N. Korea's gotta nuke
- Started
- Last post
- 180 Responses
- TheBlueOne0
I think 'prophesied' is the word you're looking for, not 'prophesized'.
gramme
(Oct 9 06, 12:22)
----------------------
One could think that, but I did mean "prophesized"...
- k0na_an0k0
hahaha.... why do the past 5 or 10 posts or so give me the impression that each side is just waiting to drop the hammer on the other in this thread?
haha. like the jets vs. the sharks... someone is going ot start the dance first.
- mrdobolina0
what are the 2 sides?
- joyride0
Just to clear up what i meant for my first post. The world knows this is a bad thing. The US doesn't always need to be the 1st to step up and say how to handle this situation. We've got our hands full with our own mess(good or bad doesn't matter, we need to somehow clean it up), lets just support other UN nations taking a lead role in dealing with the situation.
Of course our gov won't do that, but I think they should try playing the supporting role for a change.
Now carry on
- mrdobolina0
wonder how long it will take the wingnuts to begin hating the new south korean sec. gen of the un.
- k0na_an0k0
wonder how long it will take the wingnuts to begin hating the new south korean sec. gen of the un.
mrdobolina
(Oct 9 06, 12:42)my guess. 34 days, 14 hours, 52 seconds. which will be a full 30 days later than when we started hating the new president in 08.
this time though i'm going to be smart about it. i'm already registering domain names off all the potential candidates so i can sell them at a later time to the parties interested who want to bash the person who finally got in.
big buck big bucks no whammies.
- Witt0
around this matters there's this argument that I (a socialist - which in Portugal is the equivalent to US democrats) find hard to fight, except with bluntness, and a dubious moral stand:
they say: "if you have nukes, why can't we have them"?
i say: "because you're not reliable."
they say: "Well, you westerners are not reliable either. Look at History. You in the West used Nukes before."
i say: "You're right. We have no excuse for that. That's why we're so politically correct. But you still can't have those. You're just doing nukes to prove your technological worth."
they say: "Of course. We have the same technological worth."
that's when everybody SHOULD say: "Ok. so let's all put nukes aside, without fearing each other."
my point is: Progress is based on energy control. We should look for alternative sources of energy that are not potentially lethal, and refrain from certain knowledge. If we really want world peace. If we don't, well then we are on the right track.
- Mimio0
evolve or die.
- PonyBoy0
do you think anyone gets naked w/Kim Dong Pill on purpose?
- Witt0
you're wrong, Mimio. We haven't evolved shit except outwardly. A real progress would be the supressment of death. I don't think nuclear power is getting us closer to it.
- Cactus0
Got any criticism for North Korea. You know, the one's who actually merit some...?
I thought not. Too busy chasing your own tails in a circle.
This thread is Geopolitics for Dummies.
- mrdobolina0
kona, I'm talking about the new UN guy
- k0na_an0k0
do you think anyone gets naked w/Kim Dong Pill on purpose?
PonyBoy
(Oct 9 06, 12:57)you mean without an ak-47 to their head? no.
- mrdobolina0
what good would blaming NK do? Wouldn't solve any problems.
OK OK OK
He's a dick, happy now? Now let's get past that.
- mrdobolina0
dude, because of manipulated media, they say the people of NK love that guy. So I'm sure he is pounding the skins regularly with women who think he is a god.
- PonyBoy0
dude, because of manipulated media, they say the people of NK love that guy. So I'm sure he is pounding the skins regularly with women who think he is a god.
mrdobolina
(Oct 9 06, 13:04)
---EWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW!
- mrdobolina0
hahaha, it is true. they say due to propaganda people think he is the shit.
- Mimio0
I'm not wrong Witt. I'm making an observation about perceptions on both sides of this thing.
- joyride0
Watch out for his son too. He's an even bigger nut.
I've read some articles on the ills. crazy sex parties, playboy style throwdowns. But loony as hell, I'll see if I can find them when i head home.
- Cactus0
The world is becoming a more dangerous place. Bush is not the source of that phenomenon (It happens from time to time, and, in this case, predates his presidency).
Bush has chosen to confront it head on. Such an approach clearly will exacerbate circumstances in the short term. I'm not convinced that a non-confrontational or denial of what's going on is any better solution.