logo crit
- Started
- Last post
- 36 Responses
- MrShadow0
cmon... this is not a good logo... the buildings look cartoonish and the mountains look hand-drawn and somewhat accidental... dont pursue this direction..
the only one with potential is in 6 - as it is somewhat abstract / geometric... maybe make the graphic a bit taller.. try combination with simple classic serifs / sans serifs - keep it simple and keep the relationship between the type and the graphic balanced...
drop inc - or make the same font - dont use too many font variants...
7 / 9 --big NO!
good luck
- Gucci0
maybe get an aerial land map of that hawaiian landmark and bust it up with a couple of planes of colour/shape but the buildings and the mountain aren't working together at all as they are. the perspective/style on the buildings is really throwing the whole thing off imo.
the elements aren't unifying the mark.
no.6 is a far more professional and interesting take.
- ludawg0
anyone in hawaii would instantly recognize it as diamond head. i just think the crater silhouhette should be smoothed out a little. too much detail for a logo.
- Baskerville0
I'd say number 2, but maybe the buildings should use a 'true' perspective rather than the growing look rising up from next to the mountain.
- Chimp0
Hmmm, I think there is too much detail in 1-6, the thin lines will get lost when the logo is reproduced smaller. Also the different sizes of type sit uncomfortable. Perhaps look at a different direction.
- phatlee0
The colours look a bit wishy washy, and I don't think the distorted perspective on the buildings is working. Have you tried everything in one colour as if it were a silhouette?
Dunno...
- agentfour0
i agree with mrshadow im afraid.
the exaggerated perspctive looks cartoonish and would make my impression of the company to be 'not serious' or amateur. I think you should try a less literal direction.
- lofielectronic0
6 or 7, probably 7
- MrShadow0
hey - nice work agent four...
- Nairn0
it's probably a little cheesy, but you could try and represent diamond head mountain using a series of similar Building-forms as in #s 6 & 8.
I agree with the other comments here - the perspectified buildings are Looney-tune, the mountain-form too literal and the colours too washed out (how will they stand out on signage out in the bright Hawaiian sun?)
Good luck!
x
- nooner0
SIX
- paraselene0
i agree with what nairn says, although i'm not sure why he's suddenly kissing everyone...
;)
- Nairn0
I'm just a modern day Mahir
'I KISS YOU !!!!!'
- mr_snuggles0
they all look _ . keep up the _ work...
- kyl30
anyway to soften the rt side of the mark that rt angle is throwing me off.
or maybe the type should be larger
looking good though