k0
No
Yes
No1 & 3 too busy, 2 is still busy but much easier on the eyes
- basebase0
definitely 1
- jaylarson0
1. it seems to have the best adhearance to simplicity and a grid structure. i thought 3 was pretty decent as it too was more grid like, but the color scheme was too garish.
good luck.
- stewart0
...and you're going to sifr the Caecilia into that website?
- pascii0
oh well... usability wasen't a salepoint here :I it'll be used as pictures
- chossy0
I like 3 sort the colors out, do it. :D
- onewhoslaps0
i'll have a #1 supersized with the color scheme of #2
- k0na_an0k0
I'm torn between bilds 1& 2.
bild2's subtle colouring makes it easier for my eyes to track sections and seems more pharma, whereas bild1 is more impactful and seems better organised (ie. less reliant on colouring). I get the feeling bild1 would be easier to content manage in the long run.
Nairn
(Feb 16 07, 04:17)Exactly what I was thinking. 2 is much more organized and info chunked together, but the text placement and usage is a bit off. 1 is nice and clean but there is nothing holding the page and sections together, looks disjointed.
Maybe a hybrid of the two using the best of whats working from each?